Systematic Review of the Volume-Outcome Relationship for Radical Prostatectomy

被引:63
作者
Leow, Jeffrey J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Leong, Eugene K. [4 ]
Serrell, Emily C. [5 ]
Chang, Steven L. [1 ,2 ]
Gruen, Russell L. [4 ]
Png, Keng Siang [3 ]
Beaule, Lisa T. [5 ,6 ,7 ]
Quoc-Dien Trinh [1 ,2 ]
Menon, Mani M. [8 ]
Sammond, Jesse D. [5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Urol Surg, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Ctr Surg & Publ Hlth, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Tan Tock Seng Hosp, Dept Urol, Singapore, Singapore
[4] Nanyang Technol Univ Singapore, Lee Kong Chian Sch Med, Imperial Coll London, Singapore, Singapore
[5] Tufts Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02111 USA
[6] Maine Med Ctr, Div Urol, 509 Forest Ave,Suite 200, Portland, ME 04101 USA
[7] Maine Med Ctr, Ctr Outcomes Res & Evaluat, 509 Forest Ave,Suite 200, Portland, ME 04101 USA
[8] Henry Ford Hlth Syst, VUI Ctr Outcomes Res Analyt & Evaluat, Detroit, MI USA
来源
EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS | 2018年 / 4卷 / 06期
关键词
Volume; Caseload; Outcomes; Complications; Mortality; Survival; Radical prostatectomy; Prostate cancer; POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGINS; HOSPITAL VOLUME; SURGEON VOLUME; CANCER-SURGERY; RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY; COMPLICATION RATES; PATIENT OUTCOMES; RESOURCE USE; IMPACT; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.euf.2017.03.008
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Context: Radical prostatectomy (RP) is one of the most complex urological procedures performed. Higher surgical volume has been found previously to be associated with better patient outcomes and reduced costs to the health care system. This has resulted in some regionalization of care toward high-volume facilities and providers; however, the preponderance of RPs is still performed at low-volume institutions. Objective: To provide an updated systematic review of the association of hospital and surgeon volume on patient and system outcomes after RP, including robot-assisted RP. Evidence acquisition: A systematic review of literature was undertaken, searching PubMed (1959-2016) for original articles. Selection criteria included RP, hospital and/or surgeon volumes as predictor variables, categorization of hospital and/or surgeon volumes, and measurable end points. Evidence synthesis: Overall 49 publications fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Most of the studies demonstrated that higher-volume surgeries are associated with better outcomes including reduced mortality, morbidity, postoperative complications, length of stay, readmission, and cost-associated factors. The volume-outcome relationship is maintained in robotic surgery. Eleven studies assessed hospital and surgeon volume simultaneously, and findings reflect that neither is an independent predictor variable affecting outcomes. The studies varied in how volume cutoffs were categorized as well as how the volume-outcome relationship was methodologically evaluated. Conclusions: Contemporary evidence continues to support the relationship between high-volume surgeries with improved RP outcomes. Recent studies demonstrate that the volume-outcome relationship applies to robot-assisted RP and may be applied for potential cost savings in health care. An increase in the number of international studies suggests reproducibility of the association. Although regionalization of surgical care remains a contentious issue, there is an increasing body of evidence that short-term outcomes are improved at high-volume centers for RP. Patient summary: This systematic review of the latest literature found that higher surgical volume was associated with improved outcomes for radical prostatectomy. (C) 2017 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:775 / 789
页数:15
相关论文
共 83 条
  • [1] Impact of Caseload on Total Hospital Charges: A Direct Comparison Between Minimally Invasive and Open Radical Prostatectomy-A Population Based Study
    Abdollah, Firas
    Budaeus, Lars
    Sun, Maxine
    Morgan, Monica
    Johal, Rupinder
    Thuret, Rodolphe
    Zorn, Kevin C.
    Isbarn, Hendrik
    Haese, Alexander
    Jeldres, Claudio
    Perrotte, Paul
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Graefen, Markus
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 185 (03) : 855 - 861
  • [2] Impact of hospital and surgeon volume on mortality and complications after prostatectomy
    Alibhai, Shabbir M. H.
    Leach, Marc
    Tomlinson, George
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 180 (01) : 155 - 162
  • [3] Consumerism and its impact on robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Alkhateeb, Sultan
    Lawrentschuk, Nathan
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 108 (11) : 1874 - 1878
  • [4] The Connection Between Selective Referrals for Radical Cystectomy and Radical Prostatectomy and Volume-Outcome Effects: An Instrumental Variables Analysis
    Allareddy, Veerasathpurush
    Ward, Marcia M.
    Wehby, George L.
    Konety, Badrinath R.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL QUALITY, 2012, 27 (05) : 434 - 440
  • [5] Effect of Meeting Leapfrog Volume Thresholds on Complication Rates Following Complex Surgical Procedures
    Allareddy, Veerasathpurush
    Ward, Marcia M.
    Allareddy, Veerajalandhar
    Konety, Badrinath R.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2010, 251 (02) : 377 - 383
  • [6] Effect of radical prostatectomy surgeon volume on complication rates from a large population-based cohort
    Almatar, Ashraf
    Wallis, Christopher J. D.
    Herschorn, Sender
    Saskin, Refik
    Kulkarni, Girish S.
    Kodama, Ronald T.
    Nam, Robert K.
    [J]. CUAJ-CANADIAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2016, 10 (1-2): : 45 - 49
  • [7] Centralization of Radical Prostatectomy in the United States
    Anderson, Christopher B.
    Penson, David F.
    Ni, Shenghua
    Makarov, Danil V.
    Barocas, Daniel A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 189 (02) : 500 - 506
  • [8] [Anonymous], PROST CANC VERS 3 20
  • [9] [Anonymous], EAU GUIDELINES PROST
  • [10] [Anonymous], 2003, NEW ENGL J MED, DOI DOI 10.1056/NEJMsa035205