Actor relations in climate policymaking: Governing decarbonisation in a corporatist green state

被引:28
作者
Kronsell, Annica [1 ]
Khan, Jamil [2 ]
Hildingsson, Roger [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gothenburg, Sch Global Studies, Box 115, S-40530 Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Lund Univ, Environm & Energy Syst Studies, Lund, Sweden
[3] Lund Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Lund, Sweden
关键词
climate policy; corporatism; ecological democracy; green state; sustainability transition; MULTILEVEL PERSPECTIVE; TRANSITIONS; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1002/eet.1867
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This article focuses on the role of actor relations in advancing climate policymaking and argues that attempts to understand decisions to decarbonise in a green state should explore the institutional conditions for policymaking. The article explores the climate policy model in Sweden in terms of the societal actors included in the policy process, the nature of this inclusion, and its relevance for the prospects of decarbonisation. It uses three perspectives in the analysis: corporatism, sustainable transition studies, and ecological democracy. The findings largely support existing research that states characterised by corporatist policymaking are suited for environmental governance and for climate policymaking. However, as a model of governance of actor relations, the Swedish climate policymaking model has both its merits and demerits. Although it has potential to reach decarbonisation objectives, it does this in the context of including mainly established economic interests, that is, incumbents. This stands in contrast with what is argued in sustainable transition studies that incumbents obstruct change, in the Swedish case they are viewed as potential change agents. Finally, although the character of the actor relations is deliberative, it is a top-down exclusive kind of deliberation that remains far from ideals of ecological democracy.
引用
收藏
页码:399 / 408
页数:10
相关论文
共 56 条
[21]   Regime Resistance against Low-Carbon Transitions: Introducing Politics and Power into the Multi-Level Perspective [J].
Geels, Frank W. .
THEORY CULTURE & SOCIETY, 2014, 31 (05) :21-40
[22]   Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study [J].
Geels, FW .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2002, 31 (8-9) :1257-1274
[23]  
Goodin RobertE., 2008, INNOVATING DEMOCRACY
[24]   Divergent neighbors: corporatism and climate policy networks in Finland and Sweden [J].
Gronow, Antti ;
Yla-Anttila, Tuomas ;
Carson, Marcus ;
Edling, Christofer .
ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 2019, 28 (06) :1061-1083
[25]  
Hildingsson R., 2017, INTERVJUSTUDIE FORUT
[26]   The green state and industrial decarbonisation [J].
Hildingsson, Roger ;
Kronsell, Annica ;
Khan, Jamil .
ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 2019, 28 (05) :909-928
[27]  
Hildingsson R, 2010, ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS AND DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRACY: EXAMINING THE PROMISE OF NEW MODES OF GOVERNANCE, P145
[28]  
Humphrey Mathew., 2007, Ecological Politics and Democratic Theory
[29]  
Hunold C., 2005, The State and the Global Ecological Crisis, P75
[30]   Changing of the guard: trends in corporatist arrangements in 42 highly industrialized societies from 1960 to 2010 [J].
Jahn, Detlef .
SOCIO-ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2016, 14 (01) :47-71