The Value of Specialty Oncology Drugs

被引:48
作者
Goldman, Dana P. [1 ,2 ]
Jena, Anupam B. [3 ]
Lakdawalla, Darius N. [2 ]
Malin, Jennifer L. [4 ,5 ]
Malkin, Jesse D. [6 ]
Sun, Eric
机构
[1] Univ So Calif, Leonard D Schaeffer Ctr Hlth Policy & Econ, Sch Pharm, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
[2] Univ So Calif, Leonard D Schaeffer Ctr Hlth Policy & Econ, Sch Policy Planning & Dev, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Boston, MA USA
[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[5] Greater Los Angeles, Dept Vet Affairs, Los Angeles, CA USA
[6] RAND Corp, Santa Monica, CA USA
关键词
Willingness to pay; economic analysis; cost-benefit analysis; oncology; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; BREAST-CANCER; PRICE; CLAIMS; LIFE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.01059.x
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective To estimate patients' elasticity of demand, willingness to pay, and consumer surplus for five high-cost specialty medications treating metastatic disease or hematologic malignancies. Data Source/Study Setting Claims data from 71 private health plans from 1997 to 2005. Study Design This is a revealed preference analysis of the demand for specialty drugs among cancer patients. We exploit differences in plan generosity to examine how utilization of specialty oncology drugs varies with patient out-of-pocket costs. Data Collection/Extraction Methods We extracted key variables from administrative health insurance claims records. Principal Findings A 25 percent reduction in out-of-pocket costs leads to a 5 percent increase in the probability that a patient initiates specialty cancer drug therapy. Among patients who initiate, a 25 percent reduction in out-of-pocket costs reduces the number of treatments (claims) by 1-3 percent, depending on the drug. On average, the value of these drugs to patients who use them is about four times the total cost paid by the patient and his or her insurer, although this ratio may be lower for oral specialty therapies. Conclusions The decision to initiate therapy with specialty oncology drugs is responsive to price, but not highly so. Among patients who initiate therapy, the amount of treatment is equally responsive. The drugs we examine are highly valued by patients in excess of their total costs, although oral agents warrant further scrutiny as copayments increase.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 132
页数:18
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 12758 NBER
[2]  
[Anonymous], NY TIMES
[3]  
Becker Gary., 2007, The Value of Life near Its End and Terminal Care
[4]   Value-based insurance design [J].
Chernew, Michael E. ;
Rosen, Allison B. ;
Fendrick, A. Mark .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2007, 26 (02) :W195-W203
[5]   Estimating the price elasticity of expenditure for prescription drugs in the presence of non-linear price schedules: an illustration from Quebec, Canada [J].
Contoyannis, P ;
Hurley, J ;
Grootendorst, P ;
Jeon, SH ;
Tamblyn, R .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2005, 14 (09) :909-923
[6]   An inquiry into the different perspectives that can be used when eliciting preferences in health [J].
Dolan, P ;
Olsen, JA ;
Menzel, P ;
Richardson, J .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2003, 12 (07) :545-551
[7]   Benefit design and specialty drug use [J].
Goldman, Dana P. ;
Joyce, Geoffrey F. ;
Lawless, Grant ;
Crown, William H. ;
Willey, Vincent .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2006, 25 (05) :1319-1331
[8]   Bevacizumab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer [J].
Hurwitz, H ;
Fehrenbacher, L ;
Novotny, W ;
Cartwright, T ;
Hainsworth, J ;
Heim, W ;
Berlin, J ;
Baron, A ;
Griffing, S ;
Holmgren, E ;
Ferrara, N ;
Fyfe, G ;
Rogers, B ;
Ross, R ;
Kabbinavar, F .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 350 (23) :2335-2342
[9]   Does reimbursement influence chemotherapy treatment for cancer patients? [J].
Jacobson, M ;
O'Malley, AJ ;
Earle, CC ;
Pakes, J ;
Gaccione, P ;
Newhouse, JP .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2006, 25 (02) :437-443
[10]   Cost-effectiveness as a price control [J].
Jena, Anupam B. ;
Philipson, Tomas .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2007, 26 (03) :696-703