Greater Power but Not Strength Gains Using Flywheel Versus Equivolumed Traditional Strength Training in Junior Basketball Players

被引:28
作者
Stojanovic, Marko D. M. [1 ]
Mikic, Mladen [1 ]
Drid, Patrik [1 ]
Calleja-Gonzalez, Julio [2 ]
Maksimovic, NebojSa [1 ]
Belegisanin, Bogdan [1 ]
Sekulovic, Veselin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Novi Sad, Fac Sport & Phys Educ, Adv Rehab & Conditioning Lab, Novi Sad 21000, Serbia
[2] Univ Basque Country UPV EHU, Fac Educ & Sport, Vitoria 01007, Spain
关键词
isoinertial training; strength training; vertical jump; change of direction ability;
D O I
10.3390/ijerph18031181
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The main aim of the present study was to compare the effects of flywheel strength training and traditional strength training on fitness attributes. Thirty-six well trained junior basketball players (n = 36; 17.58 +/- 0.50 years) were recruited and randomly allocated into: Flywheel group (FST; n = 12), traditional strength training group (TST; n = 12) and control group (CON; n = 12). All groups attended 5 basketball practices and one official match a week during the study period. Experimental groups additionally participated in the eight-week, 1-2 d/w equivolume intervention conducted using a flywheel device (inertia = 0.075 kg center dot m(-2)) for FST or free weights (80%1 RM) for TST. Pre-to post changes in lower limb isometric strength (ISOMET), 5 and 20 m sprint time (SPR5m and SPR20m), countermovement jump height (CMJ) and change of direction ability (t-test) were assessed with analyses of variance (3 x 2 ANOVA). Significant group-by-time interaction was found for ISOMET (F = 6.40; p = 0.000), CMJ (F = 7.45; p = 0.001), SPR5m (F = 7.45; p = 0.010) and T test (F = 10.46; p = 0.000). The results showed a significantly higher improvement in CMJ (p = 0.006; 11.7% vs. 6.8%), SPR5m (p = 0.001; 10.3% vs. 5.9%) and t-test (p = 0.045; 2.4% vs. 1.5%) for FST compared to the TST group. Simultaneously, th FST group had higher improvement in ISOMET (p = 0.014; 18.7% vs. 2.9%), CMJ (p = 0.000; 11.7% vs. 0.3%), SPR5m (p = 0.000; 10.3% vs. 3.4%) and t-test (p = 0.000; 2.4% vs. 0.6%) compared to the CON group. Players from the TST group showed better results in CMJ (p = 0.006; 6.8% vs. 0.3%) and t-test (p = 0.018; 1.5% vs. 0.6%) compared to players from the CON group. No significant group-by-time interaction was found for sprint 20 m (F = 2.52; p = 0.088). Eight weeks of flywheel training (1-2 sessions per week) performed at maximum concentric intensity induces superior improvements in CMJ, 5 m sprint time and change of direction ability than equivolumed traditional weight training in well trained junior basketball players. Accordingly, coaches and trainers could be advised to use flywheel training for developing power related performance attributes in young basketball players.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 12
页数:12
相关论文
共 53 条
  • [1] Hamstring injury occurrence in elite soccer players after preseason strength training with eccentric overload
    Askling, C
    Karlsson, J
    Thorstensson, A
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE & SCIENCE IN SPORTS, 2003, 13 (04) : 244 - 250
  • [2] Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology position paper: resistance training in children and adolescents
    Behm, David G.
    Faigenbaum, Avery D.
    Falk, Baraket
    Klentrou, Panagiota
    [J]. APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY NUTRITION AND METABOLISM, 2008, 33 (03) : 547 - 561
  • [3] Effectiveness of Traditional Strength vs. Power Training on Muscle Strength, Power and Speed with Youth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Behm, David G.
    Young, James D.
    Whitten, Joseph H. D.
    Reid, Jonathan C.
    Quigley, Patrick J.
    Low, Jonathan
    Li, Yimeng
    Lima, Camila D.
    Hodgson, Daniel D.
    Chaouachi, Anis
    Prieske, Olaf
    Granacher, Urs
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY, 2017, 8
  • [4] INTENDED RATHER THAN ACTUAL MOVEMENT VELOCITY DETERMINES VELOCITY-SPECIFIC TRAINING RESPONSE
    BEHM, DG
    SALE, DG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 1993, 74 (01) : 359 - 368
  • [5] A SIMPLE METHOD FOR MEASUREMENT OF MECHANICAL POWER IN JUMPING
    BOSCO, C
    LUHTANEN, P
    KOMI, PV
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY AND OCCUPATIONAL PHYSIOLOGY, 1983, 50 (02): : 273 - 282
  • [6] Anthropometry and performance of top youth international male basketball players in Spanish national academy
    Calleja-Gonzalez, Julio
    Mielgo-Ayuso, Juan
    Antonio Lekue, Jose
    Leibar, Xabier
    Erauzkin, Julen
    Jukic, Igor
    Ostojic, Sergej M.
    Gustavo Ponce-Gonzalez, Jesus
    Fuentes-Azpiroz, Maite
    Terrados, Nicolas
    [J]. NUTRICION HOSPITALARIA, 2018, 35 (06) : 1331 - 1339
  • [7] Muscular adaptations in response to three different resistance-training regimens: specificity of repetition maximum training zones
    Campos, GER
    Luecke, TJ
    Wendeln, HK
    Toma, K
    Hagerman, FC
    Murray, TF
    Ragg, KE
    Ratamess, NA
    Kraemer, WJ
    Staron, RS
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 2002, 88 (1-2) : 50 - 60
  • [8] Chiu LZF, 2006, J STRENGTH COND RES, V20, P555
  • [9] Effects of in-season enhanced negative work-based vs traditional weight training on change of direction and hamstrings-to-quadriceps ratio in soccer players
    Coratella, Giuseppe
    Beato, Marco
    Ce, Emiliano
    Scurati, Raffaele
    Milanese, Chiara
    Schena, Federico
    Esposito, Fabio
    [J]. BIOLOGY OF SPORT, 2019, 36 (03) : 241 - 248
  • [10] Developing Maximal Neuromuscular Power Part 2-Training Considerations for Improving Maximal Power Production
    Cormie, Prue
    McGuigan, Michael R.
    Newton, Robert U.
    [J]. SPORTS MEDICINE, 2011, 41 (02) : 125 - 146