A review of current and emergent biofilm control strategies

被引:828
作者
Simoes, Manuel [1 ]
Simoes, Lucia C. [2 ]
Vieira, Maria J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Porto, Dept Chem Engn, Fac Engn, LEPAE, P-4200465 Oporto, Portugal
[2] Univ Minho, Ctr Biol Engn, IBB, P-4710057 Braga, Portugal
关键词
Biofilm control; Cleaning and disinfection; Dairy biofilms; Enzymes; Interspecies interactions; Microbial metabolites; Phages; STAINLESS-STEEL SURFACES; LISTERIA-MONOCYTOGENES BIOFILMS; EXTRACELLULAR POLYMERIC SUBSTANCES; ESCHERICHIA-COLI O157-H7; DAIRY PROCESSING LINES; TO-CELL SIGNALS; PSEUDOMONAS-AERUGINOSA; FOOD-INDUSTRY; BACTERIAL BIOFILMS; ANTIBIOTIC-RESISTANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.lwt.2009.12.008
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Microbial adhesion to surfaces and the consequent biofilm formation has been documented in many different environments Biofilms constitute a protected mode of growth that allows microorganisms to survival in hostile environments, being their physiology and behavior significantly different from their planktonic counterparts in dairy industry, biofilms may be a source of recalcitrant contaminations, causing food spoilage and are possible sources of public health problems such as outbreaks of foodborne pathogens Biofilms are difficult to eradicate due to their resistant phenotype. However, conventional cleaning and disinfection regimens may also contribute to inefficient biofilm control and to the dissemination of resistance. Consequently, new control strategies are constantly emerging with main incidence in the use of biosolutions (enzymes, phages, interspecies interactions and antimicrobial molecules from microbial origin). The present review will focus on describing the mechanisms involved in biofilm formation and behavior, deleterious effects associated with their presence. and some of the current and emergent control strategies, providing new insight of concern for food industry. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:573 / 583
页数:11
相关论文
共 186 条
[101]   Adhesion of Lactobacillus species in urine and phosphate buffer to silicone rubber and glass under flow [J].
Millsap, KW ;
Reid, G ;
vanderMei, HC ;
Busscher, HJ .
BIOMATERIALS, 1997, 18 (01) :87-91
[102]   Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium swarming mutants with altered biofilm-forming abilities:: Surfactin inhibits biofilm formation [J].
Mireles, JR ;
Toguchi, A ;
Harshey, RM .
JOURNAL OF BACTERIOLOGY, 2001, 183 (20) :5848-5854
[103]   Structure and functional characteristics of bacterial biofilms in fluid processing operations [J].
Mittelman, MW .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 1998, 81 (10) :2760-2764
[104]  
Moretro T., 2004, Biofilms, V1, P107, DOI 10.1017/S1479050504001322
[105]   Consideration of some implications of the resistance of biofilms to biocides [J].
Morton, LHG ;
Greenway, DLA ;
Gaylarde, CC ;
Surman, SB .
INTERNATIONAL BIODETERIORATION & BIODEGRADATION, 1998, 41 (3-4) :247-259
[106]   SANITIZER EFFICACY AGAINST ATTACHED BACTERIA IN A MILK BIOFILM [J].
MOSTELLER, TM ;
BISHOP, JR .
JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION, 1993, 56 (01) :34-41
[107]   Iron salts perturb biofilm formation and disrupt existing biofilms of Pseudomonas aeruginosa [J].
Musk, DJ ;
Banko, DA ;
Hergenrother, PJ .
CHEMISTRY & BIOLOGY, 2005, 12 (07) :789-796
[109]   Biosurfactants in food industry [J].
Nitschke, M. ;
Costa, S. G. V. A. O. .
TRENDS IN FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 18 (05) :252-259
[110]  
NtsamaEssomba C, 1997, VET RES, V28, P353