Inhibition of Return Decays Rapidly when Familiar Objects are Used

被引:1
|
作者
Niimi, Ryosuke [1 ]
Shimada, Hiroki [2 ]
Yokosawa, Kazuhiko [2 ]
机构
[1] Niigata Univ, Niigata, Japan
[2] Univ Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
attention; inhibition of return; IOR; faces; hands; VISUAL-SEARCH; DISCRIMINATION TASKS; CAPTURE ATTENTION; SPATIAL ATTENTION; TIME-COURSE; FACES; FACILITATION; HANDS;
D O I
10.1111/jpr.12149
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Visual search is supported by various components. Inhibition of return (IOR) is a mechanism by which orienting to a previously attended location or object is inhibited. In two experiments, we examined whether categories of real-life objects modify IOR. In Experiment 1, familiar objects (faces, hands, feet, chairs, and flowers) and a nonsense control object (a square) were presented as cues and participants were asked to detect a target presented either in a cued or uncued position. Body parts were examined since they have often been shown to influence visual selective attention. Results showed substantial IOR irrespective of cue object category. However, IOR decreased very rapidly, even in trials with a control cue. This atypical time course was not observed when only the control cue was used (Experiment 2). We concluded that the presence of various familiar objects in Experiment 1 acted as a context and modified observers' attentional sets. The results suggest that IOR in real-life scenes with familiar objects is different from IOR observed in typical experimental settings.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / 177
页数:11
相关论文
共 9 条
  • [1] Aging and Inhibition of Return to Locations and Objects
    Huether, Asenath X. A.
    Langley, Linda K.
    Thomas, Laura E.
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [2] When do fearful faces override inhibition of return?
    Silvert, Laetitia
    Funes, Maria J.
    ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2016, 163 : 124 - 134
  • [3] Peripheral stimuli generate different forms of inhibition of return when participants make prosaccades versus antisaccades to them
    Redden, Ralph S.
    Hilchey, Matthew D.
    Klein, Raymond M.
    ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2016, 78 (08) : 2283 - 2291
  • [4] When Is Inhibition of Return Input- or Output-Based? It Depends On How You Look At It
    Hilchey, Matthew D.
    Dohmen, Deniz
    Crowder, Nathan A.
    Klein, Raymond M.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE EXPERIMENTALE, 2016, 70 (04): : 325 - 334
  • [5] When do response-related episodic retrieval effects co-occur with inhibition of return?
    Hilchey, Matthew D.
    Rajsic, Jason
    Pratt, Jay
    ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2020, 82 (06) : 3013 - 3032
  • [6] When do response-related episodic retrieval effects co-occur with inhibition of return?
    Matthew D. Hilchey
    Jason Rajsic
    Jay Pratt
    Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 2020, 82 : 3013 - 3032
  • [7] DEFICIENT INHIBITION OF RETURN IN SUBCLINICAL OCD ONLY WHEN ATTENTION IS DIRECTED TO THE THREATENING ASPECTS OF A STIMULUS
    Harkin, Ben
    Kessler, Klaus
    DEPRESSION AND ANXIETY, 2012, 29 (09) : 807 - 815
  • [8] Response-specific effects in a joint action task: social inhibition of return effects do not emerge when observed and executed actions are different
    Manzone, Joseph
    Cole, Geoff G.
    Skarratt, Paul A.
    Welsh, Timothy N.
    PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG, 2017, 81 (05): : 1059 - 1071
  • [9] Peripheral stimuli generate different forms of inhibition of return when participants make prosaccades versus antisaccades to them
    Ralph S. Redden
    Matthew D. Hilchey
    Raymond M. Klein
    Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 2016, 78 : 2283 - 2291