Use of posttreatment imaging and biomarkers in survivors of early-stage breast cancer: Inappropriate surveillance or necessary care?

被引:27
作者
Hahn, Erin E. [1 ]
Tang, Tania [1 ]
Lee, Janet S. [1 ]
Munoz-Plaza, Corrine E. [1 ]
Shen, Ernest [1 ]
Rowley, Braden [2 ]
Maeda, Jared L. [3 ]
Mosen, David M. [4 ]
Ruckdeschel, John C. [2 ]
Gould, Michael K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Kaiser Permanente So Calif, Dept Res & Evaluat, 100 S Los Robles Ave, Pasadena, CA 91101 USA
[2] Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[3] Mid Atlantic Permanente Res Inst, Rockville, MD USA
[4] Kaiser Permanente Ctr Hlth Res, Res Response Team, Portland, OR USA
关键词
breast cancer surveillance; Choosing Wisely; guideline adherence; imaging; serum biomarkers; FOLLOW-UP CARE; TOP; 5; LIST; CLINICAL ONCOLOGY; AMERICAN SOCIETY; COSTS;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.29811
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUNDAdvanced imaging and serum biomarkers are commonly used for surveillance in patients with early-stage breast cancer, despite recommendations against this practice. Incentives to perform such low-value testing may be less prominent in integrated health care delivery systems. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate and compare the use of these services within 2 integrated systems: Kaiser Permanente (KP) and Intermountain Healthcare (IH). The authors also sought to distinguish the indication for testing: diagnostic purposes or routine surveillance. METHODSPatients with American Joint Committee on Cancer stage 0 to II breast cancer diagnosed between 2009 and 2010 were identified and the use of imaging and biomarker tests over an 18-month period were quantified, starting at 1 year after diagnosis. Chart abstraction was performed on a random sample of patients who received testing to identify the indication for testing. Multivariate regression was used to explore associations with the use of nonrecommended care. RESULTSA total of 6585 patients were identified; 22% had stage 0 disease, 44% had stage I disease, and 34% had stage II disease. Overall, 24% of patients received at least 1 imaging test (25% at KP vs 22% at IH; P=.009) and 28% of patients received at least 1 biomarker (36% at KP vs 13% at IH; P<.001). Chart abstraction revealed that 84% of imaging tests were performed to evaluate symptoms or signs. Virtually all biomarkers were ordered for routine surveillance. Stage of disease, medical center that provided the services, and provider experience were found to be significantly associated with the use of biomarkers. CONCLUSIONSAdvanced imaging was most often performed for appropriate indications, but biomarkers were used for nonrecommended surveillance. Distinguishing between inappropriate use for surveillance and appropriate diagnostic testing is essential when evaluating adherence to recommendations. Cancer 2016;122:908-16. (c) 2015 American Cancer Society. Advanced imaging and serum biomarkers are commonly used for the surveillance of patients with early-stage breast cancer, despite recommendations against this practice. The results of the current study indicate that the use of these nonrecommended services was common within 2 integrated health care systems. However, the majority of posttreatment imaging was performed for diagnostic purposes, whereas the majority of biomarker tests were for routine surveillance.
引用
收藏
页码:908 / 916
页数:9
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
American Cancer Society, 2012, Cancer Facts Figures 2012
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, DOI DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD001768.PUB2
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, ANAL LONGITUDINAL DA
[4]   Long-Term Psychosocial Consequences of False-Positive Screening Mammography [J].
Brodersen, John ;
Siersma, Volkert Dirk .
ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2013, 11 (02) :106-115
[5]   Use of guideline recommended follow-up care in cancer survivors - Routine or diagnostic indications? [J].
Cooper, Gregory S. ;
Johnson, Christine Cole ;
Lamerato, Lois ;
Poisson, Laila M. ;
Schultz, Lonni ;
Simpkins, Jan ;
Wells, Karen ;
Yood, Marianne Ulcickas ;
Chase, Gary ;
Nathanson, S. David ;
Lafata, Jennifer Elston .
MEDICAL CARE, 2006, 44 (06) :590-594
[6]   INTENSIVE DIAGNOSTIC FOLLOW-UP AFTER TREATMENT OF PRIMARY BREAST-CANCER - A RANDOMIZED TRIAL [J].
DELTURCO, MR ;
PALLI, D ;
CARIDDI, A ;
CIATTO, S ;
PACINI, P ;
DISTANTE, V ;
AZZINI, V ;
BELSANTI, V ;
BARTOLUCCI, R ;
DICOSTANZO, F ;
BERTUSI, M ;
DANESE, S ;
GIARDINA, G ;
DAIUTO, G ;
UCCELLO, V ;
DELEO, G ;
PUNZO, C ;
GOSSO, P ;
GRISO, C ;
LOCATELLI, E ;
MANSUTTI, M ;
SANDRI, P ;
MOLINO, AM ;
SCHINCAGLIA, P ;
TIENGHI, A .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1994, 271 (20) :1593-1597
[7]   Changes in the Use and Costs of Diagnostic Imaging Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Cancer, 1999-2006 [J].
Dinan, Michaela A. ;
Curtis, Lesley H. ;
Hammill, Bradley G. ;
Patz, Edward F., Jr. ;
Abernethy, Amy P. ;
Shea, Alisa M. ;
Schulman, Kevin A. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2010, 303 (16) :1625-1631
[8]   Population-Based Longitudinal Study of Follow-Up Care for Breast Cancer Survivors [J].
Grunfeld, Eva ;
Hodgson, David C. ;
Del Giudice, M. Elisabeth ;
Moineddin, Rahim .
JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2010, 6 (04) :174-181
[9]   Use of Imaging and Biomarker Tests for Posttreatment Care of Early-Stage Breast Cancer Survivors [J].
Hahn, Erin E. ;
Hays, Ron D. ;
Kahn, Katherine L. ;
Litwin, Mark S. ;
Ganz, Patricia A. .
CANCER, 2013, 119 (24) :4316-4324
[10]   Economic outcomes of breast cancer survivorship: CALGB study 79804 [J].
Hensley, ML ;
Dowell, J ;
Herndon, JE ;
Winer, E ;
Stark, N ;
Weeks, JC ;
Paskett, E .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2005, 91 (02) :153-161