Aerobic granular sludge: the future of wastewater treatment

被引:50
作者
Nancharaiah, Y., V [1 ,2 ]
Sarvajith, M. [1 ,2 ]
Mohan, T. V. Krishna [1 ]
机构
[1] Bhabha Atom Res Ctr, Water & Steam Chem Div, Kalpakkam 603102, Tamil Nadu, India
[2] BARC Training Sch Complex, Homi Bhabha Natl Inst, Mumbai 400094, Maharashtra, India
来源
CURRENT SCIENCE | 2019年 / 117卷 / 03期
关键词
Activated sludge; aerobic granulation; sequencing batch reactor; wastewater treatment; SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR; ACTIVATED-SLUDGE; NITROGEN REMOVAL; TREATMENT PLANTS; PERFORMANCE; TECHNOLOGY; BIOMASS; BIOREACTOR; CARBON; BIODEGRADATION;
D O I
10.18520/cs/v117/i3/395-404
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Water, food and energy security are interlinked and central to sustainable development. Wastewater is a key element in the water-food-energy nexus, and recovery of resources can link water, nutrient and energy cycles. Effective treatment of wastewater is essential for public health and sanitation, water reclamation, preventing environmental pollution and protecting water resources. Furthermore, the treated wastewater is a potential resource and its reuse will partially offset supply and demand in water-stressed areas. A century-old activated sludge (AS) process is still widely employed, though not sustainable in terms of large land footprint, higher costs and complex designs for achieving biological nutrient removal. The recently developed aerobic granular sludge (GS) process is a better replacement for AS and promises sustainable wastewater treatment for at least the next century. The GS process uses familiar sequencing batch reactor technology for simultaneous removal of organic carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus and other pollutants from wastewater. Among the available biological treatment options, GS process is the most preferred choice because of smaller land footprint, lower costs and effective wastewater treatment. Accumulating research shows that the GS technology has gained enormous popularity; it is increasingly considered for capacity extension as well as new wastewater treatment plants in domestic and industrial sectors.
引用
收藏
页码:395 / 404
页数:10
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   Biological nitrification-denitrification with alternating oxic and anoxic operations using aerobic granules [J].
Adav, Sunil S. ;
Lee, Duu-Jong ;
Lai, Juin-Yih .
APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2009, 84 (06) :1181-1189
[2]   Granule Formation Mechanisms within an Aerobic Wastewater System for Phosphorus Removal [J].
Barr, Jeremy J. ;
Cook, Andrew E. ;
Bond, Phillip L. .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2010, 76 (22) :7588-7597
[3]   A comparison of aerobic granular sludge with conventional and compact biological treatment technologies [J].
Bengtsson, Simon ;
de Blois, Mark ;
Wilen, Britt-Marie ;
Gustavsson, David .
ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 40 (21) :2769-2778
[4]   A review on the advances in nitrifying biofilm reactors and their removal rates in wastewater treatment [J].
Chaali, Mona ;
Naghdi, Mitra ;
Brar, Satinder K. ;
Avalos-Ramirez, Antonio .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2018, 93 (11) :3113-3124
[5]   Enhancing aerobic granulation for biological nutrient removal from domestic wastewater [J].
Coma, M. ;
Verawaty, M. ;
Pijuan, M. ;
Yuan, Z. ;
Bond, P. L. .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 103 (01) :101-108
[6]  
CPCB, 2018, ANN REP 2015 16
[7]  
de Bruin LMM, 2004, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V49, P1
[8]   Simultaneous COD, nitrogen, and phosphate removal by aerobic granular sludge [J].
de Kreuk, M ;
Heijnen, JJ ;
van Loosdrecht, MCM .
BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING, 2005, 90 (06) :761-769
[9]   Formation of aerobic granules with domestic sewage [J].
de Kreuk, Merle K. ;
van Loosdrecht, Mark C. M. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 2006, 132 (06) :694-697
[10]   Formation of aerobic granules for the treatment of real and low-strength municipal wastewater using a sequencing batch reactor operated at constant volume [J].
Derlon, Nicolas ;
Wagner, Jamile ;
Ribeiro da Costa, Rejane Helena ;
Morgenroth, Eberhard .
WATER RESEARCH, 2016, 105 :341-350