What makes rubrics effective in teacher-feedback? Transparency of learning goals is not enough

被引:59
作者
Wollenschlaeger, Mareike [1 ,4 ]
Hattie, John [2 ]
Machts, Nils [3 ]
Moeller, Jens [3 ]
Harms, Ute [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kiel, IPN Leibniz Inst Sci & Math Educ, Olshausenstr 62, D-24118 Kiel, Germany
[2] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Educ Res Inst, 100 Leicester St, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
[3] Univ Kiel, Dept Psychol, Olshaussenstr 40, D-24118 Kiel, Germany
[4] Rottenburger Str 15-1, D-72070 Tubingen, Germany
关键词
Feedback; Rubric; Performance; Calibration accuracy; REFERENCED SELF-ASSESSMENT; CALIBRATION ACCURACY; FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT; WORKED EXAMPLES; ACHIEVEMENT; EFFICACY; PERFORMANCE; MOTIVATION; JUDGMENTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.11.003
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
This study aimed at identifying the determining factor in making teacher-given rubric feedback effective on student performance (planning experiments in science class), motivation, and calibration accuracy. In a pre post experimental design, secondary school students (N = 120) were randomly assigned to three different variations of rubric feedback incrementally graded with respect to the quantity of included feedback information: in condition 1, the rubric was handed out to the students to make learning goals transparent (transparency information). In condition 2, the rubric as well as information on the students' actual task performance was provided (individual performance information). Condition 3 included not only the rubric and actual task performance information but also individual cues on how to proceed (individual performance improvement information). Students who received improvement information showed a significantly better performance in planning scientific experiments, perceived themselves as being more competent, and were also more accurate in their self-evaluative performance judgments. This calibration accuracy could be identified to be a partial mediator of the positive effect of rubric feedback on performance. Thus, results indicate that the crucial variable in making teachers rubric feedback effective appears to be the successful use of performance improvement information. Implications for educational research and practice are discussed. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 11
页数:11
相关论文
共 82 条
  • [1] Allen Deborah, 2006, CBE Life Sci Educ, V5, P197, DOI 10.1187/cbe.06-06-0168
  • [2] Rubric-referenced self-assessment and middle school students' writing
    Andrade, Heidi L.
    Du, Ying
    Mycek, Kristina
    [J]. ASSESSMENT IN EDUCATION-PRINCIPLES POLICY & PRACTICE, 2010, 17 (02) : 199 - 214
  • [3] Rubric-Referenced Self-Assessment and Self-Efficacy for Writing
    Andrade, Heidi L.
    Wang, Xiaolei
    Du, Ying
    Akawi, Robin L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2009, 102 (04) : 287 - 301
  • [4] Role of rubric-referenced self-assessment in learning to write
    Andrade, HG
    Boulay, BA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2003, 97 (01) : 21 - 34
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2000, KFT 4 12 R KOGNITIVE, DOI DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0984(199612)10:5%E2%89%A4303::AID-PER262%3E3.0.CO
  • [6] 2-2
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2004, HDB RES ED COMMUNICA, DOI DOI 10.1007/S00127-009-0052-2
  • [8] [Anonymous], 103 YB NATL SOC STUD
  • [9] [Anonymous], LEARNING INSTRUCTION
  • [10] [Anonymous], MAKING IT TANGIBLE L