Considerations and recommendations for conducting qualitative research interviews with palliative and end-of-life care patients in the home setting: a consensus paper

被引:35
作者
Sivell, Stephanie [1 ]
Prout, Hayley [1 ]
Hopewell-Kelly, Noreen [1 ]
Baillie, Jessica [2 ]
Byrne, Anthony [1 ]
Edwards, Michelle [3 ]
Harrop, Emily [1 ]
Noble, Simon [1 ]
Sampson, Catherine [1 ]
Nelson, Annmarie [1 ]
机构
[1] Cardiff Univ, Marie Curie Palliat Care Res Ctr, Inst Canc & Genet, Sch Med, Cardiff CF14 4YS, S Glam, Wales
[2] Cardiff Univ, Sch Healthcare Sci, Cardiff, S Glam, Wales
[3] Swansea Univ, Coll Human & Hlth Sci, Ctr Innovat Ageing, Swansea, W Glam, Wales
关键词
ISSUES; CHALLENGES; ETHICS; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1136/bmjspcare-2015-000892
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives To present and discuss the views of researchers at an academic palliative care research centre on research encounters with terminally ill patients in the home setting and to generate a list of recommendations for qualitative researchers working in palliative and end-of-life care. Methods Eight researchers took part in a consensus meeting to discuss their experiences of undertaking qualitative interviews. The researchers were of varying backgrounds and all reported having experience in interviewing terminally ill patients, and all but one had experience of interviewing patients in their home environment. Results The main areas discussed by researchers included: whether participation in end-of-life research unintentionally becomes a therapeutic experience or an ethical concern; power relationships between terminally ill patients and researchers; researcher reflexivity and reciprocity; researchers' training needs. Qualitative methods can complement the home environment; however, it can raise ethical and practical challenges, which can be more acute in the case of research undertaken with palliative and patients at the end-of-life. Conclusions The ethical and practical challenges researchers face in this context has the potential to place both participant and researcher at risk for their physical and psychological well-being. We present a set of recommendations for researchers to consider prior to embarking on qualitative research in this context and advocate researchers in this field carefully consider the issues presented on a study-by-study basis.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Research sensitivities to palliative care patients [J].
Addington-Hall, J .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2002, 11 (03) :220-224
[2]   'As long as it helps somebody': why vulnerable people participate in research [J].
Alexander, Susan Jane .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE NURSING, 2010, 16 (04) :173-178
[3]   Positioning place: polylogic approaches to research methodology [J].
Anderson, Jon ;
Adey, Peter ;
Bevan, Paul .
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH, 2010, 10 (05) :589-604
[4]  
Anyan F., 2013, QUAL REP, V18, P1
[5]   Developing narrative reseach in supportive and palliative care: the focus on illness narratives [J].
Bingley, A. F. ;
Thomas, C. ;
Brown, J. ;
Reeve, J. ;
Payne, S. .
PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2008, 22 (05) :653-658
[6]   'Am I rambling?' on the advantages of interviewing couples together [J].
Bjornholt, Margunn ;
Farstad, Gunhild R. .
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH, 2014, 14 (01) :3-19
[7]  
Borbasi Sally, 2002, Contemp Nurse, V14, P24
[8]   Thoughts on the therapeutic use of narrative in the promotion of coping in cancer care [J].
Carlick, A ;
Biley, FC .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2004, 13 (04) :308-317
[9]   Issues of Disclosure and Intrusion: Ethical Challenges for a Community Researcher [J].
Carter, Kathleen ;
Banks, Sarah ;
Armstrong, Andrea ;
Kindon, Sara ;
Burkett, Ingrid .
ETHICS & SOCIAL WELFARE, 2013, 7 (01) :92-100
[10]   Are special ethical guidelines needed for palliative care research? [J].
Casarett, DJ ;
Karlawish, JHT .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2000, 20 (02) :130-139