Measuring Cultural Dimensions: External Validity and Internal Consistency of Hofstede's VSM 2013 Scales

被引:28
作者
Gerlach, Philipp [1 ]
Eriksson, Kimmo [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Fresenius Univ Appl Sci, Fac Business & Media, Psychol Sch, Hamburg, Germany
[2] Malardalen Univ, Sch Educ Culture & Commun, Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Inst Futures Studies, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
cultural dimensions; cultural values; Hofstede; indulgence; power distance; individualism; replication; validation; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; ET-AL; VALUES; INDIVIDUALISM; COLLECTIVISM; CONSEQUENCES; PITFALLS;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2021.662604
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Cross-cultural comparisons often investigate values that are assumed to have long-lasting influence on human conduct and thought. To capture and compare cultural values across cultures, Geert Hofstede's Cultural Dimensions Theory has offered an influential framework. Hofstede also provided a survey instrument, the Values Survey Module (VSM), for measuring cultural values as outlined in his Cultural Dimensions Theory. The VSM has since been subject to a series of revisions. Yet, data on countries have been derived from the original VSM - and not on one of the revised versions of VSM. We tested three scales (indulgence, power distance, and individualism) from the latest version, the VSM 2013, as part of a larger survey across 57 countries. Two main findings emerged. For one thing, country scores based on the VSM 2013 scales correlated only weakly with country scores of the same cultural dimensions obtained in a large previous study. Thus, the validity of the VSM 2013 is in doubt. For another thing, the internal consistency of the VSM 2013 scales was overall poor, indicating that the scales did not reliably measure well-defined constructs. We discuss implications for cross-cultural research.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2014, WORLD VALUES SURVEY
[2]   Hofstede never studied culture [J].
Baskerville, RF .
ACCOUNTING ORGANIZATIONS AND SOCIETY, 2003, 28 (01) :1-14
[3]   Dimensions and Dynamics of National Culture: Synthesizing Hofstede With Inglehart [J].
Beugelsdijk, Sjoerd ;
Welzel, Chris .
JOURNAL OF CROSS-CULTURAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 49 (10) :1469-1505
[4]  
DeVellis RF, 2017, Scale Development: Theory and Applications
[5]  
Eriksson K, 2021, NAT COMMUN, V12, DOI 10.1038/s41467-021-21602-9
[6]   Differences Between Tight and Loose Cultures: A 33-Nation Study [J].
Gelfand, Michele J. ;
Raver, Jana L. ;
Nishii, Lisa ;
Leslie, Lisa M. ;
Lun, Janetta ;
Lim, Beng Chong ;
Duan, Lili ;
Almaliach, Assaf ;
Ang, Soon ;
Arnadottir, Jakobina ;
Aycan, Zeynep ;
Boehnke, Klaus ;
Boski, Pawel ;
Cabecinhas, Rosa ;
Chan, Darius ;
Chhokar, Jagdeep ;
D'Amato, Alessia ;
Ferrer, Montse ;
Fischlmayr, Iris C. ;
Fischer, Ronald ;
Fueloep, Marta ;
Georgas, James ;
Kashima, Emiko S. ;
Kashima, Yoshishima ;
Kim, Kibum ;
Lempereur, Alain ;
Marquez, Patricia ;
Othman, Rozhan ;
Overlaet, Bert ;
Panagiotopoulou, Penny ;
Peltzer, Karl ;
Perez-Florizno, Lorena R. ;
Ponomarenko, Larisa ;
Realo, Anu ;
Schei, Vidar ;
Schmitt, Manfred ;
Smith, Peter B. ;
Soomro, Nazar ;
Szabo, Erna ;
Taveesin, Nalinee ;
Toyama, Midori ;
Van de Vliert, Evert ;
Vohra, Naharika ;
Ward, Colleen ;
Yamaguchi, Susumu .
SCIENCE, 2011, 332 (6033) :1100-1104
[7]   The pitfalls of cross-national survey research: A reply to the article by Spector et al. on the psychometric properties of the Hofstede values survey module 1994 [J].
Hofstede, G .
APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW-PSYCHOLOGIE APPLIQUEE-REVUE INTERNATIONALE, 2002, 51 (01) :170-173
[8]  
Hofstede G., 1980, CULTURAL CONSEQUENCE
[9]  
Hofstede G., 2013, Values Survey Module 2013 Manual
[10]  
Hofstede G., 1991, CULTURES ORG, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0005-7967(02)00184-5