Emergency coronary artery bypass surgery in the contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention era

被引:140
|
作者
Seshadri, N
Whitlow, PL
Acharya, N
Houghtaling, P
Blackstone, EH
Ellis, SG
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Dept Cardiol, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[2] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Dept Internal Med, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[3] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Dept Biostat & Epidemiol, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[4] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
关键词
coronary disease; bypass; grafting; stents; angioplasty;
D O I
10.1161/01.CIR.0000036595.92742.69
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background-Since the advent of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs), technological advances, adjunctive pharmacotherapy, and increasing operator experience have contributed to lowering the occurrence of major complications. However, emergency coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) for failed PCI is still associated with important morbidity and mortality, even in the era of coronary stenting. We sought to determine the prevalence, indications, predictors, and complications of emergency CABG after PCI in the past decade. Methods and Results-We reviewed 18 593 PCIs performed from 1992 through 2000. There was a need for emergency CABG in 113 (0.61%) cases. The major indications were extensive dissection (n = 61, 54%), perforation/tamponade (n = 23, 20%), and recurrent acute closure (n = 23, 20%). Prevalence of emergency CABG decreased from 1.5% of PCIs in 1992 to 0.14% in 2000 (P < 0.001). Independent predictors of the need for emergency CABG included the worst ACC/AHA scoring of the intervened lesion (P < 0.001) and female sex (P = 0.028), whereas history of prior bypass surgery and use of stents resulted in a decreased need for emergency CABG (P < 0.001 for both). In patients undergoing emergency CABG, there were 17 (15%) in-hospital deaths, 14 (12%) perioperative Q-wave myocardial infarctions, and 6 (5%) cerebrovascular accidents. Conclusions-The need for emergency CABG has considerably decreased over time. Risk factors include female sex and a higher ACC/AHA score of the intervened lesion. However, morbidity and mortality of emergency CABG remain high even in the new millennium.
引用
收藏
页码:2346 / 2350
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Coronary Artery Perforations in the Current Era of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Kiernan, Thomas J.
    Yan, Bryan P.
    Cubeddu, Roberto J.
    Cruz-Gonzalez, Ignacio
    Rosenfield, Kenneth
    Palacios, Igor
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2008, 102 (8A): : 212I - 212I
  • [42] Commentary: Coronary artery bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention: Optimal revascularization for the younger patient
    Rocha, Rodolfo, V
    Elbatarny, Malak
    Tam, Derrick Y.
    Fremes, Stephen E.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2022, 163 (02): : 657 - 658
  • [43] Subgroup Analyses in Trial Reports Comparing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
    Head, Stuart J.
    Kaul, Sanjay
    Tijssen, Jan G. P.
    Serruys, Patrick W.
    Kappetein, A. Pieter
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2013, 310 (19): : 2097 - 2098
  • [44] Is the need for re-intervention higher with percutaneous coronary interventions or with coronary artery bypass surgery?
    New, G
    Moussa, I
    Veeramachaneni, V
    Mehran, R
    Dangas, G
    Lansky, A
    Adamian, M
    Roubin, GS
    Collins, MB
    Kreps, E
    Iyer, SS
    Leon, MB
    Subramanium, V
    Connelly, M
    Moses, JW
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2001, 37 (02) : 82A - 82A
  • [45] Performing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Without On-site Cardiac Surgery Is Not a License for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Instead of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
    Bakaeen, Faisal G.
    Blackstone, Eugene H.
    Svensson, Lars G.
    JAMA CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 2 (08) : 926 - 926
  • [46] Comparative Effectiveness of Multivessel Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery and Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Kumasawa, Junji
    Kurita, Noriaki
    Fukuhara, Shunichi
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2013, 159 (06) : 435 - 435
  • [47] Outcomes Following Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Previous Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
    Iqbal, Javaid
    Kwok, Chun Shing
    Kontopantelis, Evangelos
    de Belder, Mark A.
    Ludman, Peter F.
    Giannoudi, Marilena
    Gunning, Mark
    Zaman, Azfar
    Mamas, Mamas A.
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2016, 9 (04)
  • [48] Is percutaneous coronary intervention as effective as bypass surgery in left main stem coronary artery stenosis?
    Stiermaier, T.
    Schuler, G.
    Boudriot, E.
    Desch, S.
    Thiele, H.
    HERZ, 2013, 38 (02) : 147 - 152
  • [49] Impact of prior percutaneous coronary intervention on the outcome of coronary artery bypass surgery: A multicenter analysis
    Massoudy, Parwis
    Thielmann, Matthias
    Lehmann, Nils
    Marr, Anja
    Kleikamp, Georg
    Maleszka, Ariane
    Zittermann, Armin
    Koerfer, Reiner
    Radu, Miriam
    Krian, Arno
    Litmathe, Jens
    Gams, Emmeran
    Sezer, Oemer
    Scheld, Hans
    Schiller, Wolfgang
    Welz, Armin
    Dohmen, Guido
    Autschbach, Ruediger
    Slottosch, Ingo
    Wahlers, Thorsten
    Neuhaeuser, Markus
    Joeckel, Karl-Heinz
    Jakob, Heinz
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2009, 137 (04): : 840 - 845
  • [50] Percutaneous Coronary Interventions Prior to Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
    Niclauss, Lars
    Colombier, Sebastien
    Pretre, Rene
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2015, 30 (04) : 313 - 318