Extrapolation of Survival Curves Using Standard Parametric Models and Flexible Parametric Spline Models: Comparisons in Large Registry Cohorts with Advanced Cancer

被引:22
作者
Gray, Jodi [1 ]
Sullivan, Thomas [2 ,3 ]
Latimer, Nicholas R. [4 ]
Salter, Amy [3 ]
Sorich, Michael J. [1 ]
Ward, Robyn L. [5 ]
Karnon, Jonathan [1 ]
机构
[1] Flinders Univ S Australia, Flinders Hlth & Med Res Inst FHMRI, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
[2] South Australian Hlth & Med Res Inst SAHMRI, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[3] Univ Adelaide, Sch Publ Hlth, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[4] Univ Sheffield, Sch Hlth & Related Res ScHARR, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
[5] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
censoring; cost-effectiveness analysis; extrapolation; flexible parametric spline models; oncology; modeling; model selection; overall survival; parametric models; prediction; restricted mean survival time; Royston and Parmar spline models; survival analysis;
D O I
10.1177/0272989X20978958
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background It is often important to extrapolate survival estimates beyond the limited follow-up times of clinical trials. Extrapolated survival estimates can be highly sensitive to model choice; thus, appropriate model selection is crucial. Flexible parametric spline models have been suggested as an alternative to standard parametric models; however, their ability to extrapolate is not well understood. Aim To determine how well standard parametric and flexible parametric spline models predict survival when fitted to registry cohorts with artificially right-censored follow-up times. Methods Adults with advanced breast, colorectal, small cell lung, non-small cell lung, or pancreatic cancer with a potential follow-up time of 10 y were selected from the SEER 1973-2015 registry data set. Patients were classified into 15 cohorts by cancer and age group at diagnosis (18-59, 60-69, 70+ y). Follow-up times for each cohort were right censored at 20%, 35%, and 50% survival. Standard parametric models (exponential, Weibull, Gompertz, log-logistic, log-normal, generalized gamma) and spline models (proportional hazards, proportional odds, normal/probit) were fitted to the 10-y data set and the 3 right-censored data sets. Predicted 10-y restricted mean survival time and percentage surviving at 10 y were compared with the observed values. Results Across all data sets, the spline odds and spline normal models most frequently gave accurate predictions of 10-y survival outcomes. Visually, spline models tended to demonstrate better fit to the observed hazard functions than standard parametric models, both in the censored and 10-y data. Conclusions In these cohorts, where there was little uncertainty in the observed data, the spline models performed well when extrapolating beyond the observed data. Spline models should be routinely included in the set of models that are fitted when extrapolating cancer survival data.
引用
收藏
页码:179 / 193
页数:15
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Estimating the loss in expectation of life due to cancer using flexible parametric survival models [J].
Andersson, Therese M-L ;
Dickman, Paul W. ;
Eloranta, Sandra ;
Lambe, Mats ;
Lambert, Paul C. .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2013, 32 (30) :5286-5300
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Modelling Survival Data in Medical Research
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2018, SURV EP END RES SEER
[4]   Survival Analysis and Extrapolation Modeling of Time-to-Event Clinical Trial Data for Economic Evaluation: An Alternative Approach [J].
Bagust, Adrian ;
Beale, Sophie .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2014, 34 (03) :343-351
[5]   Survival Extrapolation in Cancer Immunotherapy: A Validation-Based Case Study [J].
Bullement, Ash ;
Latimer, Nicholas R. ;
Gorrod, Helen Bell .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2019, 22 (03) :276-283
[6]   Statistical issues and challenges in immuno-oncology [J].
Chen, Tai-Tsang .
JOURNAL FOR IMMUNOTHERAPY OF CANCER, 2013, 1
[7]   Cautions Regarding the Fitting and Interpretation of Survival Curves Examples from NICE Single Technology Appraisals of Drugs for Cancer [J].
Connock, Martin ;
Hyde, Chris ;
Moore, David .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2011, 29 (10) :827-837
[8]  
CRAN, MUH HAZ FUNCT EST SU
[9]  
Department of Health, 2016, Guidelines for Preparing a Submission to the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (Version 5.0)
[10]   Generalizability of cancer clinical trial results [J].
Elting, LS ;
Cooksley, C ;
Bekele, BN ;
Frumovitz, M ;
Avritscher, EBC ;
Sun, C ;
Bodurka, DC .
CANCER, 2006, 106 (11) :2452-2458