Anesthesia for Cesarean Section: Retrospective Comparative Study

被引:14
作者
Al-Husban, Naser [1 ]
Elmuhtaseb, Mohammad Sami [1 ]
Al-Husban, Hedaieh [2 ]
Nabhan, Mohammed [3 ]
Abuhalaweh, Hamza [3 ]
Alkhatib, Yasmine Mohamed [3 ]
Yousef, Maysa [3 ]
Aloran, Bayan [3 ]
Elyyan, Yousef [3 ]
Alghazo, Asma [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Jordan, Fac Med, POB 2194, Amman 11941, Jordan
[2] Eye Specialty Hosp, Al Noor Fertil Ctr, Amman, Jordan
[3] Jordan Univ Hosp, Obstet & Gynecol Dept, Amman, Jordan
关键词
cesarean section; spinal; epidural; general; anesthesia; feto-maternal; outcome; GENERAL-ANESTHESIA; SPINAL-ANESTHESIA; EPIDURAL-ANESTHESIA; MATERNAL DEATH; PAIN SCORES; BLOOD-LOSS; DELIVERY; 21ST-CENTURY; PREVENTION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.2147/IJWH.S292434
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: Cesarean section is a widely performed surgery. Objective: To compare anesthetic types regarding feto-matemal outcomes. Materials and Methods: Retrospective comparative study of 3599 cesarean sections (emergency and elective categories). Results: Mean APGAR score was statistically higher in the spinal than general anesthesia among the emergency category, P = 0.000 and 0.026, respectively, with no significant difference in the elective category. Estimated blood loss among the elective category was statistically significantly higher in the spinal than general anesthesia, P = 0.001. However, among the emergency category, it was significantly higher in the general than in spinal or epidural anesthesia, P = 0.000. Diclofenac sodium was used more after spinal than general anesthesia (P = 0.000), with no significant difference between epidural and general or between epidural and spinal anesthesia. Pethidine hydrochloride (HCL) was used more after general than after spinal anesthesia (P = 0.000). However, pethidine HCL use was not statistically significantly different between spinal and epidural anesthesia. In the elective category, paracetamol was requested more after spinal than epidural or general anesthesia, P = 0.000. No significant difference was seen between epidural and general anesthesia, P = 1.000. No statistically significant difference was found among the anesthetic types in both categories regarding tramadol HCL. Length of hospital stay, operative time and neonatal intensive care unit admission were not statistically different between anesthetic modes. In the emergency category, significantly higher percentage of patients were satisfied with and would recommend epidural anesthesia. Conclusion: There was no statistically significant difference among the three types of anesthesia regarding neonatal intensive care admission and length of hospital stay for emergency and elective categories. APGAR score was higher with spinal than with general anesthesia in the emergency category with no significant difference in the elective category. More diclofenac sodium and paracetamol and less opioids were used after regional than after general anesthesia. Satisfaction was higher with epidural anesthesia. Limitations: Retrospective and single centered.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 152
页数:12
相关论文
共 26 条
[11]  
El Aish Khaled Abu, 2018, Lancet, V391 Suppl 2, pS20, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30386-6
[12]   Failed spinal anaesthesia: mechanisms, management, and prevention [J].
Fettes, P. D. W. ;
Jansson, J. -R. ;
Wildsmith, J. A. W. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2009, 102 (06) :739-748
[13]   The Effect of Spinal versus General Anesthesia on Quality of Life in Women Undergoing Cesarean Delivery on Maternal Request [J].
Ghaffari, Sina ;
Dehghanpisheh, Laleh ;
Tavakkoli, Fahimeh ;
Mahmoudi, Hilda .
CUREUS, 2018, 10 (12)
[14]   A retrospective review of 10-year trends in general anesthesia for cesarean delivery at a university hospital: the impact of a newly launched team on obstetric anesthesia practice [J].
Ikeda, Takamitsu ;
Kato, Atsuko ;
Bougaki, Masahiko ;
Araki, Yuko ;
Ohata, Takuya ;
Kawashima, Seiichiro ;
Imai, Yousuke ;
Ninagawa, Jun ;
Oba, Koji ;
Chang, Kyungho ;
Uchida, Kanji ;
Yamada, Yoshitsugu .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2020, 20 (01)
[15]   Venous thromboembolism during pregnancy and the postpartum period: Incidence, risk factors, and mortality [J].
James, AH ;
Jamison, MG ;
Brancazio, LR ;
Myers, ER .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 194 (05) :1311-1315
[16]   Pregnancy and thrombotic risk [J].
James, Andra H. .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2010, 38 (02) :S57-S63
[17]   Comparison between general, spinal, epidural, and combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery: a network meta-analysis [J].
Kim, W. H. ;
Hur, M. ;
Park, S. -K. ;
Yoo, S. ;
Lim, T. ;
Yoon, H. K. ;
Kim, J. -T. ;
Bahk, J. -H. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA, 2019, 37 :5-15
[18]   Category-1 caesarean section: a survey of anaesthetic and peri-operative management in the UK [J].
Kinsella, S. M. ;
Walton, B. ;
Sashidharan, R. ;
Draycott, T. .
ANAESTHESIA, 2010, 65 (04) :362-368
[19]  
KINSELLA SM, 1994, OBSTET GYNECOL, V83, P774
[20]   Postoperative pain after cesarean section: assessment and management in a tertiary hospital in a low-income country [J].
Kintu, Andrew ;
Abdulla, Sadiq ;
Lubikire, Aggrey ;
Nabukenya, Mary T. ;
Igaga, Elizabeth ;
Bulamba, Fred ;
Semakula, Daniel ;
Olufolabi, Adeyemi J. .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2019, 19 (1)