A Systematic Review of Open Versus Endovascular Repair of Inflammatory Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

被引:62
|
作者
Paravastu, S. C. V. [1 ]
Ghosh, J. [1 ]
Murray, D. [1 ]
Farquharson, F. G. [1 ]
Serracino-Inglott, F. [1 ]
Walker, M. G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Manchester Royal Infirm, Dept Vasc & Endovasc Surg, Manchester M13 9WL, Lancs, England
关键词
Inflammatory aneurysm; Abdominal aortic aneurysm; Surgery; Endoluminal therapy; EVAR; FOLLOW-UP; RETROPERITONEAL FIBROSIS; PERIANEURYSMAL FIBROSIS; URETERAL OBSTRUCTION; REGRESSION; EXPERIENCE; MANAGEMENT; GRAFT; PROGRESSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejvs.2009.05.005
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysms (IAAAs) have traditionally been treated by open surgical repair (OSR). Over the last decade, endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has been increasingly employed. The optimal treatment option for IAAA remains unclear. This article aims to evaluate and compare outcomes of OSR and EVAR in IAAA repair. Methods: All publications in the English language relating to IAAA were sought electronically using OVID and MEDLINE (1972-2008). Studies identifying 30-day mortality were considered. Periaortic inflammation (PAI), hydronephrosis and 1-year mortality were obtained from studies with at least 1-year computed tomography (CT) follow-up. Outcomes of OSR and EVAR were compared and analysed for statistical significance using Fisher's exact test. Results: The results were obtained from 35 studies comprising 999 patients and 21 studies with 121 patients who underwent OSR and EVAR, respectively. One-year CT follow-up was available for 124 and 52 patients from the two groups, respectively. Thirty-day mortality after OSR was 6% (95% confidence interval (CI); 6-13) and 2% (95% CI; 0-7) after EVAR (p = 0.1). At 1 year, PAI regressed in 73% (95% CI; 64-80) in the OSR group compared to 65% (95% CI; 49-77) of the EVAR group (p = 0.7). Conversely, inflammation progressed in 1% and 4%, respectively (p = 0.1). Forty-five patients undergoing OSR and 29 EVAR were found to have preoperative hydronephrosis. This regressed postoperatively in 69% (95% CI; 53.3-81.8) and 38% (95% CI; 20.6-57.7), respectively (p = 0.01). Hydronephrosis progressed in 9% of patients after OSR and in 21% after EVAR (p = 0.1). New-onset hydronephrosis developed in 6% undergoing OSR compared to 2% with EVAR (p = 0.2). One-year all-cause mortality after OSR was 14% (95% CI; 6-18) compared to 2% (95% CI; 0-13) after EVAR (p = 0.02). Conclusion: Either OSR or EVAR may be considered based on patient suitability. EVAR is associated with lower 1-year mortality compared to OSR. However, OSR may be preferred in those patients who have hydronephrosis and are deemed low risk. (C) 2009 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:291 / 297
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Modern Treatment of Juxtarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms with Fenestrated Endografting and Open Repair - A Systematic Review
    Nordon, I. M.
    Hinchliffe, R. J.
    Holt, P. J.
    Loftus, I. M.
    Thompson, M. M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2009, 38 (01) : 35 - 41
  • [42] Current management of inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysms: a systematic review
    Menegolo, Mirko
    Colacchio, Elda C.
    Piazza, Michele
    Antonello, Michele
    Grego, Franco
    ITALIAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2018, 25 (01): : 50 - 57
  • [43] Predictors of Survival Following Open and Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms
    Matsumura, Jon S.
    Katzen, Barry T.
    Sullivan, Timothy M.
    Dake, Michael D.
    Naftel, David C.
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2009, 23 (02) : 153 - 158
  • [44] Evaluation of Survival Outcomes of Endovascular Versus Open Aortic Repair for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms with a Big Data Approach
    Mei, Hao
    Xu, Yaqing
    Wang, Jiping
    Ma, Shuangge
    ENTROPY, 2020, 22 (12) : 1 - 15
  • [45] Contemporary Outcomes of Endovascular and Open Surgical Repair for Mycotic Aortic Aneurysms: A Systematic Review
    Li, Hai-Lei
    Kwan, Kristine J. S.
    Chan, Yiu Che
    Cheng, Stephen W.
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2024, 100 : 172 - 183
  • [46] Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: The Role of Endovascular Repair
    Gordon, Phyllis A.
    Toursarkissian, Boulos
    AORN JOURNAL, 2014, 100 (03) : 242 - 256
  • [47] Appraisal era for endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms
    Dick, F.
    Brown, L. C.
    Powell, J. T.
    Reise, J.
    Greenhalgh, R. M.
    ACTA CHIRURGICA BELGICA, 2008, 108 (03) : 288 - 291
  • [48] Treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: open surgical repair versus endovascular repair
    Ucles Cabeza, Oscar
    Martinez Lopez, Isaac
    Pla Sanchez, Ferran
    Baturone Blanco, Adriana
    Serrano Hernando, Francisco Javier
    ANGIOLOGIA, 2021, 73 (04): : 173 - 181
  • [49] Anemia and postoperative outcomes after open and endovascular repair of intact abdominal aortic aneurysms
    Dakour-Aridi, Hanaa
    Nejim, Besma
    Locham, Satinderjit
    Alshwaily, Widian
    Malas, Mahmoud B.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2019, 69 (03) : 738 - +
  • [50] Meta-analysis of fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair versus open surgical repair of juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms over the last 10 years
    Jones, A. D.
    Waduud, M. A.
    Walker, P.
    Stocken, D.
    Bailey, M. A.
    Scott, D. J. A.
    BJS OPEN, 2019, 3 (05): : 572 - 584