Patterns of Use and Risks Associated With Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents Among Medicare Patients With Cancer

被引:58
|
作者
Hershman, Dawn L. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Buono, Donna L. [3 ,4 ]
Malin, Jennifer [5 ,6 ]
McBride, Russell [3 ,4 ]
Tsai, Wei Yann [3 ,4 ]
Neugut, Alfred I. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Med Ctr, Coll Phys & Surg, Dept Med, New York, NY 10032 USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Herbert Irving Comprehens Canc Ctr, Coll Phys & Surg, New York, NY 10032 USA
[3] Columbia Univ, Mailman Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, New York, NY 10032 USA
[4] Columbia Univ, Mailman Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, New York, NY 10032 USA
[5] New York Presbyterian Hosp, New York, NY USA
[6] Greater Angeles VA Healthcare Syst, Los Angeles, CA USA
来源
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE | 2009年 / 101卷 / 23期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
RECOMBINANT-HUMAN-ERYTHROPOIETIN; DOUBLE-BLIND; DRUG-SAFETY; BREAST-CANCER; EPOETIN-ALPHA; LUNG-CANCER; RADIATION; THERAPY; CHEMOTHERAPY; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1093/jnci/djp387
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (erythropoietin and darbepoietin) have been approved to reduce the number of blood transfusions required during chemotherapy; however, concerns about the risks of venous thromboembolism and mortality exist. We identified patients who were aged 65 years or older in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database; who were diagnosed with colon, non-small cell lung, or breast cancer or with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma from January 1, 1991, through December 31, 2002; and who received chemotherapy. The main outcome measures were claims for use of an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent, blood transfusion, venous thromboembolism (ie, deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism), and overall survival. We used multivariable logistic regression models to analyze the association of erythropoiesis-stimulating agent use with clinical and demographic variables. We used time-dependent Cox proportional hazards models to analyze the association of time to receipt of first erythropoiesis-stimulating agent with venous thromboembolism and overall survival. All statistical tests were two-sided. Among 56 210 patients treated with chemotherapy from 1991 through 2002, 15 346 (27%) received an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent. The proportion of patients receiving erythropoiesis-stimulating agents increased from 4.8% in 1991 to 45.9% in 2002 (P < .001). Use was associated with more recent diagnosis, younger age, urban residence, comorbidities, receipt of radiation therapy, female sex, and metastatic or recurrent cancer. The rate of blood transfusion per year during 1991-2002 remained constant at 22%. Venous thromboembolism developed in 1796 (14.3%) of the 12 522 patients who received erythropoiesis-stimulating agent and 3400 (9.8%) of the 34 820 patients who did not (hazard ratio = 1.93, 95% confidence interval = 1.79 to 2.07). Overall survival was similar in both groups. Use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agent increased rapidly after its approval in 1991, but the blood transfusion rate did not change. Use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents was associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism but not of mortality.
引用
收藏
页码:1633 / 1641
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Association of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents and the incidence risk of cancer diagnosis among chronic dialysis patients: a nested case-control study
    Rene, Emilie
    Lazrak, Hind H.
    Laurin, Louis-Philippe
    Elftouh, Naoual
    Vallee, Michel
    Lafrance, Jean-Philippe
    NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2017, 32 (06) : 1047 - 1052
  • [22] Effects of erythropoietin receptors and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents on disease progression in cancer
    Aapro, M.
    Jelkmann, W.
    Constantinescu, S. N.
    Leyland-Jones, B.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2012, 106 (07) : 1249 - 1258
  • [23] Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents are not associated with increased risk of thrombosis in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes
    Smith, Sheila Weiss
    Sato, Masayo
    Gore, Steven D.
    Baer, Maria R.
    Ke, Xuehua
    McNally, Diane
    Davidoff, Amy
    HAEMATOLOGICA-THE HEMATOLOGY JOURNAL, 2012, 97 (01): : 15 - 20
  • [24] Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in the management of cancer patients with anemia: a meta-analysis
    Li, Xiaomei
    Yan, Zhi
    Kong, Dexiao
    Zou, Wen
    Wang, Jihua
    Sun, Dianshui
    Jiang, Yuhua
    Zheng, Chengyun
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH, 2014, 26 (03) : 268 - 276
  • [25] Thrombotic Complications of Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents
    Lippi, Giuseppe
    Franchini, Massimo
    Favaloro, Emmanuel J.
    SEMINARS IN THROMBOSIS AND HEMOSTASIS, 2010, 36 (05) : 537 - 549
  • [26] Outcomes of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in cancer patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia
    Pashos, Chris L.
    Larholt, Kay
    Fraser, Kimberly A.
    McKenzie, R. Scott
    Senbetta, Mekre
    Piech, Catherine Tak
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2012, 20 (01) : 159 - 165
  • [27] Pharmacovigilance in practice: erythropoiesis-stimulating agents
    Hedenus, Michael
    Ludwig, Heinz
    Henry, David H.
    Gasal, Eduard
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2014, 3 (05): : 1416 - 1429
  • [28] Effect of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents on breast cancer patients: a meta-analysis
    Tong Wu
    Zhenhua Tong
    Tianshu Ren
    Danni Xie
    Xue Sun
    Clinical and Experimental Medicine, 2023, 23 : 1501 - 1513
  • [29] Treatment of Chemotherapy-Induced Anemia in Ovarian Cancer Patients Does the Use of Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents Worsen Survival?
    Rocconi, Rodney P.
    Sullivan, Paula
    Long, Beverly
    Maize, Marie
    Brown, Jennifer
    Arbuckle, Janeen
    Bevis, Kerri
    Estes, Jacob M.
    Reed, Eddie
    Finan, Michael A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2012, 22 (05) : 786 - 791
  • [30] Safety and efficacy outcomes with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in patients with breast cancer: a meta-analysis
    Aapro, M.
    Moebus, V.
    Nitz, U.
    O'Shaughnessy, J.
    Pronzato, P.
    Untch, M.
    Tomita, D.
    Bohac, C.
    Leyland-Jones, B.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2015, 26 (04) : 688 - 695