Biomechanical testing of the locking compression plate: When does the distance between bone and implant significantly reduce construct stability?

被引:224
作者
Ahmad, M. [1 ]
Nanda, R.
Bajwa, A. S.
Candal-Couto, J.
Green, S.
Hui, A. C.
机构
[1] James Cook Univ Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Middlesbrough TS4 3BW, Cleveland, England
[2] Univ Durham, Dept Bioengn, Durham, England
来源
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED | 2007年 / 38卷 / 03期
关键词
locking compression plates; biomechanical testing; construct stability;
D O I
10.1016/j.injury.2006.08.058
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Aim: To investigate in vitro the mechanical stability of a locking compression plate (LCP) construct in a simulated diaphyseal fracture of the humerus at increasing distances between the plate and bone. Materials and method: A series of biomechanical in vitro experiments were performed using composite humerus sawbone as the bone model. Osteotomy created in the mid-diaphyseal region. A 10 mm osteotomy gap was bridged with a seven-hole 4.5 stainless steel plate with one of four methods: a control group consisted of a dynamic compression plate applied flush to the bone and three study groups which comprised of a LCP applied flush to the bone, at 2 mm and at 5 mm from the bone. Standard AO technique used with locking head screws used for LCP fixation. Static and dynamic loading tests performed in a custom made jig in which the bone model was fixed both proximally and distally. Samples were subjected to cyclical compression, compression load to failure, cyclical torque and torque to failure. Plastic deformation and failure was assessed using three-dimensional measurements. Scanning electron microscopy of the plate and screw surface allowed detailed inspection of micro-fracture in areas of fatigue. Results: Comparable results were achieved in both the DCP and LCP constructs in which the plate was applied at or less than 2 mm from the bone. When applied 5 mm from the bone the LCP demonstrated significantly increased plastic deformation during cyclical compression and required lower loads to induce construct failure. Conclusion: At a distance 5 mm we observe an inferior performance in the mechanical properties of the LCP construct with decrease in axial stiffness and torsional rigidity. If it is desirable for an LCP to be used the distance between plate and bone should be <= 2 mm. (C) 2007 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:358 / 364
页数:7
相关论文
共 7 条
[1]  
ARO HT, 1990, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P260
[2]  
COMPTE P, 1985, CURRENT INTERDISCIPL, P459
[3]  
Frigg R, 2001, INJURY, V32, pSB63
[4]   A comparative biomechanical evaluation of a noncontacting plate and currently used devices for tibial fixation [J].
Kowalski, MJ ;
Schemitsch, EH ;
Harrington, RM ;
Chapman, JR ;
Swiontkowski, MF .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1996, 40 (01) :5-9
[5]   A MECHANICAL COMPARISON OF THE DYNAMIC COMPRESSION PLATE, LIMITED CONTACT DYNAMIC COMPRESSION PLATE, AND POINT-CONTACT FIXATOR [J].
MICLAU, T ;
REMIGER, A ;
TEPIC, S ;
LINDSEY, R ;
MCIFF, T .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 1995, 9 (01) :17-22
[6]  
RIEMER BL, 1992, ORTHOPEDICS, V15, P907
[7]   Biomechanical testing of the LCP -: how can stability in locked internal fixators be controlled? [J].
Stoffel, K ;
Dieter, U ;
Stachowiak, G ;
Gächter, A ;
Kuster, MS .
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2003, 34 :11-19