Development of the business feasibility evaluation model for a profitable P2P electricity trading by estimating the optimal trading price

被引:23
作者
An, Jongbaek [1 ]
Hong, Taehoon [1 ]
Lee, Minhyun [2 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Dept Architecture & Architectural Engn, Seoul 03722, South Korea
[2] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Bldg & Real Estate, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Optimal trading price of electricity; Peer-to-Peer electricity trading; Energy prosumer; Levelized cost of electricity; Business feasibility evaluation; Genetic algorithm; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION MODEL; SOLAR PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEMS; EMISSIONS REDUCTION; ENERGY; CARBON; COST; PERFORMANCE; TARGET;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126138
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
For the market participants (i.e., energy consumers and prosumers) in a microgrid to acquire profits via trading surplus electricity, it is essential to determine an appropriate trading price of electricity. Therefore, this study developed a business feasibility evaluation model to predict the optimal trading price of electricity that maximizes the profits of both the market participants participating in the Peer-to Peer (P2P) electricity trading, by reflecting the structure of electricity market in South Korea. The residential areas located in the seven metropolitan cities in South Korea (Seoul, Incheon, Daejeon, Daegu, Ulsan, Busan, and Gwangju) were selected for the model application. The main findings from the model application are as follows. First, the annual electricity generation of the solar photovoltaic (PV) panel was highest in Daegu (5,541 kWh) and lowest in Seoul (3,569 kWh). In addition, the electricity generation was generally shown to be higher in spring (MarcheMay) and relatively lower in summer and winter. Second, the estimated annual maximum profit of the energy prosumer was highest in Daegu (US$995.5) and lowest in Seoul (US$638.1). Furthermore, it was determined to be beneficial to the energy prosumers to reduce their self-use rate to the extent possible. By using the developed business feasibility evaluation model, decision makers, including specialists and non-specialists, can determine the optimal trading price of electricity and whether to participate in the market of P2P electricity trading. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 51 条
[11]   Comparative economic analysis of supporting policies for residential solar PV in the United States: Solar Renewable Energy Credit (SREC) potential [J].
Burns, John Edward ;
Kang, Jin-Su .
ENERGY POLICY, 2012, 44 :217-225
[12]  
Caramia M, 2008, MULTIOBJECTIVE MANAG
[13]   Environmental and economic aspects of higher RES penetration into Macedonian power system [J].
Cosic, Boris ;
Markovska, Natasa ;
Krajacic, Goran ;
Taseska, Verica ;
Duic, Neven .
APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2012, 43 :158-162
[14]   Assumptions and the levelized cost of energy for photovoltaics [J].
Darling, Seth B. ;
You, Fengqi ;
Veselka, Thomas ;
Velosa, Alfonso .
ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2011, 4 (09) :3133-3139
[15]   THE POTENTIAL OF RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES FOR GREENHOUSE GASES EMISSIONS REDUCTION IN MACEDONIA [J].
Dedinec, Aleksandar ;
Markovska, Natasa ;
Taseska, Verica ;
Kanevce, Gligor ;
Bosevski, Tome ;
Pop-Jordanov, Jordan .
THERMAL SCIENCE, 2012, 16 (03) :717-728
[16]   India's CO2 emissions pathways to 2050: Energy system, economic and fossil fuel impacts with and without carbon permit trading [J].
Gambhir, Ajay ;
Napp, Tamaryn A. ;
Emmott, Christopher J. M. ;
Anandarajah, Gabrial .
ENERGY, 2014, 77 :791-801
[17]  
Green MA, 2020, PROG PHOTOVOLTAICS, V28, P3, DOI [10.1002/pip.3171, 10.1002/pip.3228]
[18]  
Hoon J., 2016, DOMESTIC OVERSEAS PV
[19]   Optimal building envelope design based on simulated performance: History, current status and new potentials [J].
Huang, Yu ;
Niu, Jian-lei .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2016, 117 :387-398
[20]   Perovskite solar cells: An integrated hybrid lifecycle assessment and review in comparison with other photovoltaic technologies [J].
Ibn-Mohammed, T. ;
Koh, S. C. L. ;
Reaney, I. M. ;
Acquaye, A. ;
Schileo, G. ;
Mustapha, K. B. ;
Greenough, R. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 80 :1321-1344