A participatory scenario method to explore the future of marine social-ecological systems

被引:23
|
作者
Planque, Benjamin [1 ]
Mullon, Christian [2 ]
Arneberg, Per [1 ]
Eide, Arne [3 ]
Fromentin, Jean-Marc [2 ,4 ]
Heymans, Johanna Jacomina [5 ,6 ]
Hoel, Alf Hakon [1 ]
Niiranen, Susa [7 ]
Ottersen, Geir [8 ]
Sando, Anne Britt [8 ,9 ]
Sommerkorn, Martin [10 ]
Thebaud, Olivier [11 ]
Thorvik, Thorbjorn [12 ]
机构
[1] Inst Marine Res, Tromso, Norway
[2] Univ Montpellier, CNRS, UMR Marbec, IRD,Ifremer, Sete, France
[3] Arctic Univ Norway, Norwegian Coll Fisheries Sci, Tromso, Norway
[4] Univ Montpellier, CNRS, IFREMER, Sete, France
[5] European Marine Board, Oostende, Belgium
[6] Scottish Marine Inst, SAMS, Oban, Argyll, Scotland
[7] Stockholm Univ, Stockholm Resilience Ctr, Stockholm, Sweden
[8] Inst Marine Res, Bergen, Norway
[9] Inst Marine Res, Bjerknes Ctr, Bergen, Norway
[10] World Wide Fund Nat WWF Arctic Programme, Oslo, Norway
[11] Univ Brest, Ifremer, CNRS, UMR 6308,AMURE,Unite Econ Maritime,IUEM, Plouzane, France
[12] Directorate Fisheries, Bergen, Norway
关键词
Barents Sea; future studies; multiple perspectives; participatory fisheries management; storylines; uncertainty; CLIMATE-CHANGE; FISHERIES MANAGEMENT; SCIENCE; BIODIVERSITY; GOVERNANCE; CHALLENGES; REFORM; TRUST;
D O I
10.1111/faf.12356
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
Anticipating future changes in marine social-ecological systems (MSES) several decades into the future is essential in the context of accelerating global change. This is challenging in situations where actors do not share common understandings, practices, or visions about the future. We introduce a dedicated scenario method for the development of MSES scenarios in a participatory context. The objective is to allow different actors to jointly develop scenarios which contain their multiple visions of the future. The method starts from four perspectives: "fisheries management," "ecosystem," "ocean climate," and "global context and governance" for which current status and recent trends are summarized. Contrasted scenarios about possible futures are elaborated for each of the four single perspectives before being integrated into multiple-perspective scenarios. Selected scenarios are then developed into storylines. Focusing on individual perspectives until near the end allows actors with diverse cultures, interests and horizons to confront their own notions of the future. We illustrate the method with the exploration of the futures of the Barents Sea MSES by 2050. We emphasize the following lessons learned: first, many actors are not familiar with scenario building and attention must be paid to explaining the purpose, methodology, and benefits of scenarios exercises. Second, although the Barents Sea MSES is relatively well understood, uncertainties about its future are significant. Third, it is important to focus on unlikely events. Fourth, all perspectives should be treated equally. Fifth, as MSES are continuously changing, we can only be prepared for future changes if we collectively keep preparing.
引用
收藏
页码:434 / 451
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A systematic review of participatory scenario planning to envision mountain social-ecological systems futures
    Thorn, Jessica P. R.
    Klein, Julia A.
    Steger, Cara
    Hopping, Kelly A.
    Capitani, Claudia
    Tucker, Catherine M.
    Nolin, Anne W.
    Reid, Robin S.
    Seidl, Roman
    Chitale, Vishwas S.
    Marchant, Robert
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2020, 25 (03): : 1 - 55
  • [2] Modeling Social-Ecological Scenarios in Marine Systems
    Osterblom, Henrik
    Merrie, Andrew
    Metian, Marc
    Boonstra, Wiebren J.
    Blenckner, Thorsten
    Watson, James R.
    Rykaczewski, Ryan R.
    Ota, Yoshitaka
    Sarmiento, Jorge L.
    Christensen, Villy
    Schluter, Maja
    Birnbaum, Simon
    Gustafsson, Bo G.
    Humborg, Christoph
    Morth, Carl-Magnus
    Muller-Karulis, Barbel
    Tomczak, Maciej T.
    Troell, Max
    Folke, Carl
    BIOSCIENCE, 2013, 63 (09) : 735 - 744
  • [3] Marine reserves as linked social-ecological systems
    Pollnac, Richard
    Christie, Patrick
    Cinner, Joshua E.
    Dalton, Tracey
    Daw, Tim M.
    Forrester, Graham E.
    Graham, Nicholas A. J.
    McClanahan, Timothy R.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2010, 107 (43) : 18262 - 18265
  • [4] Participatory scenario planning and framing of social-ecological systems: an analysis of policy formulation processes in Rwanda and Tanzania
    Rutting, Lucas
    Vervoort, Joost M.
    Mees, Heleen
    Driessen, Peter P. J.
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2021, 26 (04):
  • [5] Global changes in marine systems: A social-ecological approach
    Perry, R. Ian
    Barange, Manuel
    Ommer, Rosemary E.
    PROGRESS IN OCEANOGRAPHY, 2010, 87 (1-4) : 331 - 337
  • [6] Characterizing fisheries connectivity in marine social-ecological systems
    Fuller, Emma C.
    Samhouri, Jameal F.
    Stoll, Joshua S.
    Levin, Simon A.
    Watson, James R.
    ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE, 2017, 74 (08) : 2087 - 2096
  • [7] Stakeholder engagement in participatory research in French marine and freshwater social-ecological systems: A systematic map protocol
    Chevallier, Adrien
    Balti, Heikel
    Gourguet, Sophie
    Macher, Claire
    Shin, Yunne-Jai
    Moullec, Fabien
    ECOLOGICAL SOLUTIONS AND EVIDENCE, 2024, 5 (01):
  • [8] Trends in marine fisheries social-ecological systems studies
    Restrepo-Gomez, Diana C. J.
    Zetina-Rejon, Manuel A.
    Zepeda-Dominguez, Jose
    OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 220
  • [9] Resilience management in social-ecological systems: a working hypothesis for a participatory approach
    Walker, B
    Carpenter, S
    Anderies, J
    Abel, N
    Cumming, G
    Janssen, M
    Lebel, L
    Norberg, J
    Peterson, GD
    Pritchard, R
    CONSERVATION ECOLOGY, 2002, 6 (01):
  • [10] Evaluating Linked Social-Ecological Systems in Marine Protected Areas
    Lopez-Angarita, Juliana
    Moreno-Sanchez, Rocio
    Higinio Maldonado, Jorge
    Sanchez, Juan A.
    CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2014, 7 (03): : 241 - 252