Digital innovation evaluation: user perceptions of innovation readiness, digital confidence, innovation adoption, user experience and behaviour change

被引:32
作者
Benson, Tim [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] R Outcomes Ltd, Newbury RG18 9WL, Berks, England
[2] UCL, Inst Hlth Informat, London, England
关键词
innovation diffusion; computer literacy; consumer behaviour; program evaluation; behaviour change;
D O I
10.1136/bmjhci-2019-000018
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Innovation spread is a key policy objective for health systems world-wide, but adoption success varies enormously. We have developed a set of short generic user-reported measures to help understand how and why healthcare innovations spread. This work builds on the literature and on practical experience in developing and using patient-reported outcome measures. Measures The Innovation Readiness Score measures user perceptions of how much they are open to and up-to-date with new ideas, and whether their organisations are receptive to and capable of innovation. It is based on Rogers' classification of innovativeness (innovator, early adopter, early majority, etc). The Digital Confidence Score rates users' digital literacy and confidence to use digital products, with dimensions of familiarity, social pressure, support and digital self-efficacy. The Innovation Adoption Score rates the adoption process in terms of coherence and reflective thought before, during and after implementation. It is based on Normalisation Process Theory. The User Satisfaction measure assesses a digital product in terms of usefulness, ease of use, support and satisfaction. The Behaviour Change measure covers user perceptions of their capability, opportunity and motivation to change behaviour, based on the COM-B model. These measures have been mapped onto Greenhalgh's NASSS Framework (non-adoption, abandonment and challenges to scale-up, spread and sustainability of health and care technologies). Conclusion These tools measure different aspects of digital health innovations and may help predict the success of innovation dissemination, diffusion and spread programmes.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
AHSN Network, ATR FIBR DET PROT PE
[2]   A short generic patient experience questionnaire: howRwe development and validation [J].
Benson, Tim ;
Potts, Henry W. W. .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2014, 14
[3]  
Benson Tim, 2010, Inform Prim Care, V18, P89
[4]   When complexity science meets implementation science: a theoretical and empirical analysis of systems change [J].
Braithwaite, Jeffrey ;
Churruca, Kate ;
Long, Janet C. ;
Ellis, Louise A. ;
Herkes, Jessica .
BMC MEDICINE, 2018, 16
[5]  
Collins B., 2018, ADOPTION SPREAD INNO
[6]   COMPUTER SELF-EFFICACY - DEVELOPMENT OF A MEASURE AND INITIAL TEST [J].
COMPEAU, DR ;
HIGGINS, CA .
MIS QUARTERLY, 1995, 19 (02) :189-211
[7]   Improving the normalization of complex interventions: measure development based on normalization process theory (NoMAD): study protocol [J].
Finch, Tracy L. ;
Rapley, Tim ;
Girling, Melissa ;
Mair, Frances S. ;
Murray, Elizabeth ;
Treweek, Shaun ;
McColl, Elaine ;
Steen, Ian Nicholas ;
May, Carl R. .
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2013, 8
[8]   How to improve success of technology projects in health and social care [J].
Greenhalgh, Trisha .
PUBLIC HEALTH RESEARCH & PRACTICE, 2018, 28 (03)
[9]   Studying complexity in health services research: desperately seeking an overdue paradigm shift [J].
Greenhalgh, Trisha ;
Papoutsi, Chrysanthi .
BMC MEDICINE, 2018, 16
[10]   Analysing the role of complexity in explaining the fortunes of technology programmes: empirical application of the NASSS framework [J].
Greenhalgh, Trisha ;
Wherton, Joe ;
Papoutsi, Chrysanthi ;
Lynch, Jenni ;
Hughes, Gemma ;
A'Court, Christine ;
Hinder, Sue ;
Procter, Rob ;
Shaw, Sara .
BMC MEDICINE, 2018, 16