Measurements of wrist and finger postures: A comparison of goniometric and motion capture techniques

被引:45
作者
Cook, James R. [1 ]
Baker, Nancy A.
Cham, Rakie
Hale, Erin
Redfern, Mark S.
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Dept Otolaryngol, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Engn, Dept Bioengn, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Hlth & Rehabil Sci, Dept Occupat Therapy, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
关键词
model; ROM; hand biomechanics; kinematics;
D O I
10.1123/jab.23.1.70
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
A marker-based kinematic hand model to quantify finger postures was developed and compared to manual goniometric measurements. The model was implemented with data collected from static postures of five subjects. The metacarpal phalangeal (MCP) and proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints were positioned in flexion of approximately 30, 60, and 90 degrees for 5 subjects. Wrist flexion/extension and ulnar/radial deviations were also examined. The model-based angles for the MCP and PIP joints were not statistically equivalent to the goniometric measurements, with differences of -1.8 degrees and +3.5 degrees, respectively. Differences between the two measurement methods for the MCP and PIP were found to be a function of the posture (i.e., 150, 120, or 90 degree blocks) used. Wrist measurements differed by -4.0 degrees for ulnar/radial deviation and +5.2 degrees for flexion/extension. Much of the difference between the model and goniometric measurements is believed due to inaccuracies in the goniometric measurements. The proposed model is useful for future investigations of finger-intensive activities by supplying accurate and unbiased measures of joint angles.
引用
收藏
页码:70 / 78
页数:9
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
Chaffin D., 2006, OCCPATIONAL BIOMECHA
[2]  
Clarkson HM, 2000, Musculoskeletal assessment: joint range of motion and manual muscle strength
[3]   A study to compare the reliability of composite finger flexion with goniometry for measurement of range of motion in the hand [J].
Ellis, B ;
Bruton, A .
CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2002, 16 (05) :562-570
[4]   Comparison of measurement accuracy between two types of wrist goniometer systems [J].
Jonsson, P ;
Johnson, PW .
APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 2001, 32 (06) :599-607
[5]   Feasibility of using a video-based motion analysis system for measuring thumb kinematics [J].
Kuo, LC ;
Su, FC ;
Chiu, HY ;
Yu, CY .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2002, 35 (11) :1499-1506
[6]   RELIABILITY OF PASSIVE WRIST FLEXION AND EXTENSION GONIOMETRIC MEASUREMENTS - A MULTICENTER STUDY [J].
LASTAYO, PC ;
WHEELER, DL .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1994, 74 (02) :162-174
[7]   Current techniques for assessing physical exposure to work-related musculoskeletal risks, with emphasis on posture-based methods [J].
Li, GY ;
Buckle, P .
ERGONOMICS, 1999, 42 (05) :674-695
[8]  
MAYERSON NH, 1984, ARCH PHYS MED REHAB, V65, P92
[9]   Finger motion, wrist motion and tendon travel as a function of keyboard angles [J].
Nelson, JE ;
Treaster, DE ;
Marras, WS .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2000, 15 (07) :489-498
[10]   Reliability of the American Medical Association Guides' model for measuring spinal range of motion - Its implication for whole-person impairment rating [J].
Nitschke, JE ;
Nattrass, CL ;
Disler, PB ;
Chou, MJ ;
Ooi, KT .
SPINE, 1999, 24 (03) :262-268