Feasibility of a subcutaneous gluteal turnover flap without donor site scar for perineal closure after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer

被引:19
作者
Blok, R. D. [1 ,2 ]
Hagemans, J. A. W. [3 ]
Burger, J. W. A. [3 ,4 ]
Rothbarth, J. [3 ]
van der Bile, J. D. W. [5 ]
Lapid, O. [6 ]
Hompes, R. [1 ]
Tanis, P. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Meibergdreef 9,Post Box 22660, NL-1100 DD Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Canc Ctr Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, LEXOR,Ctr Expt & Mol Med,Oncode Inst, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Erasmus MC, Canc Inst, Dept Surg Oncol, Doctor Molewaterpl 40, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[4] Catharina Hosp, Dept Surg, Michelangelolaan 2, Eindhoven, Netherlands
[5] Flevo Hosp, Dept Surg, Hosp Weg 1, Almere, Netherlands
[6] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Amsterdam UMC, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Rectal neoplasms; Abdominoperineal resection; Surgical flaps; Tissue transfer; Gluteal turnover flap; Perineal wound healing; MYOCUTANEOUS FLAP; RECONSTRUCTION; COMPLICATIONS; MORBIDITY;
D O I
10.1007/s10151-019-02055-1
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Abdominoperineal resection (APR) carries a high risk of perineal wound morbidity. Perineal wound closure using autologous tissue flaps has been shown to be advantageous, but there is no consensus as to the optimal method. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of a novel gluteal turnover flap (GT-flap) without donor site scar for perineal closure after APR. Methods Consecutive patients who underwent APR for primary or recurrent rectal cancer were included in a prospective non-randomised pilot study in two academic centres. Perineal reconstruction consisted of a unilateral subcutaneous GT-flap, followed by midline closure. Feasibility was defined as uncomplicated perineal wound healing at 30 days in at least five patients, and a maximum of two flap failures. Results Out of 17 potentially eligible patients, 10 patients underwent APR with GT-flap-assisted perineal wound closure. Seven patients had pre-operative radiotherapy. Median-added theatre time was 38 min (range 35-44 min). Two patients developed a superficial perineal wound dehiscence, most likely because of the excessive width of the skin island. Two other patients developed purulent discharge and excessive serosanguinous discharge, respectively, resulting in four complicated wounds at 30 days. No flap failure occurred, and no radiological or surgical reinterventions were performed. Median length of hospital stay was 10 days (IQR 8-12 days). Conclusions The GT-flap for routine perineal wound closure after APR seems feasible with limited additional theatre time, but success seems to depend on correct planning of the width of the flap. The potential for reducing perineal morbidity should be evaluated in a randomised controlled trial.
引用
收藏
页码:751 / 759
页数:9
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Persistent perineal morbidity is common following abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer
    Asplund, Dan
    Prytz, Mattias
    Bock, David
    Haglind, Eva
    Angenete, Eva
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2015, 30 (11) : 1563 - 1570
  • [2] Prone cylindrical abdominoperineal resection with subsequent rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap reconstruction performed by a colorectal surgeon
    Barker, Jonathan A.
    Blackmore, Alexander E.
    Owen, Richard P.
    Rate, Anthony
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2013, 28 (06) : 801 - 806
  • [3] Barrie J, 2018, COLORECTAL DIS
  • [4] Blok RD, 2019, DIS COLON RECTUM
  • [5] Blok RD, 2019, ANN SURG
  • [6] Snapshot Study on the Value of Omentoplasty in Abdominoperineal Resection with Primary Perineal Closure for Rectal Cancer
    Blok, Robin D.
    Musters, Gijsbert D.
    Borstlap, Wernard A. A.
    Buskens, Christianne J.
    Bemelman, Wilhelmus A.
    Tanis, Pieter J.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 25 (03) : 729 - 736
  • [7] Outcomes of immediate vertical rectus Abdominis myocutaneous flap reconstruction for irradiated abdominoperineal resection defects
    Butler, Charles E.
    Gundeslioglu, A. Ozlem
    Rodriguez-Bigas, Miguel A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2008, 206 (04) : 694 - 703
  • [8] The Perineal Turnover Perforator Flap: A New and Simple Technique for Perineal Reconstruction After Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision
    Chasapi, Maria
    Maher, Mohamed
    Mitchell, Peter
    Dalal, Milind
    [J]. ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2018, 80 (04) : 395 - 399
  • [9] Impact of Flap Reconstruction on Perineal Wound Complications Following Ablative Surgery for Advanced and Recurrent Rectal Cancers
    Davidge, Kristen M.
    Raghuram, Kamini
    Hofer, Stefan O. P.
    Ferguson, Peter C.
    Wunder, Jay S.
    Swallow, Carol J.
    Zhong, Toni
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 21 (06) : 2068 - 2073
  • [10] Primary versus Flap Closure of Perineal Defects following Oncologic Resection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Devulapalli, Chris
    Wei, Anne Tong Jia
    DiBiagio, Jennifer R.
    Baez, Marcelo L.
    Baltodano, Pablo A.
    Seal, Stella M.
    Sacks, Justin M.
    Cooney, Carisa M.
    Rosson, Gedge D.
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2016, 137 (05) : 1602 - 1613