Paper vs leaf: Carbon footprint of single-use plates made from renewable materials

被引:8
作者
Korbelyiova, Lucia [1 ]
Malefors, Christopher [1 ]
Lalander, Cecilia [1 ]
Wikstrom, Fredrik [2 ]
Eriksson, Mattias [1 ]
机构
[1] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Energy & Technol, Box 7070, S-75007 Uppsala, Sweden
[2] Karlstad Univ, Dept Engn & Chem Sci, Univ Gatan 2, S-65188 Karlstad, Sweden
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Sustainable Development; Life cycle assessment; Disposable plates; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; DISPOSABLE CUPS; CHOICES; FOOD;
D O I
10.1016/j.spc.2020.08.004
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Plastic pollution of the natural environment world-wide is ubiquitous. More than 80% of marine litter is made of plastics, 70% of which originates from disposable items, so plastic disposables need to be replaced with disposables made from renewable materials. However, it is important to investigate the environmental impact of renewable alternatives through their life cycle, in order to support sustainable consumption and production. In this study, the carbon footprint of disposable plates made from two different renewable materials (paper, tree leaves) were analysed using life cycle assessment. The leaf plate was produced in India and the paper plate in Finland, but both were used and disposed of in Sweden. The results showed that the leaf plate had higher carbon footprint, due to long-distance transport and use of fossil fuel-based electricity for production. Scenario analysis indicated that the emissions associated with the leaf plate were lower when replacing air freight with sea transport and with economies of scale in expanded production. For the paper plate, the processing stage was shown to contribute most life cycle emissions. These could be lowered by applying a biodegradable coating. In comparison the leaf plate had the benefit of being biodegradable, but this benefit was not enough to compete with the paper plate which was consider the less environmentally damaging alternative. However, in order to increase sustainability in the food supply chain, it will not be enough to just improve the material use for single use plates, especially since the idea of single use materials could be seen as less sustainable, but improved materials have the potential to offset the anticipated growth of the food service sector where single use items are widely used. (C) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Institution of Chemical Engineers.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 90
页数:14
相关论文
共 63 条
[21]   Carbon footprint of food waste management options in the waste hierarchy - a Swedish Case study [J].
Eriksson, Mattias ;
Strid, Ingrid ;
Hansson, Per-Anders .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 93 :115-125
[22]   Plastic waste as a fuel - CO2-neutral or not? [J].
Eriksson, Ola ;
Finnveden, Goran .
ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2009, 2 (09) :907-914
[23]  
European Bioplastics, 2019, BIOPL MARK DAT
[24]  
European Commission, 2014, STAND VAL EM FACT VO
[25]  
FEFCO and CEPI Containerboard, 2015, EUR DAT CORR BOARD L, P40
[26]   Role of compostable tableware in food service and waste management. A life cycle assessment study [J].
Fieschi, Maurizio ;
Pretato, Ugo .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2018, 73 :14-25
[27]  
Finnish Energy, 2019, ELECT GENERATION
[28]   Environmental evaluation of single-use and reusable cups [J].
Garrido, Nuria ;
Alvarez del Castillo, M. Dolors .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2007, 12 (04) :252-256
[29]   Evaluation of Areca palm renewable options to replace disposable plastic containers using life cycle assessment methodology [J].
Gautam, Anirudh ;
Mata, Teresa M. ;
Martins, Antonio A. ;
Caetano, Nidia S. .
ENERGY REPORTS, 2020, 6 :80-86
[30]   Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made [J].
Geyer, Roland ;
Jambeck, Jenna R. ;
Law, Kara Lavender .
SCIENCE ADVANCES, 2017, 3 (07)