The bright and dark sides of leader traits: A review and theoretical extension of the leader trait paradigm

被引:523
作者
Judge, Timothy A. [1 ]
Piccolo, Ronald F. [2 ]
Kosalka, Tomek [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[2] Rollins Coll, Winter Pk, FL 32789 USA
[3] Univ Cent Florida, Orlando, FL 32816 USA
关键词
Leadership; Personality; Leader trait; SOCIAL-DOMINANCE ORIENTATION; 5 PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS; CORE SELF-EVALUATIONS; JOB-PERFORMANCE; CHARISMATIC LEADERSHIP; SHARED LEADERSHIP; 5-FACTOR MODEL; NARCISSISTIC PERSONALITY; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; BEHAVIORAL-GENETICS;
D O I
10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.09.004
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The leader trait perspective is perhaps the most venerable intellectual tradition in leadership research. Despite its early prominence in leadership research. it quickly fell out of favor among leadership scholars. Thus, despite recent empirical support for the perspective, conceptual work in the area lags behind other theoretical perspectives, Accordingly, the present review attempts to place the leader trait perspective in the context of supporting intellectual traditions, including evolutionary psychology and behavioral genetics. We present a conceptual model that considers the source of leader traits. mediators and moderators of their effects on leader emergence and leadership effectiveness, and distinguish between perceived and actual leadership effectiveness. We consider both the positive and negative effects of specific "bright side" personality traits: the Big Five traits, core self-evaluations, intelligence, and charisma. We also consider the positive and negative effects of "dark side" leader traits: Narcissism, hubris, dominance, and Machiavellianism. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:855 / 875
页数:21
相关论文
共 185 条
[1]   Highly dominating, highly authoritarian personalities [J].
Altemeyer, B .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 144 (04) :421-447
[2]   What breaks a leader: The curvilinear relation between assertiveness and leadership [J].
Ames, Daniel R. ;
Flynn, Francis J. .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 92 (02) :307-324
[3]  
Andersen J.A., 2006, J SOCIO-ECON, V35, P1078, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.SOCEC.2005.11.066
[4]   Who attains social status? Effects of personality and physical attractiveness in social groups [J].
Anderson, C ;
John, OP ;
Keltner, D ;
Kring, AM .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 81 (01) :116-132
[5]   Why Do Dominant Personalities Attain Influence in Face-to-Face Groups? The Competence-Signaling Effects of Trait Dominance [J].
Anderson, Cameron ;
Kilduff, Gavin J. .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 96 (02) :491-503
[6]   The determinants of leadership role occupancy: Genetic and personality factors [J].
Arvey, RD ;
Rotundo, M ;
Johnson, W ;
Zhang, Z ;
McGue, M .
LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY, 2006, 17 (01) :1-20
[7]  
Barker R.A., 1994, Journal of Leadership Organizational Studies, V1, P46, DOI DOI 10.1177/107179199400100205
[8]   THE BIG 5 PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB-PERFORMANCE - A METAANALYSIS [J].
BARRICK, MR ;
MOUNT, MK .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 44 (01) :1-26
[9]   Personality and job performance: Test of the mediating effects of motivation among sales representatives [J].
Barrick, MR ;
Stewart, GL ;
Piotrowski, M .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 87 (01) :43-51
[10]  
Bass B.M., 1985, Leadership and Performance beyond Expectations, DOI DOI 10.1002/HRM.3930250310