Longterm Results of a Screening Procedure for Adult Cochlear Implant Candidates

被引：11
作者：
Hoppe, Ulrich [1 ]
Hocke, Thomas [2 ]
Hast, Anne [1 ]
Hornung, Joachim [3 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Klinikum Erlangen, Hals Nasen Ohren Klin, Audiol Abt, Waldstr 1, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany
[2] Cochlear Deutschland, Hannover, Germany
[3] Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, HNO Klin, Kopf & Halschirurg, Erlangen, Germany
来源：
LARYNGO-RHINO-OTOLOGIE | 2017年 / 96卷 / 04期
关键词：
cochlear implants; hearing aids; screening; speech audiometry; indications; MUSIC PERCEPTION; HEARING-LOSS; AUDIOMETRY; BENEFITS; AID;
D O I：
10.1055/s-0042-117641
中图分类号：
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号：
100213 ;
摘要：
Objective This study gives an estimation of the long term outcome of a screening procedure for cochlear implant candidacy in hearing aid users. Methods In a recent retrospective study, hearing aid performance and audiometric measures in 185 subjects (318 ears) were analyzed. In the context of 2 years follow-up, the outcome of the ipsilateral screening procedure was analyzed. For patients who did receive a cochlear implant, their audiometric outcome measures were viewed into relation to their preoperative results. Results From the 96 ears identified as cochlear implant candidates, 34 were provided with a cochlear implant. 222 ears were identified as hearing aid users. Only 4 of these 222 ears were provided with a cochlear implant. Cochlear implant recipients with a preoperative speech recognition score with hearing aids above zero showed a mean improvement of 65 % points in Freiburg monosyllabics. Conclusion The audiometry-based screening procedure enables an effective management of the referral process of cochlear implant candidates.
引用
收藏
页码：234 / 238
页数：5
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Blamey P, 1996, Audiol Neurootol, V1, P293
  • [2] Factors Affecting Auditory Performance of Postlinguistically Deaf Adults Using Cochlear Implants: An Update with 2251 Patients
    Blamey, Peter
    Artieres, Franoise
    Baskent, Deniz
    Bergeron, Francois
    Beynon, Andy
    Burke, Elaine
    Dillier, Norbert
    Dowell, Richard
    Fraysse, Bernard
    Gallego, Stephane
    Govaerts, Paul J.
    Green, Kevin
    Huber, Alexander M.
    Kleine-Punte, Andrea
    Maat, Bert
    Marx, Mathieu
    Mawman, Deborah
    Mosnier, Isabelle
    O'Connor, Alec Fitzgerald
    O'Leary, Stephen
    Rousset, Alexandra
    Schauwers, Karen
    Skarzynski, Henryk
    Skarzynski, Piotr H.
    Sterkers, Olivier
    Terranti, Assia
    Truy, Eric
    Van de Heyning, Paul
    Venail, Frederic
    Vincent, Christophe
    Lazard, Diane S.
    [J]. AUDIOLOGY AND NEURO-OTOLOGY, 2013, 18 (01) : 36 - 47
  • [3] Chundu S, 2013, COCHL IMPL INT, V14, P9
  • [4] Comparison of Bimodal and Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users on Speech Recognition With Competing Talker, Music Perception, Affective Prosody Discrimination, and Talker Identification
    Cullington, Helen E.
    Zeng, Fan-Gang
    [J]. EAR AND HEARING, 2011, 32 (01) : 16 - 30
  • [5] De Raeve L, 2013, COCHL IMPL INT, V14, P18
  • [6] How Much Residual Hearing Is 'Useful' for Music Perception with Cochlear Implants?
    El Fata, Fouad
    James, Chris J.
    Laborde, Marie-Laurence
    Fraysse, Bernard
    [J]. AUDIOLOGY AND NEURO-OTOLOGY, 2009, 14 : 14 - 21
  • [7] Evidence for the Expansion of Adult Cochlear Implant Candidacy
    Gifford, Rene H.
    Dorman, Michael F.
    Shallop, Jon K.
    Sydlowski, Sarah A.
    [J]. EAR AND HEARING, 2010, 31 (02) : 186 - 194
  • [8] Clinical implications of a damaged cochlea: Pure tone thresholds vs information-carrying capacity
    Halpin, Chris
    Rauch, Steven D.
    [J]. OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2009, 140 (04) : 473 - 476
  • [9] Factors Affecting Open-Set Word Recognition in Adults With Cochlear Implants
    Holden, Laura K.
    Finley, Charles C.
    Firszt, Jill B.
    Holden, Timothy A.
    Brenner, Christine
    Potts, Lisa G.
    Gotter, Brenda D.
    Vanderhoof, Sallie S.
    Mispagel, Karen
    Heydebrand, Gitry
    Skinner, Margaret W.
    [J]. EAR AND HEARING, 2013, 34 (03) : 342 - 360
  • [10] Speech perception with hearing aids in comparison to pure-tone hearing loss
    Hoppe, U.
    Hast, A.
    Hocke, T.
    [J]. HNO, 2014, 62 (06) : 443 - 448
12