Work content influences on cognitive task load, emotional state and performance during a simulated 520-days' Mars mission

被引:12
作者
Cohen, Iris [1 ,2 ]
den Braber, Nadia [2 ]
Smets, Nanja J. J. M. [1 ,2 ]
van Diggelen, Jurriaan [2 ]
Brinkman, Willem-Paul [1 ]
Neerincx, Mark A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] TNO, POB 23, NL-3769 ZG Soesterberg, Netherlands
[2] Delft Univ Technol, NL-2628 CD Delft, Netherlands
关键词
Emotional state; Cognitive task load; Performance; Stress; Appraisal; Human space flight; DECISION-MAKING; STRESS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.chb.2015.10.011
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
In high-risk domains such as human space flight, cognitive performances can be negatively affected by emotional responses to events and conditions in their working environment (e.g., isolation and health incidents). The COgnitive Performance and Error (COPE) model distinguishes effects of work content on cognitive task load and emotional state, and their effect on the professional's performance. This paper examines the relationships between these variables for a simulated Mars-mission. Six volunteers (well-educated and -motivated men) were isolated for 520 days in a simulated spacecraft in which they had to execute a (virtual) mission to Mars. As part of this mission, every other week, several computer tasks were performed. These tasks consisted of a negotiation game, a chat-based learning activity and an entertainment game. Before and after these tasks, and after post-task questionnaires, the participants rated their emotional state consisting of arousal, valence and dominance, and their cognitive task load consisting of level of information processing, time occupied and task-set switches. Results revealed significant differences between cognitive task load and emotional state levels when work content varied. Significant regression models were also found that could explain variation in task,performance. These findings contribute to the validation of the COPE model and Suggest that differences in appraisals for tasks may bring about different emotional states and task performances. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:642 / 652
页数:11
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   MEASURING EMOTION - THE SELF-ASSESSMENT MANNEQUIN AND THE SEMANTIC DIFFERENTIAL [J].
BRADLEY, MM ;
LANG, PJ .
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIOR THERAPY AND EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHIATRY, 1994, 25 (01) :49-59
[2]  
Cohen I., 2012, P 2012 EUR C COGN ER
[3]  
Delahaij R, 2009, COPING ACUTE STRESS
[4]  
Diggelen J. v., 2010, P MEAS BEH WAG NETH
[5]  
Driskell J.E., 1998, Making decisions under stress, P191, DOI [DOI 10.1037/10278-007, https://doi.org/10.1037/10278-007]
[6]   MULTIDIMENSIONAL ASSESSMENT OF COPING - A CRITICAL-EVALUATION [J].
ENDLER, NS ;
PARKER, JDA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1990, 58 (05) :844-854
[7]   In two minds: dual-process accounts of reasoning [J].
Evans, JST .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2003, 7 (10) :454-459
[8]   MOOD AND JUDGMENT - THE AFFECT INFUSION MODEL (AIM) [J].
FORGAS, JP .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1995, 117 (01) :39-66
[9]   Analysis of variance - Why it is more important than ever [J].
Gelman, A .
ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 2005, 33 (01) :1-31
[10]  
Gorbunov R, 2011, ECTA 2011/FCTA 2011: PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION THEORY AND APPLICATIONS AND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUZZY COMPUTATION THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, P5