The "double eights mask brace" improves the fit and protection of a basic surgical mask amidst COVID-19 pandemic

被引:13
作者
Runde, Daniel P. [1 ]
Harland, Karisa K. [1 ,2 ]
Van Heukelom, Paul [1 ]
Faine, Brett [5 ]
O'Shaughnessy, Patrick [4 ]
Mohr, Nicholas M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Iowa, Dept Emergency Med, Coll Med, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[2] Univ Iowa, Dept Epidemiol, Coll Publ Hlth, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[3] Univ Iowa, Carver Coll Med, Dept Anesthesia, Div Crit Care, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[4] Univ Iowa, Coll Publ Hlth, Dept Occupat & Environm Hlth, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[5] Coll Pharm, Dept Pharm Practice & Sci, Iowa City, IA USA
关键词
COVID-19; infectious disease transmission; masks; patient-to-professional; SARS-CoV-2;
D O I
10.1002/emp2.12335
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Study objectiveThe COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in widespread shortages of personal protective equipment, including N95 respirators. Although basic surgical facemasks are more commonly available, their efficacy is limited due primarily to their poor face seal. This pilot study examined the impact of a rubber band mask brace on a basic surgical mask, as determined by quantitative fit testing. MethodsSubjects wearing a basic surgical facemask and the rubber band mask brace underwent quantitative fit testing using machinery designed to certify N95 mask fit. Subjects were tested with the brace anchored behind their ears, with a paperclip behind the head, and on the side knobs of their face shields. The primary outcome measure was whether the subject passed the quantitative fit test at or above the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)-verified standard for N95 masks. ResultsSubjects (n = 11) were 54.5% female, with a median height of 70 inches (interquartile range [IQR] = 68-74), weight of 170 pounds (IQR = 145-215), and body mass index (BMI) of 24.6 (IQR = 22.2-27.2), and encompassing 5 distinct N95 mask fit types. We found that 45%, 100%, and 100% of subjects passed the quantitative fit test when the brace was anchored behind the ears, with a paperclip and on a face shield, respectively. ConclusionOf the 11 subjects included in the analysis, across a range of body habitus and N95 mask fit types, all passed the quantitative fit test when the mask brace was anchored on either face shield or with a paperclip. This data suggests that although the brace does not create an N95 equivalent in terms of filtration, it would offer improved protection from airborne viruses when worn with a basic surgical mask.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 5 条
[1]  
CHEN CC, 1993, AM IND HYG ASSOC J, V54, P51, DOI 10.1202/0002-8894(1993)054<0051:LAFCOF>2.0.CO
[2]  
2
[3]   Physical distancing, face masks, and eye protection to prevent person-to-person transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Chu, Derek K. ;
Akl, Elie A. ;
Duda, Stephanie ;
Solo, Karla ;
Yaacoub, Sally ;
Schunemann, Holger J. .
LANCET, 2020, 395 (10242) :1973-1987
[4]  
Janssen L, 2005, J INT SOC RESP PROT, V22, P122, DOI 10.3320/1.2753437
[5]   Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks [J].
Konda, Abhiteja ;
Prakash, Abhinav ;
Moss, Gregory A. ;
Schmoldt, Michael ;
Grant, Gregory D. ;
Guha, Supratik .
ACS NANO, 2020, 14 (05) :6339-6347