Effect of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography on the decision-making of radiation oncologists

被引:72
|
作者
Shakespeare, Thomas P. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] North Coast Canc Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol, Coffs Harbour, NSW 2450, Australia
[2] Univ New S Wales, Rural Clin Sch, Fac Med, Coffs Harbour, NSW 2450, Australia
来源
RADIATION ONCOLOGY | 2015年 / 10卷
关键词
Prostate cancer; Radiotherapy; Prostate-specific membrane antigen; Positron emission tomography; Decision-making; Staging; Radiation oncologist; BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE; CANCER; PET/CT;
D O I
10.1186/s13014-015-0548-8
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging is routinely used in many cancer types, although is not yet a standard modality for prostate carcinoma. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET is a promising new modality for staging prostate cancer, with recent studies showing potential advantages over traditional computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and nuclear medicine bone scan imaging. However, the impact of PSMA PET on the decision-making of radiation oncologists and outcomes after radiotherapy is yet to be determined. Our aim was to determine the impact of PSMA PET on a radiation oncologist's clinical practice. Findings: Patients in a radiation oncology clinic who underwent PSMA PET were prospectively recorded in an electronic oncology record. Patient demographics, outcomes of imaging, and impact on decision-making were evaluated. Fifty-four patients underwent PSMA PET between January and May 2015. The major reasons for undergoing PET included staging before definitive (14.8 %) or post-prostatectomy (33.3 %) radiotherapy, and investigation of PSA failures following definitive (16.7 %) or post-prostatectomy (33.3 %) radiotherapy. In 46.3 % of patients PSMA was positive after negative traditional imaging, in 9.3 % PSMA was positive after equivocal imaging, and in 13.0 % PSMA was negative after equivocal imaging. PSMA PET changed radiotherapy management in 46.3 % of cases, and hormone therapy in 33.3 % of patients, with an overall change in decision-making in 53.7 % of patients. Conclusions: PSMA PET has the potential to significantly alter the decision-making of radiation oncologists, and may become a valuable imaging tool in the future.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA PET) for urologists-when and which tracer?
    Berliner, Christoph
    Kesch, Claudia
    Fendler, Wolfgang P.
    Eiber, Matthias
    Maurer, Tobias
    UROLOGE, 2022, 61 (04): : 384 - 391
  • [42] 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen-positron emission tomography/computed tomography in advanced prostate cancer: Current state and future trends
    Udovicich, Cristian
    Perera, Marlon
    Hofman, Michael S.
    Siva, Shankar
    Del Rio, Andres
    Murphy, Declan G.
    Lawrentschuk, Nathan
    PROSTATE INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 5 (04) : 125 - 129
  • [43] PEARLS: Is Our Use of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography Meaningful for Our Patients?
    Murray, J. R.
    Sankey, P.
    Tree, A. C.
    Hall, E.
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 34 (09) : 589 - 592
  • [44] Prostate-specific membrane antigen-positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) of prostate cancer: current and emerging applications
    Shamus Moran
    Heather H. Cheng
    Emily Weg
    Eric H. Kim
    Delphine L. Chen
    Amir Iravani
    Joseph E. Ippolito
    Abdominal Radiology, 2024, 49 : 1288 - 1305
  • [45] New frontiers in prostate cancer imaging: clinical utility of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography
    Asim Afaq
    Deepak Batura
    Jamshed Bomanji
    International Urology and Nephrology, 2017, 49 : 803 - 810
  • [46] Heterogeneous Flare in Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography Tracer Uptake with Initiation of Androgen Pathway Blockade in Metastatic Prostate Cancer
    Aggarwal, Rahul
    Wei, Xiao
    Kim, Won
    Small, Eric J.
    Ryan, Charles J.
    Carroll, Peter
    Cooperberg, Matthew
    Evans, Michael J.
    Hope, Thomas
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2018, 1 (01): : 78 - 82
  • [47] Prostate-specific membrane antigen-positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) of prostate cancer: current and emerging applications
    Moran, Shamus
    Cheng, Heather H.
    Weg, Emily
    Kim, Eric H.
    Chen, Delphine L.
    Iravani, Amir
    Ippolito, Joseph E.
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2024, 49 (04) : 1288 - 1305
  • [48] New frontiers in prostate cancer imaging: clinical utility of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography
    Afaq, Asim
    Batura, Deepak
    Bomanji, Jamshed
    INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2017, 49 (05) : 803 - 810
  • [49] Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography-Derived Radiomic Models in Prostate Cancer Prognostication
    Huynh, Linda My
    Swanson, Shea
    Cima, Sophia
    Haddadin, Eliana
    Baine, Michael
    CANCERS, 2024, 16 (10)
  • [50] Positron Emission Tomography-computed Tomography with Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Ligands as a Promising Tool for Imaging of Prostate Cancer
    Haberkorn, Uwe
    Kopka, Klaus
    Hadaschik, Boris
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 69 (03) : 397 - 399