A Systematic Review of Open Versus Endovascular Repair of Inflammatory Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

被引:62
|
作者
Paravastu, S. C. V. [1 ]
Ghosh, J. [1 ]
Murray, D. [1 ]
Farquharson, F. G. [1 ]
Serracino-Inglott, F. [1 ]
Walker, M. G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Manchester Royal Infirm, Dept Vasc & Endovasc Surg, Manchester M13 9WL, Lancs, England
关键词
Inflammatory aneurysm; Abdominal aortic aneurysm; Surgery; Endoluminal therapy; EVAR; FOLLOW-UP; RETROPERITONEAL FIBROSIS; PERIANEURYSMAL FIBROSIS; URETERAL OBSTRUCTION; REGRESSION; EXPERIENCE; MANAGEMENT; GRAFT; PROGRESSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejvs.2009.05.005
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysms (IAAAs) have traditionally been treated by open surgical repair (OSR). Over the last decade, endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has been increasingly employed. The optimal treatment option for IAAA remains unclear. This article aims to evaluate and compare outcomes of OSR and EVAR in IAAA repair. Methods: All publications in the English language relating to IAAA were sought electronically using OVID and MEDLINE (1972-2008). Studies identifying 30-day mortality were considered. Periaortic inflammation (PAI), hydronephrosis and 1-year mortality were obtained from studies with at least 1-year computed tomography (CT) follow-up. Outcomes of OSR and EVAR were compared and analysed for statistical significance using Fisher's exact test. Results: The results were obtained from 35 studies comprising 999 patients and 21 studies with 121 patients who underwent OSR and EVAR, respectively. One-year CT follow-up was available for 124 and 52 patients from the two groups, respectively. Thirty-day mortality after OSR was 6% (95% confidence interval (CI); 6-13) and 2% (95% CI; 0-7) after EVAR (p = 0.1). At 1 year, PAI regressed in 73% (95% CI; 64-80) in the OSR group compared to 65% (95% CI; 49-77) of the EVAR group (p = 0.7). Conversely, inflammation progressed in 1% and 4%, respectively (p = 0.1). Forty-five patients undergoing OSR and 29 EVAR were found to have preoperative hydronephrosis. This regressed postoperatively in 69% (95% CI; 53.3-81.8) and 38% (95% CI; 20.6-57.7), respectively (p = 0.01). Hydronephrosis progressed in 9% of patients after OSR and in 21% after EVAR (p = 0.1). New-onset hydronephrosis developed in 6% undergoing OSR compared to 2% with EVAR (p = 0.2). One-year all-cause mortality after OSR was 14% (95% CI; 6-18) compared to 2% (95% CI; 0-13) after EVAR (p = 0.02). Conclusion: Either OSR or EVAR may be considered based on patient suitability. EVAR is associated with lower 1-year mortality compared to OSR. However, OSR may be preferred in those patients who have hydronephrosis and are deemed low risk. (C) 2009 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:291 / 297
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Endovascular repair for abdominal aortic aneurysms
    Debono, Samuel
    Nash, Jennifer
    Tambyraja, Andrew L.
    Newby, David E.
    Forsythe, Rachael O.
    HEART, 2021, 107 (22) : 1783 - 1789
  • [32] Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms in the Presence of a Transplanted Kidney
    Silverberg, Daniel
    Yalon, Tal
    Halak, Moshe
    CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2015, 38 (04) : 833 - 839
  • [33] Totally percutaneous endovascular repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms
    Tay, Shirli
    Zaghloul, Mohamed S.
    Shafqat, Mehreen
    Yang, Chao
    Desai, Kshitij A.
    De Silva, Gayan
    Sanchez, Luis A.
    Zayed, Mohamed A.
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2022, 9
  • [34] A Comparison of Endovascular Aneurysm Repair and Open Repair for Ruptured Aortic Abdominal Aneurysms
    Alnefaie, Samaher A.
    Alzahrani, Yasser A.
    Alzahrani, Bashair S.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (06)
  • [35] Fenestrated and chimney endovascular aneurysm repair versus open surgery for complex abdominal aortic aneurysms
    Sala-Almonacil, Vicente A.
    Zaragoza-Garcia, Jose M.
    Ramirez-Montoya, Mauricio
    Molina-Nacher, Vicente
    Martinez-Perello, Inmaculada
    Gomez-Palones, Francisco J.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2017, 58 (06): : 801 - 813
  • [36] Endovascular Treatment versus Open Repair for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: The Influence of Fitness in Decision Making
    Moulakakis, Konstnatinos G.
    Dalainas, Ilias
    Kakisis, John
    Mylonas, Spyridon
    Liapis, Christos D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANGIOLOGY, 2013, 22 (01) : 9 - 12
  • [37] Chimney Versus Fenestrated Endovascular Versus Open Repair for Juxta/Pararenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of the Short-term Results
    Zlatanovic, Petar
    Jovanovic, Aleksa
    Tripodi, Paolo
    Davidovic, Lazar
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 47 (03) : 803 - 823
  • [38] Candidates and major determinants for endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms in Korean patients
    Lee, Joo Myung
    Lim, Cheong
    Youn, Tae-Jin
    Chun, Eun Ju
    Choi, Sang-Il
    Cho, Young-Seok
    Cho, Goo-Yeong
    Chae, In-Ho
    Park, Kay-Hyun
    Choi, Dong-Ju
    HEART AND VESSELS, 2013, 28 (02) : 215 - 221
  • [39] Systematic review of endovascular stent grafting versus open surgical repair for the elective treatment of arch/descending thoracic aortic aneurysms
    McCarthy, Andrew
    Gray, Joanne
    Sastry, Priya
    Sharples, Linda
    Vale, Luke
    Cook, Andrew
    Mcmeekin, Peter
    Freeman, Carol
    Catarino, Pedro
    Large, Stephen
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (03):
  • [40] Long-term outcomes and resource utilization of endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms in Ontario
    Jetty, Prasad
    Hebert, Paul
    van Walraven, Carl
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2010, 51 (03) : 577 - 583