Theoretical and Practical Guidance for Incorporating Auditor-Client Communication in Experimental Research

被引:8
作者
Hatfield, Richard C. [1 ]
Saiewitz, Aaron [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama, Culverhouse Coll Business, Culverhouse Sch Accountancy, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487 USA
[2] Univ Nevada, Lee Business Sch, Las Vegas, NV USA
来源
AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY | 2022年 / 41卷 / 04期
关键词
research methods; auditor-client communication; Social Presence Theory; inquiry; negotiation; persuasion; PERSUASION TACTICS; NEGOTIATION EXPERIENCE; STAFF AUDITORS; MANAGEMENT; JUDGMENTS; IMPACT; INFORMATION; CONCESSIONS; POSITIONS; MATTERS;
D O I
10.2308/AJPT-2019-520
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
In this paper, we provide theoretical and practical guidance on experimental design choices when incorporating auditor-client communication in audit research. We structure our discussion around Social Presence Theory, noting how elements of social presence impact theoretical predictions and the related experimental design. We then compare non-interactive, highly controlled paper/computer-based studies with studies that involve automated interaction, interaction with an actor, or interaction between participants. We provide a discussion of best practices and pitfalls related to these different experimental design choices, including theoretical and logistical considerations, as well as recent innovations in this area. While our methodological discussion is nested in auditor-client communication research, these methods and logistical considerations are applicable to most accounting experiments designed to address research questions steeped in social psychology (i.e., contexts of human interaction).
引用
收藏
页码:163 / 177
页数:15
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), 2021, AUD EV NO C SECT 500
[2]   CONSERVATISM AND AUDITOR-CLIENT NEGOTIATIONS [J].
ANTLE, R ;
NALEBUFF, B .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 1991, 29 :31-54
[3]   A comparison of auditor and client initial negotiation positions and tactics [J].
Bame-Aldred, Charles W. ;
Kida, Thomas .
ACCOUNTING ORGANIZATIONS AND SOCIETY, 2007, 32 (06) :497-511
[4]   Group Judgment and Decision Making in Auditing: Research in the Time of COVID-19 and Beyond [J].
Bauer, Tim D. ;
Humphreys, Kerry A. ;
Trotman, Ken T. .
AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY, 2022, 41 (01) :3-23
[5]   Staff auditors' proclivity for computer-mediated communication with clients and its effect on skeptical behavior [J].
Bennett, G. Bradley ;
Hatfield, Richard C. .
ACCOUNTING ORGANIZATIONS AND SOCIETY, 2018, 68-69 :42-57
[6]   The Effect of Deadline Pressure on Pre-Negotiation Positions: A Comparison of Auditors and Client Management [J].
Bennett, G. Bradley ;
Hatfield, Richard C. ;
Stefaniak, Chad .
CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2015, 32 (04) :1507-+
[7]   The Effect of the Social Mismatch between Staff Auditors and Client Management on the Collection of Audit Evidence [J].
Bennett, G. Bradley ;
Hatfield, Richard C. .
ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2013, 88 (01) :31-50
[8]   The Impact of Management Alumni Affiliation and Persuasion Tactics on Auditors' Internal Control Judgments [J].
Bhattacharjee, Sudip ;
Brown, J. Owen .
ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2018, 93 (02) :97-115
[9]   The Interplay of Interpersonal Affect and Source Reliability on Auditors' Inventory Judgments [J].
Bhattacharjee, Sudip ;
Moreno, Kimberly K. ;
Riley, Tracey .
CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2012, 29 (04) :1087-+
[10]   The Effect of Staff Auditor Reputation on Audit Quality Enhancing Actions [J].
Blum, Emily S. ;
Hatfield, Richard C. ;
Houston, Richard W. .
ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2022, 97 (01) :75-97