The Rise and Fall of the Chaos Report Figures

被引:92
作者
Eveleens, J. Laurenz [1 ]
Verhoef, Chris [1 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Comp Sci, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Chaos report; Forecasting; Project success; Software; Software engineering; Standish group;
D O I
10.1109/MS.2009.154
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
In 1994, Standish published the Chaos report that showed a shocking 16 percent project success. This and renewed figures by Standish are often used to indicate that project management of application software development is in trouble. However, Standish's definitions have four major problems. First, they're misleading because they're based solely on estimation accuracy of cost, time, and functionality. Second, their estimation accuracy measure is one-sided, leading to unrealistic success rates. Third, steering on their definitions perverts good estimation practice. Fourth, the resulting figures are meaningless because they average numbers with an unknown bias, numbers that are introduced by different underlying estimation processes. The authors of this article applied Standish's definitions to their own extensive data consisting of 5,457 forecasts of 1,211 real-world projects, totaling hundreds of millions of Euros. The Standish figures didn't reflect the reality of the case studies at all. © 2010 IEEE.
引用
收藏
页码:30 / 36
页数:7
相关论文
共 16 条
[11]  
JOHNSON J, 2006, STANDISH WHY WERE PR
[12]   How large are software cost overruns? A review of the 1994 CHAOS report [J].
Jorgensen, M ;
Molokken-Ostvold, K .
INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 48 (04) :297-301
[13]  
Joy Bill., 1999, Information Technology Research Investing in Our Future
[14]  
LISTER T, 2002, BECOMING BETTER ESTI
[15]   Schedule estimation and uncertainty surrounding the cone of uncertainty [J].
Little, T .
IEEE SOFTWARE, 2006, 23 (03) :48-+
[16]   Frequently begged questions and how to answer them [J].
Zvegintzov, N .
IEEE SOFTWARE, 1998, 15 (02) :93-96