Multicenter Evaluation of Ceftazidime-Avibactam Susceptibility Testing of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa on the Vitek 2 System

被引:15
|
作者
Humphries, Romney [1 ,6 ]
Campeau, Shelley [1 ,7 ]
Davis, Thomas E. [2 ]
Nagaro, Kristin J. [2 ]
LaBombardi, Vincent J. [3 ]
Franklin, Simone [4 ]
Heimbach, Lisa [5 ]
Dwivedi, Hari P. [4 ]
机构
[1] UCLA Hlth Syst, Los Angeles, CA USA
[2] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Indianapolis, IN USA
[3] NewYork Presbyterian Queens, Flushing, NY USA
[4] BioMerieux Inc, Hazelwood, MO USA
[5] BioMerieux Inc, Durham, NC USA
[6] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Nashville, TN USA
[7] Accelerate Diagnost Inc, Tucson, AZ USA
关键词
automated susceptibility testing; Vitek; 2; Enterobacterales; Pseudomonas; ceftazidime-avibactam; CZA; LACTAMASE INHIBITOR COMBINATION;
D O I
10.1128/JCM.01870-20
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
In this multisite study, Vitek 2 AST-Gram-Negative Ceftazidime/Avibactam test results for 1,073 isolates (866 Enterobacterales and 207 Pseudomonas aeruginosa) were compared to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) broth microdilution (BMD) reference method. The results were analyzed for essential agreement (EA), category agreement (CA), major error rates, and very major error rates following FDA/ISO performance criteria using the FDA-recognized CLSI/EUCAST breakpoints (sensitive [S], <= 8/4mg/ ml; resistant [R], >= 16/4 mu g/ml). The overall EA was 94.5% (1,014/1,073) and CA was 98.7% (1,059/1,073). No very major errors were reported. The major error rate was 1.4% (14/998). Out of 14 major errors, 9 were within EA. Based on the EA and lack of an intermediate category for ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA), the adjusted major error rate for FDA criteria was 0.5% (5/998). The performance for ISO criteria after error resolutions included EA of 94.5% (1,014/1,073), CA of 98.9% (1,061/1,073), major error of 1.2% (12/998), and no very major error. Vitek 2 met the ISO and FDA criteria of >= 95% reproducibility and >= 95% quality control (QC) results within acceptable ranges for QC organisms. Vitek 2 overall performance for Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa met or exceeded the FDA and ISO performance criteria; thus, it is a reliable alternative to the BMD reference method for routine CZA susceptibility testing.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] In vitro susceptibility of carbapenem resistant Enterobacterales to meropenem-vaborbactam and ceftazidime-avibactam at a single academic medical centre
    Adams, Jenna
    Santarossa, Maressa
    Harrington, Amanda
    Bauer, Michael
    Wozniak, Amy
    Labuszewski, Laurie
    Albarillo, Fritzie S. S.
    INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2023, 55 (04) : 282 - 291
  • [32] Ceftolozane-Tazobactam Versus Ceftazidime-Avibactam for the Treatment of Infections Caused by Multidrug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: a Multicenter Cohort Study
    Almangour, Thamer A.
    Ghonem, Leen
    Alassiri, Dareen
    Aljurbua, Alanoud
    Al Musawa, Mohammed
    Alharbi, Aminah
    Almohaizeie, Abdullah
    Almuhisen, Sara
    Alghaith, Jeelan
    Damfu, Nader
    Aljefri, Doaa
    Alfahad, Wafa
    Khormi, Yaqoub
    Alanazi, Menyfah Q.
    Alsowaida, Yazed Saleh
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2023, 67 (08)
  • [33] In vitro activity of ceftolozane-tazobactam and ceftazidime-avibactam against Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from patients with cystic fibrosis
    Nolan, Patrick J.
    Jain, Raksha
    Cohen, Leah
    Finklea, James D.
    Smith, Tiffeny T.
    DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2021, 99 (02)
  • [34] IN VITRO ACTIVITY OF CEFTAZIDIME-AVIBACTAM AND COLISTIN AGAINST CARBAPENEM-RESISTANT PSEUDOMONAS AERUGINOSA CLINICAL ISOLATES
    Hosbul, Tugrul
    Aydogan, Canset Nur
    Kaya, Sinem
    Bedir, Rhan
    Ozcan, Hande
    Gumral, Ramazan
    JOURNAL OF ISTANBUL FACULTY OF MEDICINE-ISTANBUL TIP FAKULTESI DERGISI, 2022, 85 (03): : 355 - 361
  • [35] In vitro activity of ceftazidime-avibactam against clinical isolates of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa from sub-Saharan Africa: ATLAS Global Surveillance Program 2017-2021
    Wise, Mark G.
    Karlowsky, James A.
    Hackel, Meredith A.
    Harti, Mohamed Amine
    Ntshole, Bontle M. E.
    Njagua, Eva Njeri
    Oladele, Rita
    Samuel, Catherine
    Khan, Shameema
    Wadula, Jeannette
    Lowman, Warren
    Lembede, Busisani W.
    Sahm, Daniel F.
    JOURNAL OF GLOBAL ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE, 2023, 35 : 93 - 100
  • [36] Longitudinal analysis of the in vitro activity of ceftazidime-avibactam vs. Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 2012-2016
    Stone, Gregory G.
    Smayevsky, Jorgelina
    Kazmierczak, Krystyna
    DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2020, 96 (01)
  • [37] Comparison of methods to analyse susceptibility of German MDR/XDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa to ceftazidime/avibactam
    Schaumburg, Frieder
    Bletz, Stefan
    Mellmann, Alexander
    Becker, Karsten
    Idelevich, Evgeny A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2019, 54 (02) : 255 - 260
  • [38] Multicenter Evaluation of Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Ceftolozane-Tazobactam Inhibitory Activity against Meropenem-Nonsusceptible Pseudomonas aeruginosa from Blood, Respiratory Tract, and Wounds
    Grupper, Mordechai
    Sutherland, Christina
    Nicolau, David P.
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2017, 61 (10)
  • [39] Comparison of In Vitro Activity of Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Imipenem-Relebactam against Clinical Isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa
    Wang, Leilei
    Zhang, Xuefei
    Zhou, Xun
    Yang, Fan
    Guo, Qinglan
    Wang, Minggui
    MICROBIOLOGY SPECTRUM, 2023, 11 (03):
  • [40] Ceftazidime-avibactam for the Treatment of Multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Central Nervous System Infection in Pediatric Patient: A Case Report
    Almangour, Thamer A.
    Alsubaie, Sarah
    Ghonem, Leen
    Almohaini, Hissah A.
    Bakheet, Hind Mohammed
    Altweijri, Ikhlass
    PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASE JOURNAL, 2022, 41 (05) : 436 - 438