Understanding Adoption and Impacts of Conservation Agriculture in Eastern and Southern Africa: A Review

被引:18
作者
Ngoma, Hambulo [1 ,5 ]
Angelsen, Arild [2 ,3 ]
Jayne, Thomas S. [4 ]
Chapoto, Antony [1 ]
机构
[1] Indaba Agr Policy Res Inst, Lusaka, Zambia
[2] Norwegian Univ Life Sci, Sch Econ & Business, As, Norway
[3] Ctr Int Forestry Res, Bogor, Indonesia
[4] Michigan State Univ, Dept Agr Food & Resource Econ, E Lansing, MI USA
[5] Int Maize & Wheat Improvement Ctr CIMMYT, Harare, Zimbabwe
来源
FRONTIERS IN AGRONOMY | 2021年 / 3卷
关键词
conservation agriculture (CA); adoption; productivity; Eastern and Southern Africa; impacts; SOIL CARBON SEQUESTRATION; SMALLHOLDER FARMERS; MINIMUM TILLAGE; FARMING PRACTICES; CLIMATE-SMART; MAIZE YIELDS; ADAPTATION; SYSTEMS; INTENSIFICATION; PRODUCTIVITY;
D O I
10.3389/fagro.2021.671690
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Conservation Agriculture (CA) aims to concurrently promote agricultural productivity, local livelihoods, climate resilience and other environmental objectives. We review the emerging evidence base in Eastern and Southern Africa to address whether CA is climate smart and why adoption rates by smallholders remain generally very low. We first develop an adoption framework that can be used to assess when and where the different components of CA are expected to be adopted under different conditioning factors and consider options to make CA climate smart. Our results suggest that CA can contribute positively to productivity and adaptation/resilience objectives, although the degree of success varies considerably by farm, household and regional characteristics. Overall, we find that capital-intensive (mechanized) CA is more likely to be adopted in areas of economic dynamism where capital is cheap relative to labor. Labor-intensive CA practices are more likely to be adopted in regions of economic stagnation where capital is expensive, and labor is abundant and cheap. A subnational focus is needed to identify economic conditions of different regions and agro-ecological zones and to test hypotheses derived from the framework in this paper and to propose the most appropriate CA packages for promotion. Our findings suggest that labor using variants of CA such as planting basins are more likely to be adopted than are capital using mechanized options in densely populated parts of Malawi, Ethiopia, Kenya, Tanzania, Zambia and Zimbabwe where labor is abundant, and presumably cheap, but capital is expensive. However, rising land scarcity (prices) and wages in the region present an opportunity for capital intensive, mechanized CA operations to be adopted if the cost of capital can be kept low and if there is a supportive environment for mechanization. We conclude that CA is climate smart and if adopted widely, it has the potential to help build resilience in smallholder farming systems. CA can be more climate smart, and its uptake can be enhanced by reframing, better targeting, adapting CA to location-specific economic and biophysical, and through greater and more effective public spending on agricultural research and development.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]   Impact of conservation agriculture technology on household welfare in Zambia [J].
Abdulai, Abdul Nafeo .
AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2016, 47 (06) :729-741
[2]   Examining the impact of conservation agriculture on environmental efficiency among maize farmers in Zambia [J].
Abdulai, Abdul-Nafeo ;
Abdulai, Awudu .
ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2017, 22 (02) :177-201
[3]   Improving Welfare Through Climate-Friendly Agriculture: The Case of the System of Rice Intensification [J].
Alem, Yonas ;
Eggert, Hakan ;
Ruhinduka, Remidius .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2015, 62 (02) :243-263
[4]  
Andersson J A., 2012, Contested agronomy: Agricultural research in a changing world, P22
[5]   From adoption claims to understanding farmers and contexts: A literature review of Conservation Agriculture (CA) adoption among smallholder farmers in southern Africa [J].
Andersson, Jens A. ;
D'Souza, Shereen .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 187 :116-132
[6]   Smallholder productivity and weather shocks: Adoption and impact of widely promoted agricultural practices in Tanzania [J].
Arslan, Aslihan ;
Belotti, Federico ;
Lipper, Leslie .
FOOD POLICY, 2017, 69 :68-81
[7]   Climate Smart Agriculture? Assessing the Adaptation Implications in Zambia [J].
Arslan, Aslihan ;
McCarthy, Nancy ;
Lipper, Leslie ;
Asfaw, Solomon ;
Cattaneo, Andrea ;
Kokwe, Misael .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2015, 66 (03) :753-780
[8]   Adoption and intensity of adoption of conservation farming practices in Zambia [J].
Arslan, Aslihan ;
McCarthy, Nancy ;
Lipper, Leslie ;
Asfaw, Solomon ;
Cattaneo, Andrea .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 187 :72-86
[9]   Impact of modern agricultural technologies on smallholder welfare: Evidence from Tanzania and Ethiopia [J].
Asfaw, Solomon ;
Shiferaw, Bekele ;
Simtowe, Franklin ;
Lipper, Leslie .
FOOD POLICY, 2012, 37 (03) :283-295
[10]   Toward a theory of resilience for international development applications [J].
Barrett, Christopher B. ;
Constas, Mark A. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2014, 111 (40) :14625-14630