The lubricant film for head/disk application consists of bonded fraction and unbonded (mobile) fraction. It is well known that the mobile fraction of the lubricant film can replenish the surface sites where the lubricant film was depleted, thus, the surface wear is postponed or alleviated. With a continuous decrease in the head disk spacing, however, too much mobile fraction of lubricant may cause head slider lubricant pick-up, and deteriorate the interface. Two perfluoropolyether (PFPE) lubricants of Z-tetraol and Z-DOL are discussed in this paper. Lubricant Z-tetraol is characteristic of stronger bonding to a carbon overcoat, lower vapor pressure, and higher thermal stability but less mobility than Z-DOL. It is found that, for CSS (contact-start-stop) durability, the interfaces with Z-tetraol show no worse in performance than those with Z-DOL, and less head slider lubricant pick-up on those with Z-tetraol. Based on the above-mentioned, it is possible that the interfaces relying more on the lubricant bonding strength and chemical structure stability are more beneficial to tribological performances than those relying more on the lubricant replenishment. The effects of lubricant additive X1P mixed to Z-tetraol, and Z-DOL, respectively are also studied on tribological performances. Stiction, CSS durability, and head slider lubricant pick-up are discussed among lubricants Z-tetraol, Z-DOL, Z-tetraol/X1P and Z-DOL/X1P. Statistical t-test, F-test, and Weibull analyses are applied to CSS data to differentiate CSS durability performances. Additive X1P is found to enhance CSS durability for both lubricants. Lubricant Z-tetraol/X1P is recommended for the best tribological performances, followed by Z-DOL/X1P, Z-tetraol, and Z-DOL.