An overview of fast convergent ordered-subsets reconstruction methods for emission tomography based on the incremental EM algorithm

被引:9
作者
Hsiao, Ing-Tsung [1 ]
Khurd, Parmeshwar
Rangarajan, Anand
Gindi, Gene
机构
[1] Chang Gung Univ, Dept Med Imaging & Radiol Sci, Tao Yuan 333, Taiwan
[2] SUNY Stony Brook, Dept Radiol, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
[3] SUNY Stony Brook, Dept Elect Engn, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
[4] Univ Florida, Dept CISE, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
关键词
emission tomographic reconstruction; ordered subsets; statistical reconstruction;
D O I
10.1016/j.nima.2006.08.152
中图分类号
TH7 [仪器、仪表];
学科分类号
0804 ; 080401 ; 081102 ;
摘要
Statistical reconstruction has become popular in emission computed tomography but suffers slow convergence (to the MAP or ML solution). Methods proposed to address this problem include the fast but non-convergent OSEM and the convergent RAMLA [J. Browne, A. De Pierro, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 15 (5) (1996) 687.] for the ML case, and the convergent BSREM [A. De Pierro, M. Yamagishi, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 20 (4) (2001) 280.], relaxed OS-SPS and modified BSREM [S. Ahn, J.A. Fessler, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 22 (5) (2003) 613.] for the MAP case. The convergent algorithms required a user-determined relaxation schedule. We proposed fast convergent OS reconstruction algorithms for both ML and MAP cases, called COSEM (Complete-data OSEM), which avoid the use of a relaxation schedule while maintaining convergence. COSEM is a form of incremental EM algorithm. Here, we provide a derivation of our COSEM algorithms and demonstrate COSEM using simulations. At early iterations, COSEM-ML is typically slower than RAMLA, and COSEM-MAP is typically slower than optimized BSREM while remaining much faster than conventional MAPEM. We discuss how COSEM may be modified to overcome these limitations. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:429 / 433
页数:5
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   Globally convergent image reconstruction for emission tomography using relaxed ordered subsets algorithms [J].
Ahn, S ;
Fessler, JA .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2003, 22 (05) :613-626
[2]   A unified approach to statistical tomography using coordinate descent optimization [J].
Bouman, CA ;
Sauer, K .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, 1996, 5 (03) :480-492
[3]   A row-action alternative to the EM algorithm for maximizing likelihoods in emission tomography [J].
Browne, J ;
DePierro, AR .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 1996, 15 (05) :687-699
[4]   Fast EM-like methods for maximum "a posteriori" estimates in emission tomography [J].
De Pierro, AR ;
Yamagishi, MEB .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2001, 20 (04) :280-288
[5]   A MODIFIED EXPECTATION MAXIMIZATION ALGORITHM FOR PENALIZED LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION IN EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY [J].
DEPIERRO, AR .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 1995, 14 (01) :132-137
[6]  
GUNAWARDANA A, 2001, THESIS J HOPKINS U
[7]   An accelerated convergent ordered subsets algorithm for emission tomography [J].
Hsiao, IT ;
Rangarajan, A ;
Khurd, P ;
Gindi, G .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2004, 49 (11) :2145-2156
[8]  
Hsiao IT, 2002, 2002 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON BIOMEDICAL IMAGING, PROCEEDINGS, P409, DOI 10.1109/ISBI.2002.1029281
[9]   A provably convergent OS-EM like reconstruction algorithm for emission tomography [J].
Hsiao, IT ;
Rangarajan, A ;
Gindi, G .
MEDICAL IMAGING 2002: IMAGE PROCESSING, VOL 1-3, 2002, 4684 :10-19
[10]  
HSIAO IT, 2004, P 2004 IEEE NUCL SCI