A Systematic Review of Open Versus Endovascular Repair of Inflammatory Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

被引:62
|
作者
Paravastu, S. C. V. [1 ]
Ghosh, J. [1 ]
Murray, D. [1 ]
Farquharson, F. G. [1 ]
Serracino-Inglott, F. [1 ]
Walker, M. G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Manchester Royal Infirm, Dept Vasc & Endovasc Surg, Manchester M13 9WL, Lancs, England
关键词
Inflammatory aneurysm; Abdominal aortic aneurysm; Surgery; Endoluminal therapy; EVAR; FOLLOW-UP; RETROPERITONEAL FIBROSIS; PERIANEURYSMAL FIBROSIS; URETERAL OBSTRUCTION; REGRESSION; EXPERIENCE; MANAGEMENT; GRAFT; PROGRESSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejvs.2009.05.005
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysms (IAAAs) have traditionally been treated by open surgical repair (OSR). Over the last decade, endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has been increasingly employed. The optimal treatment option for IAAA remains unclear. This article aims to evaluate and compare outcomes of OSR and EVAR in IAAA repair. Methods: All publications in the English language relating to IAAA were sought electronically using OVID and MEDLINE (1972-2008). Studies identifying 30-day mortality were considered. Periaortic inflammation (PAI), hydronephrosis and 1-year mortality were obtained from studies with at least 1-year computed tomography (CT) follow-up. Outcomes of OSR and EVAR were compared and analysed for statistical significance using Fisher's exact test. Results: The results were obtained from 35 studies comprising 999 patients and 21 studies with 121 patients who underwent OSR and EVAR, respectively. One-year CT follow-up was available for 124 and 52 patients from the two groups, respectively. Thirty-day mortality after OSR was 6% (95% confidence interval (CI); 6-13) and 2% (95% CI; 0-7) after EVAR (p = 0.1). At 1 year, PAI regressed in 73% (95% CI; 64-80) in the OSR group compared to 65% (95% CI; 49-77) of the EVAR group (p = 0.7). Conversely, inflammation progressed in 1% and 4%, respectively (p = 0.1). Forty-five patients undergoing OSR and 29 EVAR were found to have preoperative hydronephrosis. This regressed postoperatively in 69% (95% CI; 53.3-81.8) and 38% (95% CI; 20.6-57.7), respectively (p = 0.01). Hydronephrosis progressed in 9% of patients after OSR and in 21% after EVAR (p = 0.1). New-onset hydronephrosis developed in 6% undergoing OSR compared to 2% with EVAR (p = 0.2). One-year all-cause mortality after OSR was 14% (95% CI; 6-18) compared to 2% (95% CI; 0-13) after EVAR (p = 0.02). Conclusion: Either OSR or EVAR may be considered based on patient suitability. EVAR is associated with lower 1-year mortality compared to OSR. However, OSR may be preferred in those patients who have hydronephrosis and are deemed low risk. (C) 2009 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:291 / 297
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Endovascular repair versus open repair for inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysms
    Capoccia, Laura
    Riambau, Vicente
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2015, (04):
  • [2] Open Versus Fenestrated Endovascular Repair of Complex Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms
    O'Donnell, Thomas F. X.
    Boitano, Laura T.
    Deery, Sarah E.
    Schermerhorn, Marc L.
    Schanzer, Andres
    Beck, Adam W.
    Green, Richard M.
    Takayama, Hiroo
    Patel, Virendra, I
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2020, 271 (05) : 969 - 977
  • [3] Open and endovascular repair of juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms: a systematic review
    Belczak, Sergio Quilici
    Lanziotti, Luiz
    Botelho, Yuri
    Aun, Ricardo
    da Silva, Erasmo Simao
    Puech-Leao, Pedro
    de Luccia, Nelson
    CLINICS, 2014, 69 (09) : 641 - 646
  • [4] Outcomes of open and endovascular repair of inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysms
    Duque Santos, Africa
    Reyes Valdivia, Andres
    Romero Lozano, Maria Asuncion
    Aracil Sanus, Enrique
    Ocana Guaita, Julia
    Gandarias, Claudio
    VASCULAR, 2018, 26 (02) : 203 - 208
  • [5] Cost-Effectiveness of Endovascular Aneurysm Repair Versus Open Surgical Repair for Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: A Systematic Review
    Dolatshahi, Zeinab
    Mezginejad, Fateme
    Nargesi, Shahin
    Saliminejad, Moslem
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 18 (03)
  • [6] Endovascular repair versus open repair in the treatment of ruptured aortic aneurysms: a systematic review
    Amato, Bruno
    Fugetto, Francesco
    Compagna, Rita
    Zurlo, Valeria
    Barbetta, Andrea
    Petrella, Giuseppe
    Aprea, Giovanni
    Danzi, Michele
    Rocca, Aldo
    de Franciscis, Stefano
    Serra, Raffaele
    MINERVA CHIRURGICA, 2019, 74 (06) : 472 - 480
  • [7] Endovascular Repair Versus Open Surgical Repair for Complex Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Zhang, Kun
    Zheng, Huanqin
    Hu, Zhongzhou
    Liang, Zike
    Hao, Yongchen
    Chen, Zhong
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2023, 93 : 355 - 368
  • [8] Open versus endovascular repair of primary infected thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysms
    Kritayakirana, Kritaya
    Narueponjirakul, Natawat
    Aimsupanimitr, Punthita
    Chaichote, Chonlathorn
    Uthaipaisanwong, Apinan
    Kittayarak, Chanapong
    VASCULAR, 2024, 32 (02) : 262 - 266
  • [9] Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Endovascular Repair
    Jim, Jeffrey
    Sanchez, Luis A.
    MOUNT SINAI JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2010, 77 (03): : 238 - 249
  • [10] Endovascular repair of inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysms
    Hinchliffe, RJ
    Macierewicz, JA
    Hopkinson, BR
    JOURNAL OF ENDOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2002, 9 (03) : 277 - 281