Effect of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography on the decision-making of radiation oncologists

被引:72
|
作者
Shakespeare, Thomas P. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] North Coast Canc Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol, Coffs Harbour, NSW 2450, Australia
[2] Univ New S Wales, Rural Clin Sch, Fac Med, Coffs Harbour, NSW 2450, Australia
来源
RADIATION ONCOLOGY | 2015年 / 10卷
关键词
Prostate cancer; Radiotherapy; Prostate-specific membrane antigen; Positron emission tomography; Decision-making; Staging; Radiation oncologist; BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE; CANCER; PET/CT;
D O I
10.1186/s13014-015-0548-8
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging is routinely used in many cancer types, although is not yet a standard modality for prostate carcinoma. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET is a promising new modality for staging prostate cancer, with recent studies showing potential advantages over traditional computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and nuclear medicine bone scan imaging. However, the impact of PSMA PET on the decision-making of radiation oncologists and outcomes after radiotherapy is yet to be determined. Our aim was to determine the impact of PSMA PET on a radiation oncologist's clinical practice. Findings: Patients in a radiation oncology clinic who underwent PSMA PET were prospectively recorded in an electronic oncology record. Patient demographics, outcomes of imaging, and impact on decision-making were evaluated. Fifty-four patients underwent PSMA PET between January and May 2015. The major reasons for undergoing PET included staging before definitive (14.8 %) or post-prostatectomy (33.3 %) radiotherapy, and investigation of PSA failures following definitive (16.7 %) or post-prostatectomy (33.3 %) radiotherapy. In 46.3 % of patients PSMA was positive after negative traditional imaging, in 9.3 % PSMA was positive after equivocal imaging, and in 13.0 % PSMA was negative after equivocal imaging. PSMA PET changed radiotherapy management in 46.3 % of cases, and hormone therapy in 33.3 % of patients, with an overall change in decision-making in 53.7 % of patients. Conclusions: PSMA PET has the potential to significantly alter the decision-making of radiation oncologists, and may become a valuable imaging tool in the future.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography compared with diagnostic computed tomography in relapsed prostate cancer
    Asokendaran, Marcus Edward
    Meyrick, Danielle P.
    Skelly, Laura A.
    Lenzo, Nat P.
    Henderson, Andrew
    WORLD JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2019, 18 (03) : 232 - 237
  • [22] Diagnostic performance of Gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography-computed tomography in intermediate and high risk prostate cancer
    El Hajj, Albert
    Yacoub, Basel
    Mansour, Mazen
    Khauli, Raja
    Bulbul, Mohamad
    Nassif, Samer
    Haidar, Mohamad B.
    MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (44) : e17491
  • [23] The Role of Radiolabeled Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for the Evaluation of Renal Cancer
    Evangelista, Laura
    Basso, Umberto
    Maruzzo, Marco
    Novara, Giacomo
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2020, 6 (01): : 146 - 150
  • [24] 68Ga-Labeled Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Ligand Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    von Eyben, Finn E.
    Picchio, Maria
    von Eyben, Rie
    Rhee, Handoo
    Bauman, Glenn
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2018, 4 (05): : 686 - 693
  • [25] Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Is Associated with Improved Oncological Outcome in Men Treated with Salvage Radiation Therapy for Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer
    Meijer, Dennie
    Eppinga, Wietse S. C.
    Mohede, Roos M.
    Vanneste, Ben G. L.
    Meijnen, Philip
    Meijer, Otto W. M.
    Daniels, Laurien A.
    van den Bergh, Roderick C. N.
    Lont, Anne P.
    Ettema, Rosemarijn H.
    Oudshoorn, Frederik H. K.
    van Leeuwen, Pim J.
    van der Poel, Henk G.
    Donswijk, Maarten L.
    Oprea-Lager, Daniela E.
    Schaake, Eva E.
    Vis, Andre N.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2022, 5 (02): : 146 - 152
  • [26] Is Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Imaging Cost-effective in Prostate Cancer: An Analysis Informed by the proPSMA Trial
    Cardet, Rafael E. de Feria
    Hofman, Michael S.
    Segard, Tatiana
    Yim, Jackie
    Williams, Scott
    Francis, Roslyn J.
    Frydenberg, Mark
    Lawrentschuk, Nathan
    Murphy, Declan G.
    Lourenco, Richard De Abreu
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2021, 79 (03) : 413 - 418
  • [27] Defining Prostatic Vascular Pedicle Recurrence and the Anatomy of Local Recurrence of Prostate Cancer on Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography
    Dundee, Philip
    Furrer, Marc A.
    Corcoran, Niall M.
    Peters, Justin
    Pan, Henry
    Ballok, Zita
    Ryan, Andrew
    Guerrieri, Mario
    Costello, Anthony J.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE, 2022, 41 : 116 - 122
  • [28] Role of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PSMA-PET/CT) in staging
    Kesch, Claudia
    Franiel, Tobias
    Berliner, Christoph
    Fendler, Wolfgang P.
    Herrmann, Ken
    Hadaschik, Boris
    UROLOGIE, 2025, : 220 - 228
  • [29] Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomographye-Computed Tomography for Prostate Cancer: Distribution of Disease and Implications for Radiation Therapy Planning
    Gupta, Sandeep K.
    Watson, Tahne
    Denham, Jim
    Shakespeare, Thomas P.
    Rutherford, Natalie
    McLeod, Nicholas
    Picton, Kevin
    Ainsworth, Paul
    Bonaventura, Tony
    Martin, Jarad M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2017, 99 (03): : 701 - 709
  • [30] Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography as a Biomarker to Assess Treatment Response in Patients with Advanced Prostate Cancer
    Esen, Baris
    Herrmann, Ken
    Bavbek, Sevil
    Kordan, Yakup
    Tilki, Derya
    Esen, Tarik
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2023, 9 (04): : 596 - 605