Prognostic grade for resecting hepatocellular carcinoma: multicentre retrospective study

被引:3
作者
Takayama, T. [1 ]
Yamazaki, S. [1 ]
Matsuyama, Y. [2 ]
Midorikawa, Y. [1 ]
Shiina, S. [3 ]
Izumi, N. [4 ]
Hasegawa, K. [5 ]
Kokudo, N. [6 ]
Sakamoto, M. [7 ]
Kubo, S. [8 ]
Kudo, M. [9 ]
Murakami, T. [10 ]
Nakashima, O. [11 ]
机构
[1] Nihon Univ, Dept Digest Surg, Sch Med, Tokyo, Japan
[2] Univ Tokyo, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Juntendo Univ, Dept Gastroenterol, Sch Med, Tokyo, Japan
[4] Musashino Red Cross Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Tokyo, Japan
[5] Univ Tokyo, Sch Med, Dept Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg, Tokyo, Japan
[6] Natl Ctr Global Hlth & Med, Dept Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg, Tokyo, Japan
[7] Keio Univ, Dept Pathol, Sch Med, Tokyo, Japan
[8] Osaka City Univ, Dept Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg, Grad Sch Med, Osaka, Japan
[9] Kinki Univ, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Sch Med, Osaka, Japan
[10] Kobe Univ, Dept Radiol, Grad Sch Med, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
[11] Kurume Univ Hosp, Dept Clin Lab Med, Kurume, Fukuoka, Japan
关键词
SURVIVAL BENEFIT; LIVER RESECTION; SURGERY; REMOVAL;
D O I
10.1093/bjs/znaa109
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Surgical treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is advancing, but a robust prediction model for survival after resection is not available. The aim of this study was to propose a prognostic grading system for resection of HCC. Methods: This was a retrospective, multicentre study of patients who underwent first resection of HCC with curative intent between 2000 and 2007. Patients were divided randomly by a cross-validation method into training and validation sets. Prognostic factors were identified using a Cox proportional hazards model. The predictive model was built by decision-tree analysis to define the resection grades, and subsequently validated. Results: A total of 16 931 patients from 795 hospitals were included. In the training set (8465 patients), four surgical grades were classified based on prognosis: grade A1 (1236 patients, 14.6 per cent; single tumour 3 cm or smaller and anatomical R0 resection); grade A2 (3614, 42.7 per cent; single tumour larger than 3 cm, or non-anatomical R0 resection); grade B (2277, 26.9 per cent; multiple tumours, or vascular invasion, and R0 resection); and grade C (1338, 15.8 per cent; multiple tumours with vascular invasion and R0 resection, or R1 resection). Five-year survival rates were 73.9 per cent (hazard ratio (HR) 1.00), 64.7 per cent (HR 1.51, 95 per cent c.i. 1.29 to 1.78), 50.6 per cent (HR 2.53, 2.15 to 2.98), and 34.8 per cent (HR 4.60, 3.90 to 5.42) for grades A1, A2, B, and C respectively. In the validation set (8466 patients), the grades had equivalent reproducibility for both overall and recurrence-free survival (all P<0.001). Conclusion: This grade is used to predict prognosis of patients undergoing resection of HCC.
引用
收藏
页码:412 / 418
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Significance of the surgical hepatic resection margin in patients with a single hepatocellular carcinoma
    Aoki, T.
    Kubota, K.
    Hasegawa, K.
    Kubo, S.
    Izumi, N.
    Kokudo, N.
    Sakamoto, M.
    Shiina, S.
    Takayama, T.
    Nakashima, O.
    Matsuyama, Y.
    Murakami, T.
    Kudo, M.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 107 (01) : 113 - +
  • [2] Global trends and predictions in hepatocellular carcinoma mortality
    Bertuccio, Paola
    Turati, Federica
    Carioli, Greta
    Rodriguez, Teresa
    La Vecchia, Carlo
    Malvezzi, Matteo
    Negri, Eva
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2017, 67 (02) : 302 - 309
  • [3] Evidence-Based Diagnosis, Staging, and Treatment of Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Bruix, Jordi
    Reig, Maria
    Sherman, Morris
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 150 (04) : 835 - 853
  • [4] Staging and Prognostic Models for Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
    Burkhart, Richard A.
    Pawlik, Timothy M.
    [J]. CANCER CONTROL, 2017, 24 (03)
  • [5] Medical progress: Strategies for safer liver surgery and partial liver transplantation
    Clavien, Pierre-Alain
    Petrowsky, Henrik
    DeOliveira, Michelle L.
    Graf, Rolf
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 356 (15) : 1545 - 1559
  • [6] A Comprehensive Meta-regression Analysis on Outcome of Anatomic Resection Versus Nonanatomic Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Cucchetti, Alessandro
    Cescon, Matteo
    Ercolani, Giorgio
    Bigonzi, Eleonora
    Torzilli, Guido
    Pinna, Antonio D.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 19 (12) : 3697 - 3705
  • [7] Comparison of the outcomes between an anatomical subsegmentectomy and a non-anatomical minor hepatectomy for single hepatocellular carcinomas based on a Japanese nationwide survey
    Eguchi, Susumu
    Kanematsu, Takashi
    Arii, Shigeki
    Okazaki, Masatoshi
    Okita, Kiwarnu
    Omata, Masao
    Ikai, Iwao
    Kudo, Masatoshi
    Kojiro, Masamichi
    Makuuchi, Masatoshi
    Monden, Morito
    Matsuyama, Yutaka
    Nakanuma, Yasuni
    Takayasu, Kenichi
    [J]. SURGERY, 2008, 143 (04) : 469 - 475
  • [8] Prognostic and Therapeutic Implications of Microvascular Invasion in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Erstad, Derek J.
    Tanabe, Kenneth K.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 26 (05) : 1474 - 1493
  • [9] European Assoc Study Liver, 2018, J HEPATOL, V69, P182, DOI 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.03.019
  • [10] Liver Resection for Multiple Hepatocellular Carcinomas A Japanese Nationwide Survey
    Fukami, Yasuyuki
    Kaneoka, Yuji
    Maeda, Atsuyuki
    Kumada, Takashi
    Tanaka, Junko
    Akita, Tomoyuki
    Kubo, Shoji
    Izumi, Namiki
    Kadoya, Masumi
    Sakamoto, Michiie
    Nakashima, Osamu
    Matsuyama, Yutaka
    Kokudo, Takashi
    Hasegawa, Kiyoshi
    Yamashita, Tatsuya
    Kashiwabara, Kosuke
    Takayama, Tadatoshi
    Kokudo, Norihiro
    Kudo, Masatoshi
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2020, 272 (01) : 145 - 154