Anesthesia for Cesarean Section: Retrospective Comparative Study

被引:14
作者
Al-Husban, Naser [1 ]
Elmuhtaseb, Mohammad Sami [1 ]
Al-Husban, Hedaieh [2 ]
Nabhan, Mohammed [3 ]
Abuhalaweh, Hamza [3 ]
Alkhatib, Yasmine Mohamed [3 ]
Yousef, Maysa [3 ]
Aloran, Bayan [3 ]
Elyyan, Yousef [3 ]
Alghazo, Asma [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Jordan, Fac Med, POB 2194, Amman 11941, Jordan
[2] Eye Specialty Hosp, Al Noor Fertil Ctr, Amman, Jordan
[3] Jordan Univ Hosp, Obstet & Gynecol Dept, Amman, Jordan
关键词
cesarean section; spinal; epidural; general; anesthesia; feto-maternal; outcome; GENERAL-ANESTHESIA; SPINAL-ANESTHESIA; EPIDURAL-ANESTHESIA; MATERNAL DEATH; PAIN SCORES; BLOOD-LOSS; DELIVERY; 21ST-CENTURY; PREVENTION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.2147/IJWH.S292434
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: Cesarean section is a widely performed surgery. Objective: To compare anesthetic types regarding feto-matemal outcomes. Materials and Methods: Retrospective comparative study of 3599 cesarean sections (emergency and elective categories). Results: Mean APGAR score was statistically higher in the spinal than general anesthesia among the emergency category, P = 0.000 and 0.026, respectively, with no significant difference in the elective category. Estimated blood loss among the elective category was statistically significantly higher in the spinal than general anesthesia, P = 0.001. However, among the emergency category, it was significantly higher in the general than in spinal or epidural anesthesia, P = 0.000. Diclofenac sodium was used more after spinal than general anesthesia (P = 0.000), with no significant difference between epidural and general or between epidural and spinal anesthesia. Pethidine hydrochloride (HCL) was used more after general than after spinal anesthesia (P = 0.000). However, pethidine HCL use was not statistically significantly different between spinal and epidural anesthesia. In the elective category, paracetamol was requested more after spinal than epidural or general anesthesia, P = 0.000. No significant difference was seen between epidural and general anesthesia, P = 1.000. No statistically significant difference was found among the anesthetic types in both categories regarding tramadol HCL. Length of hospital stay, operative time and neonatal intensive care unit admission were not statistically different between anesthetic modes. In the emergency category, significantly higher percentage of patients were satisfied with and would recommend epidural anesthesia. Conclusion: There was no statistically significant difference among the three types of anesthesia regarding neonatal intensive care admission and length of hospital stay for emergency and elective categories. APGAR score was higher with spinal than with general anesthesia in the emergency category with no significant difference in the elective category. More diclofenac sodium and paracetamol and less opioids were used after regional than after general anesthesia. Satisfaction was higher with epidural anesthesia. Limitations: Retrospective and single centered.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 152
页数:12
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Blood loss in elective cesarean section: is there a difference related to the type of anesthesia? A randomized prospective study [J].
Aksoy, Huseyin ;
Aksoy, Ulku ;
Yucel, Burak ;
Ozyurt, Sezin Saygi ;
Acmaz, Gokhan ;
Babayigit, Mustafa Alparslan ;
Gokahmetoglu, Gunhan ;
Aydin, Turgut .
JOURNAL OF THE TURKISH-GERMAN GYNECOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, 2015, 16 (03) :158-163
[2]   Postoperative Visual Analog Pain Scores and Overall Anesthesia Patient Satisfaction [J].
Burch, Tony ;
Seipel, Scott J. ;
Coyle, Nina ;
Ortega, Keri H. ;
DeJesus, Ozzie .
CRITICAL CARE NURSING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2017, 29 (04) :419-+
[3]  
Carvalho B, 2017, BEST PRACT RES-CLIN, V31, P69, DOI 10.1016/j.bpa.2017.01.003
[4]   Comparison of Effects of General Anesthesia and Combined Spinal/Epidural Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery on Umbilical Cord Blood Gas Values: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Study [J].
Chen, Yi ;
Liu, Weiwei ;
Gong, Xuan ;
Cheng, Qiuju .
MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2019, 25 :5272-5279
[5]   Maternal death in the 21st century: Clark et al [J].
Clark, S. L. ;
Belfort, M. A. ;
Dildy, G. A. ;
Herbst, M. A. ;
Meyers, J. A. ;
Hankins, G. D., V .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 199 (01) :91-92
[6]   Discussion: "Maternal death in the 21st century: causes, prevention, and relationship to cesarean delivery" by Clark et al [J].
Clark, S. L. ;
Belfort, M. A. ;
Dildy, G. A. ;
Herbst, M. A. ;
Meyers, J. A. ;
Hankins, G. D., V .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 199 (01) :E7-E11
[7]   Improved Estimation of Blood Loss at Time of Cesarean Section Using a Quantitative Approach [J].
Conly, Bethany ;
Sylla, Ricci ;
Lee, Kimberly ;
Wei, Julia .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 129 :140S-140S
[8]   General anesthesia for caesarean section [J].
Devroe, Sarah ;
Van de Velde, Marc ;
Rex, Steffen .
CURRENT OPINION IN ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2015, 28 (03) :240-246
[9]   Prospective, randomized trial comparing general with spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery in preeclamptic patients with a nonreassuring fetal heart trace [J].
Dyer, RA ;
Els, I ;
Farbas, J ;
Torr, GJ ;
Schoeman, LK ;
James, MF .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2003, 99 (03) :561-569
[10]   Effect of anaesthetic technique on neonatal morbidity in emergency caesarean section for foetal distress [J].
Edipoglu, Ipek Saadet ;
Celik, Fatma ;
Marangoz, Elif Cirakoglu ;
Orcan, Gulin Haroglu .
PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (11)