Pollution abatement costs and foreign direct investment inflows to US states

被引:313
作者
Keller, W [1 ]
Levinson, A
机构
[1] Univ Texas, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[2] Georgetown Univ, Washington, DC 20057 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1162/003465302760556503
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper estimates the effect of changing environmental standards on patterns of international investment. The analysis advances the existing literature in three ways. First, we avoid comparing different countries by examining foreign direct investment in the United States and differences in pollution abatement costs among U.S. states. Data on environmental costs in U.S. states are more comparable than those for different countries, and U.S. states are more similar in other difficult-to-measure dimensions. Second, we allow for differences in states' industrial compositions, an acknowledged problem for earlier studies. Third, we employ an 18-year panel of relative abatement costs, allowing us to control for unobserved state characteristics. We find robust evidence that abatement costs have had moderate deterrent effects on foreign investment.
引用
收藏
页码:691 / 703
页数:13
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
*ADV COMM INT REL, 1988, STAT FISC CAP EFF
[2]  
Amemiya Takeshi., 1985, Advanced Econometrics
[3]   SOME TESTS OF SPECIFICATION FOR PANEL DATA - MONTE-CARLO EVIDENCE AND AN APPLICATION TO EMPLOYMENT EQUATIONS [J].
ARELLANO, M ;
BOND, S .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1991, 58 (02) :277-297
[4]  
Baltagi B.H., 2008, Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, V3rd ed.
[5]   Environmental regulation and productivity: Evidence from oil refineries [J].
Berman, E ;
Bui, LTM .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2001, 83 (03) :498-510
[6]  
Bhagwati J.N., 1996, FAIR TRADE HARMONIZA
[7]  
*BUR EC AN, ANN SER BUR EC AN
[8]  
Cameron AC., 1998, REGRESSION ANAL COUN, DOI [10.1017/CBO9780511814365, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511814365]
[9]  
CONGLETON RD, 1992, REV EC STAT, V74
[10]   STRATEGIC INTERACTION AMONG NATIONS - NEGOTIABLE AND NONNEGOTIABLE TRADE BARRIERS [J].
COPELAND, BR .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D ECONOMIQUE, 1990, 23 (01) :84-108