Formal Evaluation of the Impact of Barriers and Connectors on Residential Burglars' Macro-Level Offending Location Choices

被引:65
作者
Clare, Joseph [1 ]
Fernandez, John [1 ]
Morgan, Frank [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Australia, Crime Res Ctr, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
关键词
DECISION-MAKING; DISTANCE DECAY; CRIME; VICTIMIZATION; NEIGHBORHOOD; AREAS; CITY;
D O I
10.1375/acri.42.2.139
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Previous research evaluating burglars' offending location choices has produced mixed findings about the influence of physical barriers and connectors on offender movement patterns. Consequently, this article utilises the discrete spatial choice approach to formally evaluate the impact of barriers and connectors on residential burglars' macro-level offending location choices. Data from Perth, Western Australia, demonstrated that physical barriers and connectors exert significant influence on offender decision-making at this level, and that the influence of impermeable barriers increases with proximity of these obstacles to the offender's point of origin. These findings provide formalised evidence for the independent importance of physical barriers and connectors in offender movement and are discussed with respect to current environmental criminology theory.
引用
收藏
页码:139 / 158
页数:20
相关论文
共 59 条
[21]  
Dunbar S.R., 1997, Coll. Math. J., V28, P187, DOI [10.1080/07468342.1997.11973860, DOI 10.1080/07468342.1997.11973860, 10.2307/26875223, DOI 10.2307/26875223]
[22]   MODELLING CRIME FLOW BETWEEN NEIGHBOURHOODS IN TERMS OF DISTANCE AND OF INTERVENING OPPORTUNITIES [J].
Elffers, Henk ;
Reynald, Danielle ;
Averdijk, Margit ;
Bernasco, Wim ;
Block, Richard .
CRIME PREVENTION & COMMUNITY SAFETY, 2008, 10 (02) :85-96
[23]  
Felson M., 2002, Community Safety, V4, P47, DOI DOI 10.1057/palgrave.cpcs.8140113
[24]   OFFENDER CHARACTERISTICS AND SPATIAL MOBILITY - AN EMPIRICAL-STUDY AND SOME POLICY IMPLICATIONS [J].
GABOR, T ;
GOTTHEIL, E .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CRIMINOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE CRIMINOLOGIE, 1984, 26 (03) :267-281
[25]   Let's practice what we preach: Turning tables into graphs [J].
Gelman, A ;
Pasarica, C ;
Dodhia, R .
AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, 2002, 56 (02) :121-130
[26]  
Giddens A., 1976, NEW RULES SOCIOLOGIC
[27]  
Hesseling R.B. P., 1992, J QUANT CRIMINOL, V8, P95, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF01062761
[28]  
Kastellec J.P., 2007, PERSPECTIVES POLITIC, V5, P755, DOI [DOI 10.1017/S1537592707072209, 10.1017/S1537592707072209]
[29]  
McFadden D., 1974, FRONTIERS ECONOMETRI, P105, DOI DOI 10.1108/EB028592
[30]   Examining burglars' target selection: Interview, experiment or ethnomethodology? [J].
Nee, C ;
Taylor, M .
PSYCHOLOGY CRIME & LAW, 2000, 6 (01) :45-59