A Four-Year Longitudinal Comparative Study on the Lexicon Development of Russian and Turkish Heritage Speakers in Germany

被引:9
作者
Czapka, Sophia [1 ]
Topaj, Nathalie [1 ]
Gagarina, Natalia [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Leibniz Ctr Gen Linguist ZAS, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
[2] Humboldt Univ, Inst German Language & Linguist, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
关键词
expressive lexicon; heritage language; Russian; Turkish; predictors of lexicon size; LANGUAGE; ACQUISITION; FRENCH; HOME; L2;
D O I
10.3390/languages6010027
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
Russian and Turkish are the most frequently spoken and intensively investigated heritage languages in Germany, but contrastive research on their development in early childhood is still missing. This longitudinal study compares the trajectories of expressive lexicon development in Russian (n = 70) and Turkish (n = 79) heritage speakers and identifies predictors for their lexicon size at preschool age. Heritage lexicon size was tested with two comparable tests assessing the expressive lexicon at four test points between the mean ages of 3.3 (range: 25-49 months) and 5.6 (range: 54-78 months) years. The influence of language-related factors, such as input quantity, parents' heritage language proficiency and age of onset (AoO) of German, and other potential predictors, i.e., intelligence and socio-economic status, is evaluated. Results show that the Turkish group's abilities grow slower but are similar at the last test point. Common predictors for lexicon size are input quantity from siblings and AoO. Group-specific influences are parental input quantity in the Russian group and siblings' proficiency in the Turkish group. Our findings emphasize the interplay of input quantity and society language AoO for heritage lexicon development. The relevance of our results for the usage-based theory of language acquisition is discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 12
页数:12
相关论文
共 57 条
  • [31] Klassert Annegret., 2011, THESIS PHILIPPS U MA
  • [32] Kupisch T., 2020, STUDIES BLINGUALISM, P207
  • [33] Acquisition outcomes across domains in adult simultaneous bilinguals with French as weaker and stronger language
    Kupisch, Tanja
    Lein, Tatjana
    Barton, Dagmar
    Schroeder, Dawn Judith
    Stangen, Ilse
    Stoehr, Antje
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FRENCH LANGUAGE STUDIES, 2014, 24 (03) : 347 - 376
  • [34] Leseman P., 2000, J MULTHINGUAL MULTIC, V21, P93, DOI DOI 10.1080/01434630008666396
  • [35] Lieven Elena, 2008, Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition, P168
  • [36] Macrostructure components in narrations of Turkish-German bilingual children
    Mavis, Ilknur
    Tuncer, Muege
    Gagarina, Natalia
    [J]. APPLIED PSYCHOLINGUISTICS, 2016, 37 (01) : 69 - 89
  • [37] OLFERT HELENA, 2018, Handbook of research and practice in heritage language education, P397, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-38893-9_25-2, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-44694-3_25]
  • [38] Profile effects in early bilingual language and literacy
    Oller, D. Kimbrough
    Pearson, Barbara Z.
    Cobo-Lewis, Alan B.
    [J]. APPLIED PSYCHOLINGUISTICS, 2007, 28 (02) : 191 - 230
  • [39] Oztekin Buket., 2019, THESIS UPPSALA U UPP
  • [40] Individual differences in child English second language acquisition Comparing child-internal and child-external factors
    Paradis, Johanne
    [J]. LINGUISTIC APPROACHES TO BILINGUALISM, 2011, 1 (03) : 213 - 237