Robust Estimation of a Random Parameter in a Gaussian Linear Model With Joint Eigenvalue and Elementwise Covariance Uncertainties

被引:10
作者
Mittelman, Roni [1 ]
Miller, Eric L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Elect Engn & Comp Sci, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Tufts Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Medford, MA 02155 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Covariance uncertainty; linear estimation; minimax estimators; minimum mean squared error (MMSE) estimation; regret; robust estimation;
D O I
10.1109/TSP.2009.2036063
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
We consider the estimation of a Gaussian random vector observed through a linear transformation H and corrupted by additive Gaussian noise with a known covariance matrix, where the covariance matrix of is known to lie in a given region of uncertainty that is described using bounds on the eigenvalues and on the elements of the covariance matrix. Recently, two criteria for minimax estimation called difference regret (DR) and ratio regret (RR) were proposed and their closed form solutions were presented assuming that the eigenvalues of the covariance matrix of are known to lie in a given region of uncertainty, and assuming that the matrices H-T C-w(-1) H and C-x are jointly diagonalizable, where C-w and C-x denote the covariance matrices of the additive noise and of respectively. In this work we present a new criterion for the minimax estimation problem which we call the generalized difference regret (GDR), and derive a new minimax estimator which is based on the GDR criterion where the region of uncertainty is defined not only using upper and lower bounds on the eigenvalues of the parameter's covariance matrix, but also using upper and lower bounds on the individual elements of the covariance matrix itself. Furthermore, the new estimator does not require the assumption of joint diagonalizability and it can be obtained efficiently using semidefinite programming. We also show that when the joint diagonalizability assumption holds and when there are only eigenvalue uncertainties, then the new estimator is identical to the difference regret estimator. The experimental results show that we can obtain improved mean squared error (MSE) results compared to the MMSE, DR, and RR estimators.
引用
收藏
页码:1001 / 1011
页数:11
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, GAUSSIAN PROCESSES M
[2]  
[Anonymous], Probability, Random Variables and Stochastic Processes
[3]  
Balakrishnan V., 1998, P 32 ANN C INF SCI S
[4]  
Boyd S., 2004, CONVEX OPTIMIZATION, VFirst, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511804441
[5]  
Brookes M., 2005, The matrix reference manual
[6]   Sensor networks: Evolution, opportunities, and challenges [J].
Chong, CY ;
Kumar, SP .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE, 2003, 91 (08) :1247-1256
[7]   Robust distributed estimation using the embedded subgraphs algorithm [J].
Delouille, Veronique ;
Neelamani, Ramesh Neelsh ;
Baraniuk, Richard G. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2006, 54 (08) :2998-3010
[8]   Minimax MSE-ratio estimation with signal covariance uncertainties [J].
Eldar, YC ;
Merhav, N .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2005, 53 (04) :1335-1347
[9]   A competitive minimax approach to robust estimation of random parameters [J].
Eldar, YC ;
Merhav, N .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2004, 52 (07) :1931-1946
[10]  
Gray R.M., 2005, TOEPLITZ CIRCULANT M