IS SELECTIVE DIGESTIVE DECONTAMINATION USEFUL FOR CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS?

被引:5
作者
Cavalcanti, Alexandre Biasi [1 ]
Lisboa, Thiago [4 ]
Gales, Ana Cristina [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Coracao, Res Inst HCor, Rua Abilio Soares 250,12th Floor, BR-04005000 Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Complexo Hosp Santa Casa, Inst Network Res & Inovat Intens Care RIPIMI, Porto Alegre Crit Care Dept, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[3] Clin Hosp, Infect Control Comm, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[4] Sao Paulo Fed Univ, Escola Paulista Med, Dept Internal Med, Div Infect Dis, Sao Paulo, Brazil
来源
SHOCK | 2017年 / 47卷 / 01期
关键词
Antimicrobial-resistant microorganism; critical care; mortality; selective digestive decontamination; INTENSIVE-CARE-UNIT; MULTIPLE-TRAUMA PATIENTS; CONTROLLED-TRIAL; ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE; ANTIBIOTIC-RESISTANCE; TRACT DECONTAMINATION; KLEBSIELLA-PNEUMONIAE; DOUBLE-BLIND; INFECTION; COLONIZATION;
D O I
10.1097/SHK.0000000000000711
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
In this study we review the rationale for using selective digestive decontamination (SDD) in critically ill patients, and its effects on clinical outcomes and rates of infection with antimicrobial-resistant microorganisms. SDD consists of the application of nonabsorbable antibiotics to the oropharynx and through a nasogastric or nasoenteral tube, in association with a 4-day course of an intravenous third-generation cephalosporin. The enteral component aims at preventing oral and rectal colonization with potentially pathogenic nosocomial aerobic gram-negative bacilli and yeasts while preserving normal protective anaerobic enteral flora. The short-course systemic component aims at eradicating oral endogenous grampositive bacteria. SDD decreases the risk of nosocomial infections, and reduces by one-quarter the mortality of patients on mechanical ventilation in settings with low prevalence of antibiotic resistance. Evidence from randomized trials suggests that SDD does not increase rates of antimicrobial-resistant microorganisms, and may reduce resistance rates to some antibiotics. However, several limitations decrease our confidence on these data, particularly for settings with high baseline rates of antimicrobial-resistant microorganisms. Although SDD has a clear potential to improve clinical outcomes of critically patients, its long-term ecologic effects on rates of antimicrobial resistant require appropriate assessment by large multinational cluster randomized trials. Before these results are available, the use of SDD cannot be recommended in most parts of the world, except in settings with very low baseline prevalence of antibiotic resistance.
引用
收藏
页码:52 / 57
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Clinical stakeholders’ opinions on the use of selective decontamination of the digestive tract in critically ill patients in intensive care units: an international Delphi study
    Brian H Cuthbertson
    Marion K Campbell
    Graeme MacLennan
    Eilidh M Duncan
    Andrea P Marshall
    Elisabeth C Wells
    Maria E Prior
    Laura Todd
    Louise Rose
    Ian M Seppelt
    Geoff Bellingan
    Jill J Francis
    Critical Care, 17
  • [32] What is new in selective decontamination of the digestive tract?
    Kesecioglu, Jozef
    Eggimann, Philippe
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2016, 42 (08) : 1270 - 1275
  • [33] Clinical stakeholders' opinions on the use of selective decontamination of the digestive tract in critically ill patients in intensive care units: an international Delphi study
    Cuthbertson, Brian H.
    Campbell, Marion K.
    MacLennan, Graeme
    Duncan, Eilidh M.
    Marshall, Andrea P.
    Wells, Elisabeth C.
    Prior, Maria E.
    Todd, Laura
    Rose, Louise
    Seppelt, Ian M.
    Bellingan, Geoff
    Francis, Jill J.
    CRITICAL CARE, 2013, 17 (06):
  • [34] Reply to "Selective Digestive Tract Decontamination and Spread of Colistin Resistance: Antibiotic Prophylaxis Is Not a Substitute for Hygiene"
    Halaby, Teysir
    al Naiemi, Nashwan
    Vandenbroucke-Grauls, Christina M. J. E.
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2014, 58 (06) : 3576 - 3578
  • [35] Selective digestive and oropharyngeal decontamination in medical and surgical ICU patients: authors' reply
    Plantinga, N. L.
    Bonten, M. J. M.
    CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2018, 24 (05) : 552 - +
  • [36] Selective decontamination of the digestive tract: the mechanism of action is control of gut overgrowth
    Silvestri, Luciano
    de la Cal, Miguel A.
    van Saene, Hendrick K. F.
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2012, 38 (11) : 1738 - 1750
  • [37] Selective decontamination of the digestive tract: Repercussions on microbiology laboratory workload and costs, and antibiotic resistance trends
    Garcia-San Vicente, Blanca
    Canut, Andres
    Labora, Alicia
    Otazua, Maritxu
    Corral, Esther
    ENFERMEDADES INFECCIOSAS Y MICROBIOLOGIA CLINICA, 2010, 28 (02): : 75 - 81
  • [38] Selective decontamination of the digestive tract reduces bacterial bloodstream infection and mortality in critically ill patients. Systematic review of randomized, controlled trials
    Silvestri, L.
    van Saene, H. K. F.
    Milanese, M.
    Gregori, D.
    Gullo, A.
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 2007, 65 (03) : 187 - 203
  • [39] Nebulised amphotericin B to eradicate Candida colonisation from the respiratory tract in critically ill patients receiving selective digestive decontamination: a cohort study
    David SY Ong
    Peter MC Klein Klouwenberg
    Cristian Spitoni
    Marc JM Bonten
    Olaf L Cremer
    Critical Care, 17
  • [40] SELECTIVE DIGESTIVE DECONTAMINATION IN MULTIPLE TRAUMA PATIENTS - COST AND EFFICACY
    LANGLOISKARAGA, A
    BUESCHARBIT, M
    DAVIGNON, A
    ALBANESE, J
    DURBEC, O
    MARTIN, C
    MORATI, N
    BALANSARD, G
    PHARMACY WORLD & SCIENCE, 1995, 17 (01): : 12 - 16