Comparative MRI compatibility of 316L stainless steel alloy and nickel-titanium alloy stents

被引:62
作者
Holton, A [1 ]
Walsh, E [1 ]
Anayiotos, A [1 ]
Pohost, G [1 ]
Venugopalan, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama, Dept Biomed Engn, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
关键词
magnetic resonance angiography; stents; artifacts; lumen visibility;
D O I
10.1081/JCMR-120016381
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The initial success of coronary stenting is leading to a proliferation in peripheral stenting. A significant portion of the stents used in a clinical setting are made of 316 low carbon stainless steel (SS). Other alloys that have been used for stent manufacture include tantalum, MP35N, and nickel-titanium (NiTi). The ferromagnetic properties of SS cause the production of artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The NiTi alloys, in addition to being known for their shape memory or superelastic properties, have been shown to exhibit reduced interference in MRI. Thus, the objective of this study was to determine the comparative MRI compatibility of SS and NiTi stents. Both gradient echo and spin-echo images were obtained at 1.5 and 4.1 T field strengths. The imaging of stents of identical geometry but differing compositions permitted the quantification of artifacts produced due to device composition by normalizing the radio frequency shielding effects. These images were analyzed for magnitude and spatial extent of signal loss within the lumen and outside the stent. B-1 mapping was used to quantify the attenuation throughout the image. The SS stent caused significant signal loss and did not allow for visibility of the lumen. However, the NiTi stent caused only minor artifacting and even allowed for visualization of the signal from within the lumen. In addition, adjustments to the flip angle of standard imaging protocols were shown to improve the quality of signal from within the lumen.
引用
收藏
页码:423 / 430
页数:8
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
*AM SOC TEST MAT, 1998, ANN BOOK ASTM STAND, P7
[2]   MR IMAGING OF LARGE NONFERROMAGNETIC METALLIC IMPLANTS AT 1.5-T [J].
AUGUSTINY, N ;
VONSCHULTHESS, GK ;
MEIER, D ;
BOSIGER, P .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1987, 11 (04) :678-683
[3]   Coronary arteries: Breath-hold, gadolinium-enhanced, three-dimensional MR angiography [J].
Goldfarb, JW ;
Edelman, RR .
RADIOLOGY, 1998, 206 (03) :830-834
[4]   Plain and covered stent-grafts: In vitro evaluation of characteristics at three-dimensional MR angiography [J].
Hilfiker, PR ;
Quick, HH ;
Debatin, JF .
RADIOLOGY, 1999, 211 (03) :693-697
[5]   Coronary arterial stents: Safety and artifacts during MR imaging [J].
Hug, J ;
Nagel, E ;
Bornstedt, A ;
Schnackenburg, B ;
Oswald, H ;
Fleck, E .
RADIOLOGY, 2000, 216 (03) :781-787
[6]   Usefulness of respiratory gated magnetic resonance coronary angiography in assessing narrowings >=50% in diameter native coronary arteries and in aortocoronary bypass conduits [J].
Kessler, W ;
Achenbach, S ;
Moshage, W ;
Zink, D ;
Kroeker, R ;
Nitz, W ;
Laub, G ;
Bachmann, K .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1997, 80 (08) :989-993
[7]  
Klemm T, 2000, J MAGN RESON IMAGING, V12, P606, DOI 10.1002/1522-2586(200010)12:4<606::AID-JMRI14>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-J
[9]   Stent appearance at contrast-enhanced MR Angiography:: In vitro examination with 14 stents [J].
Lenhart, M ;
Völk, M ;
Manke, C ;
Nitz, WR ;
Strotzer, M ;
Feuerbach, S ;
Link, J .
RADIOLOGY, 2000, 217 (01) :173-178
[10]  
MARTELS LW, 2002, MAGNET RESON MED, V47, P171