Comparison of Office, Ambulatory, and Home Blood Pressure Antihypertensive Response to Atenolol and Hydrochlorthiazide

被引:10
作者
Beitelshees, Amber L. [1 ]
Gong, Yan [2 ,3 ]
Bailey, Kent R. [4 ]
Turner, Stephen T. [4 ]
Chapman, Arlene B. [5 ]
Schwartz, Gary L. [4 ]
Gums, John G. [2 ,3 ]
Boerwinkle, Eric [6 ,7 ]
Johnson, Julie A. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Div Endocrinol Diabet & Nutr, Sch Med, Dept Med, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Coll Pharm, Dept Pharmacotherapy & Translat Res, Gainesville, FL USA
[3] Univ Florida, Coll Pharm, Ctr Pharmacogenom, Gainesville, FL USA
[4] Mayo Clin, Coll Med, Dept Med, Rochester, MN USA
[5] Emory Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Atlanta, GA USA
[6] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr, Ctr Human Genet, Houston, TX USA
[7] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr, Inst Mol Med, Houston, TX USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
TARGET-ORGAN DAMAGE; PROGNOSTIC VALUE; HYPERTENSION;
D O I
10.1111/j.1751-7176.2009.00185.x
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Office, home, and ambulatory blood pressure (BP) demonstrate variable associations with outcomes. The authors sought to compare office BP (OBP), home BP (HBP), and ambulatory BP (ABP) for measuring responses to hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ), atenolol, and their combination. After completing washout, eligible patients were randomized to atenolol 50 mg or HCTZ 12.5 mg daily. Doses were doubled after 3 weeks and the alternate drug was added after 6 weeks if BP was > 120/70 mm Hg (chosen to allow maximum opportunity to assess genetic associations with dual BP therapy in the parent study). OBP (in triplicate), HBP (twice daily for 5 days), and 24-hour ABP were measured at baseline, after monotherapy, and after combination therapy. BP responses were compared between OBP, HBP, and ABP for each monotherapy and combination therapy. In 418 patients, OBP overestimated BP response compared with HBP, with an average 4.6 mm Hg greater reduction in systolic BP (P <.0001) and 2.1 mm Hg greater reduction in diastolic BP (P <.0001) across all therapies. Results were similar for atenolol and HCTZ monotherapy. ABP response was more highly correlated with HBP response (r=0.58) than with OBP response (r=0.47; P=.04). In the context of a randomized clinical trial, the authors have identified significant differences in HBP, OBP, and ABP methods of measuring BP response to atenolol and HCTZ monotherapy.
引用
收藏
页码:14 / 21
页数:8
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] Discordant β-blocker effects on clinic, ambulatory, resting, and exercise hemodynamics in patients with hypertension
    Beitelshees, Amber L.
    Zineh, Issam
    Yarandi, Hossein N.
    Pauly, Daniel F.
    Johnson, Julie A.
    [J]. PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2006, 26 (09): : 1247 - 1254
  • [2] Prognostic significance of blood pressure measured in the office, at home and during ambulatory monitoring in older patients in general practice
    Fagard, RH
    Van Den Broeke, C
    De Cort, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HUMAN HYPERTENSION, 2005, 19 (10) : 801 - 807
  • [3] Lack of agreement between office and ambulatory blood pressure responses to hydrochlorothiazide
    Finkielman, JD
    Schwartz, GL
    Chapman, AB
    Boerwinkle, E
    Turner, ST
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2005, 18 (03) : 398 - 402
  • [4] Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring versus selfmeasurement of blood pressure at home: correlation with target organ damage
    Gaborieau, Valerie
    Delarche, Nicolas
    Gosse, Philippe
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2008, 26 (10) : 1919 - 1927
  • [5] GILL JS, 1985, LANCET, V1, P567
  • [6] Changes in Home Versus Clinic Blood Pressure With Antihypertensive Treatments A Meta-Analysis
    Ishikawa, Joji
    Carroll, Deirdre J.
    Kuruvilla, Sujith
    Schwartz, Joseph E.
    Pickering, Thomas G.
    [J]. HYPERTENSION, 2008, 52 (05) : 856 - U415
  • [7] Pharmacogenomics of antihypertensive drugs: Rationale and design of the Pharmacogenomic Evaluation of Antihypertensive Responses (PEAR) study
    Johnson, Julie A.
    Boerwinkle, Eric
    Zineh, Issain
    Chapman, Arlene B.
    Bailey, Kent
    Cooper-DeHoff, Rhonda M.
    Gums, John
    Curry, R. Whit
    Gong, Yan
    Beitelshees, Amber L.
    Schwartz, Gary
    Turner, Stephen T.
    [J]. AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2009, 157 (03) : 442 - 449
  • [8] Ambulatory versus clinic blood pressure for the assessment of antihypertensive efficacy in clinical trials:: Insights from the Val-Syst study
    Palatini, P
    Dorigatti, F
    Mugellini, A
    Spagnuolo, V
    Varì, N
    Ferrara, R
    Bertocchi, F
    [J]. CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2004, 26 (09) : 1436 - 1445
  • [9] Call to Action on Use and Reimbursement for Home Blood Pressure Monitoring A Joint Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association, American Society of Hypertension, and Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association
    Pickering, Thomas G.
    Miller, Nancy Houston
    Ogedegbe, Gbenga
    Krakoff, Lawrence R.
    Artinian, Nancy T.
    Goff, David
    [J]. HYPERTENSION, 2008, 52 (01) : 10 - 29
  • [10] Prognostic Influence of Office and Ambulatory Blood Pressures in Resistant Hypertension
    Salles, Gil F.
    Cardoso, Claudia R. L.
    Muxfeldt, Elizabeth S.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2008, 168 (21) : 2340 - 2346