Acceptance, Benefits, and Challenges of Public Health-Oriented Pet Business Regulations in King County, Washington

被引:0
|
作者
Wierenga, Janelle [1 ]
Thiede, Hanne [2 ]
Helms, Leah [3 ]
Hopkins, Sharon [4 ]
机构
[1] Massey Univ, Inst Vet Anim & Biomed Sci, Tennent Dr, Palmerston North 4474, New Zealand
[2] Publ Hlth Seattle & King Cty, HIV STD Program, Seattle, WA USA
[3] Publ Hlth Seattle & King Cty, Environm Hlth Serv Div, Seattle, WA USA
[4] Univ Washington, Sch Publ Hlth & Community Med, Dept Epidemiol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH MANAGEMENT AND PRACTICE | 2016年 / 22卷 / 03期
关键词
pet businesses; health education; zoonotic disease prevention; infection control; public health inspections; FLORIDA ANIMAL SHELTER; MULTISTATE OUTBREAK; ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY; UNITED STATES; NORMAL FECES; DOG TREATS; HOST-RANGE; RAW MEAT; RISK; INFECTIONS;
D O I
10.1097/PHH.0000000000000272
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Context: New regulations were implemented in King County, Washington, in 2010 requiring pet businesses to obtain a permit from Public Health-Seattle & King County (Public Health) and undergo annual inspections to provide education and ensure compliance with regulatory standards. The regulations were developed as a tool for zoonotic disease control and prevention education for businesses and their customers, as well as for environmental protection. Objective: To assess the acceptance, benefits, and challenges of the new regulations and identify ways for Public Health to improve educational efforts and assist businesses with compliance. Design: Cross-sectional survey. Setting: King County, Washington. Participants: Pet businesses with Public Health permits in 2013. Main Outcome Measure: Self-administered survey responses. Results: The response rate was 40.5%. The majority of respondents provided grooming, pet day care, and kennel/boarding services from small, independent businesses. Sixty-one percent reported Public Health inspections as beneficial, especially concerning disinfection procedures and using an infection control plan. Almost three-fourths of respondents used the Public Health template to develop the infection control plan. Forty-four percent reported using the educational materials provided by Public Health, and 62% used educational materials from other sources. Most respondents reported that they gained benefits from the pet business permit, although fewer agreed that they obtained a good value from the permit and fee. The most common benefits reported were protection of animal and human health and establishing the credibility of the pet business. Conclusions: Major challenges with the implementation of the pet business regulations were not generally reported by respondents. Most respondents reported a collaborative relationship between Public Health and the pet businesses. Improvements in infection control practices and positive responses to the inspections were reported by pet businesses. Survey results were used to improve infection control plan templates, increase the use of educational materials, and improve the Web site and business portal performance.
引用
收藏
页码:301 / 308
页数:8
相关论文
共 7 条
  • [1] The University of Washington's Community-Oriented Public Health Practice Program and Public Health-Seattle & King County Partnership
    House, Peter J.
    Hartfield, Karen
    Nicola, Bud
    Bogan, Sharon L.
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH MANAGEMENT AND PRACTICE, 2014, 20 (03): : 285 - 289
  • [2] Evaluation of a public health Salmonella surveillance system in King County, Washington
    Takahashi, T
    Koehler, J
    Swenson, P
    Duchin, J
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2004, 32 (01) : 7 - 11
  • [3] The Role of Jail Testing in the Public Health Response to Syphilis in King County, Washington
    Buck, Taylor
    Herrera Perales, Luis Enrique
    Berzkalns, Anna
    Barash, Elizabeth
    Golden, Matthew R.
    Dombrowski, Julia C.
    SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES, 2025, 52 (03) : 135 - 140
  • [4] The Role of Jail Testing in the Public Health Response to Syphilis in King County, Washington
    Buck, T.
    Perales, Herrera L.
    Berzkalns, A.
    Barash, E.
    Golden, M. R.
    Dombrowski, J. C.
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2024, 72 (01) : 483 - 484
  • [5] A Public Health-Community Partnership to Address Lead Poisoning in King County, Washington
    de Acosta, Diego
    Ali, Mohamed
    Hamidi, Navid
    Anjaz, Ariana
    Mann, Erin
    Dawson-Hahn, Elizabeth
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2025, 115 (02) : 142 - 145
  • [6] Design of an Enhanced Public Health Surveillance System for Hepatitis C Virus Elimination in King County, Washington
    Baer, Atar
    Fagalde, Meaghan S.
    Drake, Curtis D.
    Sohlberg, Elisabeth H.
    Barash, Elizabeth
    Glick, Sara
    Millman, Alexander J.
    Duchin, Jeffrey S.
    PUBLIC HEALTH REPORTS, 2020, 135 (01) : 33 - 39
  • [7] Public Health-Seattle & King County and Washington State Department of Health Preexposure Prophylaxis Implementation Guidelines, 2015
    Golden, Matthew R.
    Lindquist, Scott
    Dombrowski, Julia C.
    SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES, 2016, 43 (04) : 264 - 265