Sex differences in fetal growth and immediate birth outcomes in a low-risk Caucasian population

被引:51
作者
Galjaard, Sander [1 ,2 ]
Ameye, Lieveke [3 ]
Lees, Christoph C. [1 ,4 ]
Pexsters, Anne [1 ]
Bourne, Tom [1 ,5 ]
Timmerman, Dirk [1 ]
Devlieger, Roland [1 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Univ Hosp Leuven, Dept Dev & Regenerat Pregnancy, Fetus & Neonate Gynaecol & Obstet, Herestr 49, -3000 Leuven, Belgium
[2] Erasmus MC, Univ Med Ctr, Div Obstet & Prenatal Med, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Wytemaweg 80, NL-3015 CN Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Dev & Regenerat, Herestr 49, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
[4] Imperial Coll London, Imperial Coll Healthcare NHS Trust, Queen Charlottes & Chelsea Hosp, Ctr Fetal Care, London, England
[5] Imperial Coll London, Imperial Coll Healthcare NHS Trust, Queen Charlottes & Chelsea Hosp, Dept Gynaecol & Obstet, London, England
关键词
Fetal anthropometric gender differences; Prenatal growth; Birth outcomes; Perinatal and neonatal management; CROWN-RUMP LENGTH; ULTRASOUND BIOMETRY; CHARTS; HEAD; SIZE; PREGNANCY; STANDARDS; ABDOMEN; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1186/s13293-019-0261-7
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background According to the WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group recommendations, boys and girls have different growth trajectories after birth. Our aim was to develop gender-specific fetal growth curves in a low-risk population and to compare immediate birth outcomes. Methods First, second, and third trimester fetal ultrasound examinations were conducted between 2002 and 2012. The data was selected using the following criteria: routine examinations in uncomplicated singleton pregnancies, Caucasian ethnicity, and confirmation of gestational age by a crown-rump length (CRL) measurement in the first trimester. Generalized Additive Model for Location, Scale and Shape (GAMLSS) was used to align the time frames of the longitudinal fetal measurements, corresponding with the methods of the postnatal growth curves of the WHO MGRS Group. Results A total of 27,680 complete scans were selected from the astraia (c) ultrasound database representing 12,368 pregnancies. Gender-specific fetal growth curves for biparietal diameter (BPD), head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC), and femur length (FL) were derived. The HC and BPD were significantly larger in boys compared to girls from 20 weeks of gestation onwards (p < 0.001) equating to a 3-day difference at 20-24 weeks. Boys were significantly heavier, longer, and had greater head circumference than girls (p < 0.001) at birth. The Apgar score at 1 min (p = 0.01) and arterial cord pH (p < 0.001) were lower in boys. Conclusions These longitudinal fetal growth curves for the first time allow integration with neonatal and pediatric WHO gender-specific growth curves. Boys exceed head growth halfway of the pregnancy, and immediate birth outcomes are worse in boys than girls. Gender difference in intrauterine growth is sufficiently distinct to have a clinically important effect on fetal weight estimation but also on the second trimester dating. Therefore, these differences might already play a role in early fetal or immediate neonatal management.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF STUDIES TO DERIVE CHARTS OF FETAL SIZE [J].
ALTMAN, DG ;
CHITTY, LS .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 1993, 3 (06) :378-384
[2]   Male predominance in fetal distress during labor [J].
Bekedam, DJ ;
Engelsbel, S ;
Mol, BWJ ;
Buitendijk, SE ;
van der Pal-de Bruin, KM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 187 (06) :1605-1607
[3]   Construction of the World Health Organization child growth standards: selection of methods for attained growth curves [J].
Borghi, E ;
de Onis, M ;
Garza, C ;
Van den Broeek, J ;
Frongillo, EA ;
Grummer-Strawn, L ;
Van Buuren, S ;
Pan, H ;
Molinari, L ;
Martorell, R ;
Onyango, AW ;
Martines, JC .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2006, 25 (02) :247-265
[4]   Human sexual size dimorphism in early pregnancy [J].
Bukowski, Radek ;
Smith, Gordon C. S. ;
Malone, Fergal D. ;
Ball, Robert H. ;
Nyberg, David A. ;
Comstock, Christine H. ;
Hankins, Gary D. V. ;
Berkowitz, Richard L. ;
Gross, Susan J. ;
Dugoff, Lorraine ;
Craigo, Sabrina D. ;
Timor-Tritsch, Ilan E. ;
Carr, Stephen R. ;
Wolfe, Honor M. ;
D'Alton, Mary E. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2007, 165 (10) :1216-1218
[5]  
CAMPBELL S, 1968, Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of the British Commonwealth, V75, P568
[6]  
CAMPBELL S, 1969, Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of the British Commonwealth, V76, P603
[7]   CHARTS OF FETAL SIZE .3. ABDOMINAL MEASUREMENTS [J].
CHITTY, LS ;
ALTMAN, DG ;
HENDERSON, A ;
CAMPBELL, S .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1994, 101 (02) :125-131
[8]   CHARTS OF FETAL SIZE .4. FEMUR LENGTH [J].
CHITTY, LS ;
ALTMAN, DG ;
HENDERSON, A ;
CAMPBELL, S .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1994, 101 (02) :132-135
[9]   CHARTS OF FETAL SIZE .2. HEAD MEASUREMENTS [J].
CHITTY, LS ;
ALTMAN, DG ;
HENDERSON, T ;
CAMPBELL, S .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1994, 101 (01) :35-43
[10]  
DONALD I, 1958, LANCET, V1, P1188