Clinical validation of a novel automated cell-free DNA screening assay for trisomies 21, 13, and 18 in maternal plasma

被引:20
作者
Ericsson, Olle [1 ]
Ahola, Tarja [1 ]
Dahl, Fredrik [1 ]
Karlsson, Filip [1 ]
Persson, Fredrik [1 ]
Karlberg, Olof [1 ]
Roos, Fredrik [1 ]
Alftren, Ida [1 ]
Andersson, Bjorn [1 ]
Barkenas, Emelie [1 ]
Boghos, Ani [1 ]
Brandner, Birgit [1 ]
Dahlberg, Jenny [1 ]
Forsgren, Per-Ola [1 ]
Francois, Niels [1 ]
Gousseva, Anna [1 ]
Hakamali, Faizan [1 ]
Janfalk-Carlsson, Asa [1 ]
Johansson, Henrik [1 ]
Lundgren, Johanna [1 ]
Mohsenchian, Atefeh [1 ]
Olausson, Linus [1 ]
Olofsson, Simon [1 ]
Qureshi, Atif [1 ]
Skarpas, Bjorn [1 ]
Svahn, Peter [1 ]
Savneby, Anna [1 ,2 ]
Astrom, Eva [1 ]
Sahlberg, Anna [2 ]
Fianu-Jonasson, Aino [3 ]
Gautier, Jeremie [4 ]
Costa, Jean-Marc [5 ]
Jacobsson, Bo [6 ,7 ,8 ]
Nicolaides, Kypros [9 ]
机构
[1] PerkinElmer, Vanadis Diagnost, S-19138 Sollentuna, Sweden
[2] PerkinElmer, Wallac Oy, Turku, Finland
[3] Karolinska Inst, Div Obstet & Gynecolocy, Dept Clin Sci Huddinge, Solna, Sweden
[4] Cerba Healthcare, Cerba Xpert, St Quen Laumone, France
[5] Lab Cerba, Pole Genet Humaine, St Quen Laumone, France
[6] Univ Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Acad, Inst Clin Sci, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Gothenburg, Sweden
[7] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Gothenburg, Sweden
[8] Inst Publ Hlth, Domain Hlth Data & Digitalizat, Dept Genet & Bioinformat, Oslo, Norway
[9] Kings Coll Hosp London, Harris Birthright Res Ctr Fetal Med, London, England
关键词
PRENATAL DETECTION; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; DOWN-SYNDROME; PERFORMANCE; BLOOD;
D O I
10.1002/pd.5528
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Objective To evaluate clinical performance of a new automated cell-free (cf)DNA assay in maternal plasma screening for trisomies 21, 18, and 13, and to determine fetal sex. Method Maternal plasma samples from 1200 singleton pregnancies were analyzed with a new non-sequencing cfDNA method, which is based on imaging and counting specific chromosome targets. Reference outcomes were determined by either cytogenetic testing, of amniotic fluid or chorionic villi, or clinical examination of neonates. Results The samples examined included 158 fetal aneuploidies. Sensitivity was 100% (112/112) for trisomy 21, 89% (32/36) for trisomy 18, and 100% (10/10) for trisomy 13. The respective specificities were 100%, 99.5%, and 99.9%. There were five first pass failures (0.4%), all in unaffected pregnancies. Sex classification was performed on 979 of the samples and 99.6% (975/979) provided a concordant result. Conclusion The new automated cfDNA assay has high sensitivity and specificity for trisomies 21, 18, and 13 and accurate classification of fetal sex, while maintaining a low failure rate. The study demonstrated that cfDNA testing can be simplified and automated to reduce cost and thereby enabling wider population-based screening.
引用
收藏
页码:1011 / 1015
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Relative quantitation of cell-free fetal DNA in maternal plasma using autosomal DNA markers
    Davanos, Nikolaos
    Spathas, Dionysios Haralampos
    CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2011, 412 (17-18) : 1539 - 1543
  • [32] Cell-free DNA testing of maternal blood in screening for trisomies in twin pregnancy: updated cohort study at 10-14 weeks and meta-analysis
    Judah, H.
    Gil, M. M.
    Syngelaki, A.
    Galeva, S.
    Jani, J.
    Akolekar, R.
    Nicolaides, K. H.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 58 (02) : 178 - 189
  • [33] Analysis of Cell-Free DNA in Maternal Blood in Screening for Aneuploidies: Meta-Analysis
    Gil, M. M.
    Akolekar, R.
    Quezada, M. S.
    Bregant, B.
    Nicolaides, K. H.
    FETAL DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPY, 2014, 35 (03) : 156 - 173
  • [34] Performance of screening for aneuploidies by cell-free DNA analysis of maternal blood in twin pregnancies
    Bevilacqua, E.
    Gil, M. M.
    Nicolaides, K. H.
    Ordonez, E.
    Cirigliano, V.
    Dierickx, H.
    Willems, P. J.
    Jani, J. C.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 45 (01) : 61 - 66
  • [35] Cell-free fetal DNA versus maternal serum screening for trisomy 21 in pregnant women with and without assisted reproduction technology: a prospective interventional study
    Costa, Jean-Marc
    Letourneau, Alexandra
    Favre, Romain
    Bidat, Laurent
    Belaisch-Allart, Joelle
    Jouannic, Jean-Marie
    Quarello, Edwin
    Senat, Marie-Victoire
    Broussin, Bernard
    Tsatsaris, Vassilis
    Demain, Adele
    Kleinfinger, Pascale
    Lohmann, Laurence
    Agostini, Helene
    Bouyer, Jean
    Benachi, Alexandra
    GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2018, 20 (11) : 1346 - 1353
  • [36] An Advanced Model to Precisely Estimate the Cell-Free Fetal DNA Concentration in Maternal Plasma
    Kang, Xiongbin
    Xia, Jun
    Wang, Yicong
    Xu, Huixin
    Jiang, Haojun
    Xie, Weiwei
    Chen, Fang
    Zeng, Peng
    Li, Xuchao
    Xie, Yifan
    Liu, Hongtai
    Huang, Guodong
    Chen, Dayang
    Liu, Ping
    Jiang, Hui
    Zhang, Xiuqing
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (09):
  • [37] Role of cell-free fetal DNA in the maternal plasma in the prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities
    Lu, Rong
    Xu, Hui
    Chen, Xin
    Wang, Yuanlin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2016, 9 (06): : 11740 - 11747
  • [38] Noninvasive prenatal detection and selective analysis of cell-free DNA obtained from maternal blood: evaluation for trisomy 21 and trisomy 18
    Sparks, Andrew B.
    Struble, Craig A.
    Wang, Eric T.
    Song, Ken
    Oliphant, Arnold
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 206 (04) : 319.e1 - 319.e9
  • [39] Plasma cell-free DNA in canine lymphoma patients as a novel material for genotyping
    Kambayashi, Satoshi
    Ono, Nanae
    Tone, Tomofumi
    Baba, Kenji
    Okuda, Masaru
    VETERINARY AND COMPARATIVE ONCOLOGY, 2024, 22 (02) : 303 - 309
  • [40] Clinical implementation of routine screening for fetal trisomies in the UK NHS: cell-free DNA test contingent on results from first-trimester combined test
    Gil, M. M.
    Revello, R.
    Poon, L. C.
    Akolekar, R.
    Nicolaides, K. H.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 47 (01) : 45 - 52