Making Sense of Multi-Sensory Environments: A Scoping Review

被引:21
作者
Cameron, Allison [1 ]
Burns, Pippa [2 ]
Garner, Andrea [1 ]
Lau, Sim [3 ]
Dixon, Roselyn [1 ]
Pascoe, Carly [4 ]
Szafraniec, Michael [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wollongong, Fac Educ, Sch Educ, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Wollongong, Fac Sci Med & Hlth, Sch Med, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Wollongong, Fac Engn & Informat Sci, Sch Comp & Informat Technol, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
[4] CareWays Community Inc, Dapto, Australia
关键词
Dementia; mental health; education; intellectual disability; maternity care; scoping review; sensory environment; traumatic brain injury; SNOEZELEN ROOM; MENTAL-HEALTH; DEMENTIA; CARE; STIMULATION; PEOPLE; INTERVENTIONS; CHILDREN; BEHAVIOR; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1080/1034912X.2019.1634247
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
This article presents a review of studies published between 2006 and 2016 on research into multi-sensory environments (MSEs), as part of a project to develop a community-based MSE. This scoping review aimed to identify the settings MSEs are used in, rationale for implementation, equipment installed and the reported effects of the MSE upon users. The Scopus and Web of Science databases were searched for studies reporting on the applications and effects of MSEs. Thirty-three studies met the inclusion criteria and were allocated to groups based on the population they were designed for. These were mental health, intellectual and developmental disabilities, dementia, traumatic brain injuries and maternity. It was difficult to clearly determine what equipment, specific sensory experiences or patterns of implementation were most effective, due to the wide range of research designs and methodologies employed. Overall MSEs show promise through offering benefits to users with a range of disabilities or other conditions; however further studies are required to develop a stronger evidence base on the reported effects of MSEs for particular user groups. A framework has been proposed to address current inconsistencies in reporting the effectiveness of MSEs, to provide a more uniform approach.
引用
收藏
页码:630 / 656
页数:27
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   Findings from a Pilot Investigation of the Effectiveness of a Snoezelen Room in Residential Care: Should We Be Engaging with Our Residents More? [J].
Anderson, Katrina ;
Bird, Michael ;
MacPherson, Sarah ;
McDonough, Vikki ;
Davis, Terri .
GERIATRIC NURSING, 2011, 32 (03) :166-177
[2]  
Arksey H., 2005, INT J SOC RES METHOD, V8, P19, DOI [10.1080/1364557032000119616, DOI 10.1080/1364557032000119616]
[3]  
Ayres A.J., 1972, SENSORY INTEGRATION
[4]  
Ayres A.J., 1979, SENSORY INTEGRATION
[5]   An evaluation of Snoezelen® compared to 'common best practice' for allaying the symptoms of wandering and restlessness among residents with dementia in aged care facilities [J].
Bauer, Michael ;
Rayner, Jo-Anne ;
Tang, Judy ;
Koch, Susan ;
While, Christine ;
O'Keefe, Fleur .
GERIATRIC NURSING, 2015, 36 (06) :462-466
[6]   The use of multi-sensory interventions to manage dementia-related behaviours in the residential aged care setting: a survey of one Australian state [J].
Bauer, Michael ;
Rayner, Jo-Anne ;
Koch, Susan ;
Chenco, Carol .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2012, 21 (21-22) :3061-3069
[7]   Snoezelen® Empirical Review of Product Representation [J].
Botts, Betsy H. ;
Hershfeldt, Patti A. ;
Christensen-Sandfort, Robyn J. .
FOCUS ON AUTISM AND OTHER DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, 2008, 23 (03) :138-147
[8]   Internet Self-Management Uniform Reporting Framework [J].
Burns, Pippa ;
Jones, Sandra C. ;
Iverson, Don ;
Caputi, Peter .
CIN-COMPUTERS INFORMATICS NURSING, 2013, 31 (11) :554-565
[9]  
CareWays Community, US
[10]   Managerial and Frontline Perspectives on the Process of Evidence-Informed Practice Within Human Service Organizations [J].
Carnochan, Sarah ;
McBeath, Bowen ;
Austin, Michael J. .
HUMAN SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS MANAGEMENT LEADERSHIP & GOVERNANCE, 2017, 41 (04) :346-358